Biology subjects

Kean, H. H.

Publications and source records attributed to Kean, H. H..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Semantic reasoning takes place largely outside the language network

The brains language network is often implicated in the representation and manipulation of abstract semantic knowledge. However, this view is inconsistent with a large body of evidence suggesting that language processing is neurally distinct from the rest of cognition. Here, we use precision brain imaging to uncover a set of brain regions, separate from the language network, that are engaged in semantic processing of both linguistic and pictorial stimuli. In three fMRI experiments, participants (total n=41 tested across 49 sessions) viewed sentences and pictures depicting simple events. In separate blocks, they performed either a semantic task or a difficulty-matched perceptual task. Across all three experiments, several areas in left lateral prefrontal cortex, left temporo-parietal cortex, and right cerebellum responded to semantic tasks for both sentences and pictures. These semantic processing areas are spatially and functionally distinct from the nearby language-selective areas, as well as from the multiple demand and default mode networks, exhibiting a unique response profile. Our results provide evidence for a new kind of selectivity in the human brain and pave the way for future explorations of the neural mechanisms that underlie semantic reasoning.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

The language network responds robustly to sentences across diverse tasks

A network of left frontal and temporal brain areas supports language comprehension and production, implementing computations related to word retrieval and combinatorial linguistic processing. Here, we ask: to what extent are responses to language in this language network stable across task contexts, and how does this stability compare to task sensitivity in the domain-general multiple demand (MD) network? Participants (n=52) read sentences and nonword lists under six task conditions, including passive reading, reading with a memory probe after each stimulus, and reading and answering questions that require deep semantic engagement. The sentences>nonwords contrast isolated the same set of language-responsive voxels across all tasks; the locations of those voxels were participant-specific, highlighting the value of individual-specific functional localization. We therefore conclude that language localization is robust to task variation. We then examined the magnitudes and fine-grained activation patterns in these language-responsive voxels (the language network) and in the domain-general MD network, to test whether task demands modulate linguistic computations and/or recruit a distinct brain system. The language network responded robustly to sentences across all tasks, with somewhat higher responses to semantically engaging tasks. In contrast, the MD network responded to both sentences and nonwords in the presence of a task, which warrants caution when using language paradigms that include task demands, as such paradigms engage two independent networks. A multivariate analysis further revealed that stimulus information is more easily decodable in the language network, whereas task information is more decodable in the MD network. These results suggest that the language and MD networks perform complementary functions during task-driven language comprehension, with the language network primarily extracting information from linguistic input and the MD network determining the appropriate response to the task.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

A human brain network specialized for abstract formal reasoning

Humans stand out in the animal kingdom for their ability to reason in highly abstract ways. Using a deep-data precision fMRI approach, we identify and richly characterize a network of frontal brain areas that support abstract formal reasoning. This abstract reasoning network robustly dissociates from the domain-general Multiple Demand network--the current leading candidate substrate of fluid intelligence--as well as from three other networks supporting high-level cognition: the language network, the intuitive physical reasoning network, and the social reasoning network. Finally, the areas of this network respond robustly during both deductive and inductive reasoning, during classic matrix reasoning problems, and when solving multiplication and division problems. This network may therefore support the most abstract forms of reasoning, possibly constituting a human-specific adaptation.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Intuitive physical reasoning is not mediated by linguistic nor exclusively domain-general abstract representations

The ability to reason about the physical world is a critical tool in the human cognitive toolbox, but the nature of the representations that mediate physical reasoning remains debated. Here, we use fMRI to illuminate this question by investigating the relationship between the physical-reasoning system and two well-characterized systems: a) the domain-general Multiple Demand (MD) system, which supports abstract reasoning, including mathematical and logical reasoning, and b) the language system, which supports linguistic computations and has been hypothesized to mediate some forms of thought. We replicate prior findings of a network of frontal and parietal areas that are robustly engaged by physical reasoning and identify an additional physical-reasoning area in the left frontal cortex, which also houses components of the MD and language systems. Critically, direct comparisons with tasks that target the MD and the language systems reveal that the physical-reasoning system overlaps with the MD system, but is dissociable from it in fine-grained activation patterns, which replicates prior work. Moreover, the physical-reasoning system does not overlap with the language system. These results suggest that physical reasoning does not rely on linguistic representations, nor exclusively on the domain-general abstract reasoning that the MD system supports.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Comprehension of computer code relies primarily on domain-general executive resources

Computer programming is a novel cognitive tool that has transformed modern society. What cognitive and neural mechanisms support this skill? Here, we used fMRI to investigate two candidate brain systems: the multiple demand (MD) system, typically recruited during math, logic, problem solving, and executive tasks, and the language system, typically recruited during linguistic processing. We examined MD and language system responses to code written in Python, a text-based programming language (Experiment 1) and in ScratchJr, a graphical programming language (Experiment 2); for both, we contrasted responses to code problems with responses to content-matched sentence problems. We found that the MD system exhibited strong bilateral responses to code in both experiments, whereas the language system responded strongly to sentence problems, but weakly or not at all to code problems. Thus, the MD system supports the use of novel cognitive tools even when the input is structurally similar to natural language.

neuroscience↗