Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kashefi, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Kashefi, M..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Neural correlates of online action preparation

When performing movements in rapid succession, the brain needs to coordinate preparation of an upcoming action with ongoing execution. Here we identify the processes and brain areas involved in this ability. Human participants performed pairs of single-finger presses or three-finger chords in settings where they had to prepare the second movement before or after the first response. Despite matched perceptual and movement requirements, 7T functional MRI revealed increased brain activity in regions along the intra-parietal sulcus and ventral visual stream when actions overlapped. Multivariate analyses suggested that these areas were involved in stimulus identification and action selection. In contrast, the dorsal premotor cortex, known to be involved in planning upcoming movements, showed no discernible signs of heightened activity. This observation suggests that the bottleneck during simultaneous action control and preparation arises at the level of stimulus identification and action selection, whereas movement planning in the premotor cortex can unfold concurrently with execution without interference between the two processes. SummaryThe brains ability to prepare for upcoming actions while controlling ongoing movements is a crucial evolutionary adaptation of the action system. However, the neural basis of online action preparation remains largely unknown. We found that superior-parietal and occipito-temporal areas exhibited heightened activation during online preparation. Surprisingly, the dorsal premotor cortex, known to be a crucial structure in motor planning, did not display additional activation for overlapping actions. These findings imply that while motor planning within the premotor cortex can occur in parallel with the execution of ongoing movement, the parallel stimulus identification and action selection in the posterior parietal cortex requires additional neural processes. HighlightsO_LIIndividuals prepare upcoming actions while simultaneously controlling ongoing movement C_LIO_LIWhen these two processes overlap, superior-parietal and occipito-temporal areas show increased activation C_LIO_LIMultivariate analysis suggests that increased activation arises to resolve simultaneous stimulus identification and action selection C_LIO_LIThe premotor cortex, known to be involved in motor planning, coordinates simultaneous planning and execution without extra neural engagement C_LI

neuroscience↗

Interaction of multiple future movement plans in sequential reaching

Real world actions often comprise of a series of movements that cannot be entirely planned before initiation. When these actions are executed rapidly, the planning of multiple future movements needs to occur simultaneously with the ongoing action. How the brain solves this task remains unknown. Here we address this question with a new sequential arm reaching paradigm that manipulates how many future reaches are available for planning while controlling execution of the ongoing reach. We show that participants plan at least two future reaches simultaneously with an ongoing reach. Further, the planning processes of the two future reaches are not independent of one another. Evidence that the planning processes interact is two-fold. First, correcting for a visual perturbation of the ongoing reach target is slower when more future reaches are planned. Second, the curvature of the current reach is modified based on the next reach only when their planning processes temporally overlap. These interactions between future planning processes may enable smooth production of sequential actions by linking individual segments of a long sequence at the level of motor planning.

neuroscience↗

Myomatrix arrays for high-definition muscle recording

Neurons coordinate their activity to produce an astonishing variety of motor behaviors. Our present understanding of motor control has grown rapidly thanks to new methods for recording and analyzing populations of many individual neurons over time. In contrast, current methods for recording the nervous systems actual motor output - the activation of muscle fibers by motor neurons - typically cannot detect the individual electrical events produced by muscle fibers during natural behaviors and scale poorly across species and muscle groups. Here we present a novel class of electrode devices ("Myomatrix arrays") that record muscle activity at unprecedented resolution across muscles and behaviors. High-density, flexible electrode arrays allow for stable recordings from the muscle fibers activated by a single motor neuron, called a "motor unit", during natural behaviors in many species, including mice, rats, primates, songbirds, frogs, and insects. This technology therefore allows the nervous systems motor output to be monitored in unprecedented detail during complex behaviors across species and muscle morphologies. We anticipate that this technology will allow rapid advances in understanding the neural control of behavior and in identifying pathologies of the motor system.

neuroscience↗

MotorNet: a Python toolbox for controlling differentiable biomechanical effectors with artificial neural networks

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are a powerful class of computational models for unravelling neural mechanisms of brain function. However, for neural control of movement, they currently must be integrated with software simulating biomechanical effectors, leading to limiting impracticalities: (1) researchers must rely on two different platforms and (2) biomechanical effectors are not generally differentiable, constraining researchers to reinforcement learning algorithms despite the existence and potential biological relevance of faster training methods. To address these limitations, we developed MotorNet, an open-source Python toolbox for creating arbitrarily complex, differentiable, and biomechanically realistic effectors that can be trained on user-defined motor tasks using ANNs. MotorNet is designed to meet several goals: ease of installation, ease of use, a high-level user-friendly API, and a modular architecture to allow for flexibility in model building. MotorNet requires no dependencies outside Python, making it easy to get started with. For instance, it allows training ANNs on typically used motor control models such as a two joint, six muscle, planar arm within minutes on a typical desktop computer. MotorNet is built on PyTorch and therefore can implement any network architecture that is possible using the PyTorch framework. Consequently, it will immediately benefit from advances in artificial intelligence through PyTorch updates. Finally, it is open source, enabling users to create and share their own improvements, such as new effector and network architectures or custom task designs. MotorNets focus on higher order model and task design will alleviate overhead cost to initiate computational projects for new researchers by providing a standalone, ready-to-go framework, and speed up efforts of established computational teams by enabling a focus on concepts and ideas over implementation.

neuroscience↗

Real-Time Observation of Structure and Dynamics during the Liquid-to-Solid Transition of FUS LC

Many of the proteins found in pathological protein fibrils also exhibit tendencies for liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) both in vitro and in cells. The mechanisms underlying the connection between these phase transitions have been challenging to study due to the heterogeneous and dynamic nature of the states formed during the maturation of LLPS protein droplets into gels and solid aggregates. Here, we interrogate the liquid-to-solid transition of the low complexity domain of the RNA binding protein FUS (FUS LC), which has been shown to adopt LLPS, gel-like, and amyloid states. We employ magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR spectroscopy which has allowed us to follow these transitions in real time and with residue specific resolution. We observe the development of {beta}-sheet structure through the maturation process and show that the final state of FUS LC fibrils produced through LLPS is distinct from that grown from fibrillar seeds. We also apply our methodology to FUS LC G156E, a clinically relevant FUS mutant that exhibits accelerated fibrillization rates. We observe significant changes in dynamics during the transformation of the FUS LC G156E construct and begin to unravel the sequence specific contributions to this phenomenon with computational studies of the phase separated state of FUS LC and FUS LC G156E. SignificanceThe presence of protein aggregates and plaques in the brain is a common pathological sign of neurodegenerative disease. Recent work has revealed that many of the proteins found in these aggregates can also form liquid-liquid droplets and gels. While the interconversion from one state to another can have vast implications for cell function and disease, the molecular mechanisms that underlie these processes are not well understood. Here, we combine MAS NMR spectroscopy with other biophysical and computational tools to follow the transitions of the stress response protein FUS. This approach has allowed us to observe real-time changes in structure and dynamics as the protein undergoes these transitions, and to reveal the intricate effects of disease-relevant mutations on the transformation process.

biophysics↗