Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Keller, P. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Keller, P. M..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Persistent Staphylococcus aureus in human musculoskeletal tissues despite targeted antibiotic therapy

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of musculoskeletal infection with frequent recurrence despite surgery and antibiotic therapy. Its persistence in human tissues under antibiotic pressure remains unclear. We performed longitudinal in situ analyses of matched tissue samples before and during therapy from patients undergoing repeated surgery using advanced imaging and tissue-based metagenomics. S. aureus remained detectable in all samples--including culture-negative specimens--and whole-genome sequencing confirmed persistence of the infecting strain. Antibiotic initiation reduced bacterial burden by 1.0Slog10 bacteria/mm3 but residual loads stabilized thereafter. Quantitative imaging identified a culture detection threshold ([~]103bacteria/mm3), indicating that culture negativity reflects diagnostic sensitivity limits rather than true bacterial clearance. Persistence under antibiotic therapy was associated with high baseline burden and intracellular sequestration, whereas long-term persistence was characterized by predominantly extracellular bacteria capable of driving relapse. These findings reveal sustained tissue persistence despite apparent microbiological clearance and guide precision strategies to target resilient bacterial reservoirs.

microbiology↗

Microgeography of staphyloccoci in human tissue explains antibiotic failure

Summary paragraphBacterial infections remain a major health threat, yet pathogen biology in human tissues is poorly understood. Using AI-guided imaging, we mapped [~]15,500 Staphylococcus aureus cells in biopsies from 33 patients undergoing surgery for musculoskeletal infections. Despite substantial interindividual variability, consistent patterns emerged. Most bacteria resided within non-classical monocytes/macrophages, challenging models of primarily extracellular pathogenesis. Both intra- and extracellular bacteria were predominantly isolated single cells or doublets with low rRNA content, suggesting limited replication. Complementary proteomics implicated inflammation-associated hypoxia and host glucose-to-lactate metabolism as growth constraints. Preoperative antibiotic therapy failed to clear bacteria across microenvironments and cluster sizes, challenging assumptions that antibiotic tolerance is confined to intracellular niches or biofilms and underscoring the clinical need for debridement. In vitro models replicating diverse tissues conditions impaired antibiotic activity, indicating multifactorial resilience. Together, these findings redefine S. aureus infection biology in musculoskeletal infections and establish a framework for mechanism-based prevention and therapy.

microbiology↗

Exposure of gut bacterial isolates to the anthelminthic drugs, ivermectin and moxidectin, leads to antibiotic-like phenotypes of growth inhibition and adaptation.

Due to their broad-spectrum activities, ivermectin and moxidectin are widely used anthelminthics in veterinary and human medicine. However, ivermectin has recently been shown to perturbate gut-microbial growth. Given the macrolide-like structure of both ivermectin and moxidectin, there is a need to characterize the antibiotic spectrum of these anthelminthic drugs and their potential implications in the development of cross-resistance to macrolides and other families of antibiotics. Here, we incubated 59 bacterial isolates representing different clades frequently found in the gut with ivermectin and moxidectin at different concentrations for 16-72h. Further, we challenged 10 bacterial isolates with repeated and gradually increasing concentrations of these two anthelminthics and subsequently characterized their sensitivity to different antibiotics as well as ascending anthelminthic concentrations. We found, that antibacterial activity of the two anthelminthics is comparable to a selection of tested antibiotics, as observed by potency and dose dependence. Bacterial anthelminthic challenging in vitro resulted in decreased anthelminthic sensitivity. Further, adaptation to anthelminthics is associated with decreased antibiotic sensitivity towards three macrolides, a lincosamide, a fluoroquinolone, a tetracycline and two carbapenems. The observed change in bacterial sensitivity profiles is associated with - and likely caused by - repeated anthelminthic exposure. Hence, current and future large-scale administration of ivermectin and moxidectin, respectively, for the control of helminths and malaria raises serious concerns - and hence potential off-target effects should be carefully monitored.

microbiology↗

Whole genome sequencing for drug resistance profile prediction in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Whole genome sequencing allows rapid detection of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates. However, high-quality data linking quantitative phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) and genomic data have thus far been lacking.\n\nWe determined drug resistance profiles of 176 genetically diverse clinical M. tuberculosis isolates from Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ivory Coast, Peru, Thailand and Switzerland by quantitative phenotypic DST for 11 antituberculous drugs using the BD BACTEC MGIT 960 system and 7H10 agar dilution to generate a cross-validated phenotypic DST readout. We compared phenotypic drug susceptibility results with predicted drug resistance profiles inferred by whole genome sequencing.\n\nBoth phenotypic DST methods identically classified the strains into resistant/susceptible in 73-99% of the cases, depending on the drug. Changes in minimal inhibitory concentrations were readily explained by mutations identified by whole genome sequencing. Using the whole genome sequences we were able to predict quantitative drug resistance levels where wild type and mutant MIC distributions did not overlap. The utility of genome sequences to predict quantitative levels of drug resistance was partially limited due to incompletely understood mechanisms influencing the expression of phenotypic drug resistance. The overall sensitivity and specificity of whole genome-based DST were 86.8% and 94.5%, respectively.\n\nDespite some limitations, whole genome sequencing has high predictive power to infer resistance profiles without the need for time-consuming phenotypic methods.\n\nOne sentence summaryWhole genome sequencing of clinical M. tuberculosis isolates accurately predicts drug resistance profiles and may replace culture-based drug susceptibility testing in the future.

microbiology↗

Drug susceptibility testing and mortality in patients treated for tuberculosis in high-burden countries

BackgroundDrug resistance and HIV co-infection are challenges for the global control of tuberculosis.\n\nMethodsWe collected Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from adult patients in Cote dIvoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Peru, and Thailand, stratified by HIV status and tuberculosis drug resistance. Molecular or phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) was done locally and at the Swiss tuberculosis reference laboratory. We examined mortality during treatment according to DST results and treatment adequacy in logistic regression models adjusting for sex, age, sputum microscopy and HIV status.\n\nFindings634 tuberculosis patients were included; median age was 33.2 years, 239 (37.7%) were female, 272 (42.9%) HIV-positive and 69 (10.9%) patients died. Based on the reference laboratory DST, 394 (62.2%) strains were pan-susceptible, 45 (7.1%) mono-resistant, 163 (25.7%) multidrug-resistant (MDR-TB), and 30 (4.7%) had pre-extensive or extensive drug resistance (pre-XDR/XDR-TB). Results of reference and local laboratories were discordant in 121 (19.1%) cases, corresponding to a sensitivity of 84.3% and a specificity of 90.8%. In patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis, discordant results were associated with increased mortality (risk ratio 1.81; 95% CI 1.07-3.07). In logistic regression, compared to adequately treated patients with pan-susceptible strains, the adjusted odds ratio for death was 4.23 (95% CI 2.16-8.29) for adequately treated patients with drug-resistant strains and 21.54 (95% CI 3.36-138.1) for inadequately treated patients with drug-resistant strains. HIV status was not associated with mortality.\n\nInterpretationUsing a reference laboratory standard, inaccurate DST leading to inappropriate treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis, but not HIV infection, contributed to mortality.

epidemiology↗