Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Keck, J. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Keck, J. L..

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Visualization of the complete primosome reveals the structural mechanisms governing DNA replication restart

Replication restart pathways reinitiate DNA replication processes following their premature termination. In Escherichia coli, this essential process begins with the regulated assembly of the primosome complex, comprising the PriA, PriB, and DnaT proteins, onto an abandoned replication fork. Here, we present two distinct primosome structures. One represents an intermediate stage in primosome assembly with a single DnaT C-terminal domain (DnaTCTD) bound to PriA/PriB/DNA. The second captures the mature primosome, in which filamentation of multiple DnaTCTD molecules catalyzes the handoff of the single-stranded DNA lagging strand from PriB to DnaT. The DnaT N-terminal domain forms a separate, independent oligomer in the mature structure. Taken together, our results detail the molecular mechanisms underlying replication restart initiation and regulation and suggest an unexpected mechanistic similarity between DnaT and the canonical initiator protein DnaA.

biochemistry↗

Alternative splicing modulates chromatin interactome and phase separation of the RIF1 C-terminal domain

How RIF1 (RAP1 interacting factor) fulfills its diverse roles in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, DNA replication, and nuclear organization remains elusive. Here we show that alternative splicing (AS) of a cassette exon (Ex32) encoding a Ser/Lys-rich (S/K) cassette in the RIF1 C-terminal domain (CTD) gives rise to RIF1-Long (RIF1-L) and RIF1-Short (RIF1-S) isoforms with different functional characteristics. We demonstrate that RIF1-Ex32 splice-in is mediated by an exonic splicing enhancer that is recognized by the splicing factor SRSF1 and antagonized by splicing inhibitors SRSF3 and SRSF7. Exposure to DNA damage inhibited Ex32 splice-in, potentiated the association of SRSF3 and SRSF7 with RIF1 pre-mRNA, and caused an increase in RIF1-S protein expression, which was also observed across a diverse set of primary cancers. Isoform-specific proteomic analyses revealed RIF1-L preferentially associated with mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1 (MDC1) and sustained MDC1 focus formation to a greater extent than RIF1-S. We further show that the S/K cassette stabilized a novel phase separation activity of the RIF1 CTD and enhanced RIF1-L chromatin retention, which was reversed by CDK1-dependent phosphorylation of the RIF1 CTD in response to G2 DNA damage checkpoint inhibition. These combined findings suggest DNA damage-dependent RIF1 AS contributes to RIF1 functional diversification in genome protection.

molecular biology↗

Altering translation allows E. coli to overcome chemically stabilized G-quadruplexes

G-quadruplex (G4) structures can form in guanine-rich DNA or RNA and have been found to modulate cellular processes including replication, transcription, and translation. Many studies on the cellular roles of G4s have focused on eukaryotic systems, with far fewer probing bacterial G4s. Using a chemical-genetic approach, we identified genes in Escherichia coli that are important for growth in G4-stabilizing conditions. Reducing levels of elongation factor Tu or slowing translation elongation with chloramphenicol suppress the effects of G4 stabilization. In contrast, reducing expression of certain translation termination or ribosome recycling proteins is detrimental to growth in G4-stabilizing conditions. Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses demonstrate that ribosome assembly factors and other proteins involved in translation are less abundant in G4-stabilizing conditions. Our integrated systems approach allowed us to propose a model for how RNA G4s can present barriers to E. coli growth and that reducing the rate of translation can compensate for G4-related stress.

biochemistry↗

Biochemical Properties of Naturally Occurring Human Bloom Helicase Variants

Bloom syndrome helicase (BLM) is a RecQ-family helicase implicated in a variety of cellular processes, including DNA replication, DNA repair, and telomere maintenance. Mutations in human BLM cause Bloom syndrome (BS), an autosomal recessive disorder that leads to myriad negative health impacts including a predisposition to cancer. BS-causing mutations in BLM often negatively impact BLM ATPase and helicase activity. While BLM mutations that cause BS have been well characterized both in vitro and in vivo, there are other less studied BLM mutations that exist in the human population that do not lead to BS. Two of these non-BS mutations, encoding BLM P868L and BLM G1120R, when homozygous, increase sister chromatid exchanges in human cells. To characterize these naturally occurring BLM mutant proteins in vitro, we purified the BLM catalytic core (BLMcore, residues 636-1298) with either the P868L or G1120R substitution. We also purified a BLMcore K869A K870A mutant protein, which alters a lysine-rich loop proximal to the P868 residue. We found that BLMcore P868L and G1120R proteins were both able to hydrolyze ATP, bind diverse DNA substrates, and unwind G-quadruplex and duplex DNA structures. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that the P868L substitution weakens the DNA interaction with the winged-helix domain of BLM and alters the orientation of one lobe of the ATPase domain. Because BLMcore P868L and G1120R retain helicase function in vitro, it is likely that the increased genome instability is caused by specific impacts of the mutant proteins in vivo. Interestingly, we found that BLMcore K869A K870A has diminished ATPase activity, weakened binding to duplex DNA structures, and less robust helicase activity compared to wild-type BLMcore. Thus, the lysine-rich loop may have an important role in ATPase activity and specific binding and DNA unwinding functions in BLM.

