Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Keasar, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Keasar, T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Do flowers with specialized morphologies produce more nectar and pollen?

Premise of the studyFlower morphology influences the wiring of plant-pollinator interaction networks. Flowers with deep corolla tubes and bilateral symmetry have a narrower pollinator range, hence are considered more specialized than shallow radial flowers. Past inter-specific comparisons revealed positive correlations between flower depth and nectar production rates in a few plant communities, suggesting that specialized flowers may allocate more resources into food rewards for pollinators. MethodsTo evaluate this hypothesis, we compiled a global dataset of flower morphology vs. nectar sugar production rates (n = 494 plant species) and per-flower pollen counts (n = 164 species). We applied phylogenetically controlled mixed models to examine the effects of symmetry and tube length on floral rewards. Key resultsCorolla tube lengths, symmetry type and their interaction significantly predicted nectar production rates, with the larger effect attributed to tube length. Neither tube length nor symmetry predicted pollen number. Both nectar and pollen production were affected by phylogeny in a larger dataset that included 854 nectar-producing and 1040 pollen-producing species. Plant genus explained more of the variation in nectar production, and less of the variation in pollen production, than plant family. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that visual signals associated with specialized flowers honestly advertise nectar production, but not pollen rewards. Other visual and chemical family-specific floral displays potentially advertise pollen availability to pollinators. We propose experiments to test whether nectar foragers indeed use flower depth as a visual signal that guides their choices of nectar sources.

ecology↗

Spillover of managed bumble bees from Mediterranean orchards during mass flowering causes minor short-term ecological impacts

Commercial bumble bee colonies are routinely used for crop pollination in greenhouses, and are increasingly introduced into orchards as well. Bumble bee spillover to natural habitats neighboring the orchards may interfere with local wild bees and impact the pollination of non-crop plants. Concurrently, foraging in natural habitats may diversify the bumble bees diets and improve colony development. To evaluate these potential effects, we placed commercial Bombus terrestris colonies in blooming Rosaceae orchards, 25-125 m away from the margins. We recorded the colonies mass gain, population sizes, composition of stored pollen, and temperature regulation. We monitored bee activity, and seed sets of the non-crop plant Eruca sativa, along transects in a semi-natural shrubland up to 100 m away from the orchards, with managed bumble bees either present or absent. Rosaceae pollen comprised [~]1/3 of the colonies pollen stores at all distances from the orchard margins. Colonies placed closest to the margins showed prolonged development, produced fewer reproductive individuals, and had poorer thermoregulation than colonies closer to the orchards center. Possibly, abiotic stressors inhibited the bumble bees development near orchard borders. Wild bees were as active during the colonies deployment as after their removal. E. sativas seed sets decreased after bumble bee removal, but similar declines also occurred near a control orchard without managed bumble bees. Altogether, we found no short-term spillover effects of managed bumble bees on nearby plant-bee communities during the orchards two-week flowering. The colonies prompt removal after blooming can reduce longer-term ecological risks associated with managed bumble bees.

ecology↗