Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Keohane, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Keohane, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Assessing 42 inflammatory markers in 321 control subjects and 887 major depressive disorder cases: BMI and other confounders and overall predictive ability for current depression

Inflammatory markers such as cytokines represent potential biomarkers for major depressive disorder (MDD). Many, generally small studies have examined the role of single markers and found significant associations. We assessed 42 inflammatory markers, namely cytokines, in the blood of 321 control subjects and 887 MDD cases. We tested whether individual inflammatory marker levels were significantly affected by MDD case/control status, current episode, or current depression severity, co-varying for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking, current antidepressant use, ethnicity, assay batch and study effects. We further used machine learning algorithms to investigate if we could use our data to blindly discriminate MDD patients, or those in a current episode. We found broad and powerful influences of confounding factors on log-protein levels. Notably, IL-6 levels were very strongly influenced by BMI (p = 1.37 x 10-43, variance explained = 18%), while Interleukin-16 was the most significant predictor of current depressive episode (p = 0.003, variance explained = 0.9%, q < 0.1). No single inflammatory marker predicted MDD case/control status when a subject was not in a depressed episode, nor did any predict depression severity. Machine learning results revealed that using inflammatory marker data with clinical confounder information significantly increased precision for differentiating MDD patients who were in an episode. To conclude, a wide panel of inflammatory markers alongside clinical information may aid in predicting the onset of symptoms, but no single inflammatory protein is likely to represent a clinically useful biomarker for MDD diagnosis or prognosis. We note that the potential influence of physical health related and population stratification related confounders on inflammatory biomarker studies in psychiatry is considerable.

neuroscience

Does genetic risk help to predict amyloid burden in a non-demented population? A Bayesian approach.

INTRODUCTIONIn this study we investigate the association between A{beta} levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and genetic risk in a non-demented population. This paper presents the first analysis to use a Bayesian methodology in this area.\n\nMETHODSData from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and the EDAR* and DESCRIPA** studies was used in a Bayesian logistic regression analysis. We modeled CSF A{beta} burden using age, diagnosis (healthy control or mild cognitive impairment), APOE and a polygenic risk score (PGRS) associated with Alzheimers Disease (AD). We compared models built using informative priors on age, diagnosis and APOE with non-informative priors on all variables.\n\nRESULTSThe use of informative priors did not improve model performance in the majority of cases. Models using only age, diagnosis and APOE genotype showed the best predictive ability.\n\nDISCUSSIONA previous study indicated that a PGRS of AD case/control status was associated with CSF A{beta} burden in healthy controls. The current study suggests that this association does not lead to models that are more predictive of amyloid positivity than already known factors such as age and APOE.\n\n* Beta amyloid oligomers in the early diagnosis of AD and as marker for treatment response\n\n** Development of screening guidelines and criteria for pre-dementia Alzheimers disease

bioinformatics