biochemistry↗

Interaction with single-stranded DNA-binding protein modulates Escherichia coli RadD DNA repair activities

The bacterial RadD enzyme is important for multiple genome maintenance pathways, including RecA DNA strand exchange and RecA-independent suppression of DNA crossover template switching. However, much remains unknown about the precise roles of RadD. One potential clue into RadD mechanisms is its direct interaction with the single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB), which coats single-stranded DNA exposed during genome maintenance reactions in cells. Interaction with SSB stimulates the ATPase activity of RadD. To probe the mechanism and importance of RadD/SSB complex formation, we identified a pocket on RadD that is essential for binding SSB. In a mechanism shared with many other SSB-interacting proteins, RadD uses a hydrophobic pocket framed by basic residues to bind the C-terminal end of SSB. RadD variants that substitute acidic residues for basic residues in the SSB binding site impair RadD/SSB complex formation and eliminate SSB stimulation of RadD ATPase activity in vitro. Mutant E. coli strains carrying charge reversal radD changes display increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents synergistically with deletions of radA and recG, although the phenotypes of the SSB-binding radD mutants are not as severe a full radD deletion. This suggests that RadD has multiple functions in the cell, with a subset requiring the interaction with SSB.

biochemistry↗

Identification of genetic interactions with priB links the PriA/PriB DNA replication restart pathway to double-strand DNA break repair in Escherichia coli

Collisions between DNA replication complexes (replisomes) and impediments such as damaged DNA or proteins tightly bound to the chromosome lead to premature dissociation of replisomes at least once per cell cycle in Escherichia coli. Left unrepaired, these events produce incompletely replicated chromosomes that cannot be properly partitioned into daughter cells. DNA replication restart, the process that reloads replisomes at prematurely terminated sites, is therefore essential in E. coli and other bacteria. Three replication restart pathways have been identified in E. coli: PriA/PriB, PriA/PriC, and PriC/Rep. A limited number of genetic interactions between replication restart and other genome maintenance pathways have been defined, but a systematic study placing replication restart reactions in a broader cellular context has not been performed. We have utilized transposon insertion sequencing to identify new genetic interactions between DNA replication restart pathways and other cellular systems. Known genetic interactors with the priB replication restart gene (uniquely involved in the PriA/PriB pathway) were confirmed and several novel priB interactions were discovered. Far fewer connections were found with the PriA/PriC or PriC/Rep pathways, suggesting a primacy role for the PriA/PriB pathway in E. coli. Targeted genetic and imaging-based experiments with priB and its genetic partners revealed significant double-strand DNA break (DSB) accumulation in strains with mutations in dam, rep, rdgC, lexA, or polA. Modulating the activity of the RecA recombinase partially suppressed the detrimental effects of rdgC or lexA mutations in {Delta}priB cells. Taken together, our results highlight roles for several genes in DSB homeostasis and define a genetic network that facilitates DNA repair/processing upstream of PriA/PriB-mediated DNA replication restart in E. coli. Author SummaryAll organisms rely on DNA replication to grow, develop, and reproduce. In bacteria, the cellular machinery that carries out DNA replication is estimated to fail and prematurely dissociate from the genome at least once per cell cycle. As a result, bacteria have evolved "DNA replication restart" mechanisms that resuscitate failed replication reactions. To probe the function and context of DNA replication restart in the bacterium Escherichia coli, we employed a genetic screen to identify genes that were conditionally important in mutant E. coli strains compromised in their ability to perform DNA replication restart. Identification of genes with previously known relationships with DNA replication restart confirmed the robustness of our screen, while additional findings implicated novel genetic relationships. Targeted experiments validated the importance of these genes and provided an explanation for their significance in preventing double-strand DNA breaks in cells, a severe form of DNA damage. Our results help to define specific roles for the genes identified by our screen and elucidate the contextual environment of DNA repair upstream of DNA replication restart in E. coli.

genetics↗

Natural transformation protein ComFA exhibits single-stranded DNA translocase activity

Natural transformation is one of the major mechanisms of horizontal gene transfer in bacterial populations and has been demonstrated in numerous species of bacteria. Despite the prevalence of natural transformation, much of the molecular mechanism remains unexplored. One major outstanding question is how the cell powers DNA import, which is rapid and highly processive. ComFA is one of a handful of proteins required for natural transformation in gram-positive bacteria. Its structural resemblance to the DEADbox helicase family has led to a long-held hypothesis that ComFA acts as a motor to help drive DNA import into the cytosol. Here, we explored the helicase and translocase activity of ComFA to address this hypothesis. We followed the DNA-dependent ATPase activity of ComFA and, combined with mathematical modeling, demonstrated that ComFA likely translocates on single-stranded DNA from 5 to 3. However, this translocase activity does not lead to DNA unwinding in the conditions we tested. Further, we analyzed the ATPase cycle of ComFA and found that ATP hydrolysis stimulates the release of DNA, providing a potential mechanism for translocation. These findings help define the molecular contribution of ComFA to natural transformation and support the conclusion that ComFA plays a key role in powering DNA uptake. ImportanceCompetence, or the ability of bacteria to take up and incorporate foreign DNA in a process called natural transformation is common in the bacterial kingdom, but understanding of the mechanism is still limited. Increasing evidence in several bacteria confirms that long, contiguous stretches of DNA are imported into cells, and yet how bacteria power processive transformation remains unclear. Our finding that ComFA, a DExD-box helicase required for competence in gram-positive bacteria, translocates on single-stranded DNA from 5 to 3, supports the long held hypothesis that ComFA may be the motor powering DNA transport during natural transformation. Moreover, ComFA may be a previously unidentified type of DExD-box helicase--one with the capability of extended translocation on single-stranded DNA.

microbiology↗

The molecular coupling between substrate recognition and ATP turnover in a AAA+ hexameric helicase loader

In many bacteria and in eukaryotes, replication fork establishment requires the controlled loading of hexameric, ring-shaped helicases around DNA by AAA+ ATPases. How loading factors use ATP to control helicase deposition is poorly understood. Here, we dissect how specific ATPase elements of E. coli DnaC, an archetypal loader for the bacterial DnaB helicase, play distinct roles in helicase loading and the activation of DNA unwinding. We identify a new element, the arginine-coupler, which regulates the switch-like behavior of DnaC to prevent futile ATPase cycling and maintains loader responsiveness to replication restart systems. Our data help explain how the ATPase cycle of a AAA+-family helicase loader is channeled into productive action on its target; comparative studies indicate elements analogous to the Arg-coupler are present in related, switch-like AAA+ proteins that control replicative helicase loading in eukaryotes, as well as polymerase clamp loading and certain classes of DNA transposases.

biochemistry↗

Molecular mechanism of regulation of the purine salvage enzyme XPRT by the alarmones pppGpp, ppGpp, and pGpp

The alarmones pppGpp and ppGpp mediate starvation response and maintain purine homeostasis to protect bacterial species. Xanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (XPRT) is a purine salvage enzyme that produces the nucleotide XMP from PRPP and xanthine. Combining structural, biochemical and genetic analyses, we show that pppGpp and ppGpp, as well as a third putative alarmone pGpp, all directly interact with XPRT and inhibit XPRT activity by competing with its substrate PRPP. Structural analysis reveals that ppGpp binds the PRPP binding motif within the XPRT active site. This motif is present in another (p)ppGpp target, the purine salvage enzyme HPRT, suggesting evolutionary conservation in different enzymes. However, XPRT oligomeric interaction is distinct from HPRT in that XPRT forms a symmetric dimer with two (p)ppGpp binding sites at the dimer interface. This results in two distinct regulatory features. First, XPRT cooperatively binds (p)ppGpp with a Hill coefficient of 2. Also, XPRT displays differential regulation by the alarmones as it is potently inhibited by both ppGpp and pGpp, but only modestly by pppGpp. Lastly, we demonstrate that the alarmones are necessary for protecting GTP homeostasis against excess environmental xanthine in Bacillus subtilis, suggesting that regulation of XPRT is key for regulating the purine salvage pathway.

microbiology↗

Practical model selection for prospective virtual screening

Virtual (computational) high-throughput screening provides a strategy for prioritizing compounds for experimental screens, but the choice of virtual screening algorithm depends on the dataset and evaluation strategy. We consider a wide range of ligand-based machine learning and docking-based approaches for virtual screening on two protein-protein interactions, PriA-SSB and RMI-FANCM, and present a strategy for choosing which algorithm is best for prospective compound prioritization. Our workflow identifies a random forest as the best algorithm for these targets over more sophisticated neural network-based models. The top 250 predictions from our selected random forest recover 37 of the 54 active compounds from a library of 22,434 new molecules assayed on PriA-SSB. We show that virtual screening methods that perform well in public datasets and synthetic benchmarks, like multi-task neural networks, may not always translate to prospective screening performance on a specific assay of interest.

biochemistry↗