Karydas, A. M. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2021

A systematic comparison of fibroblasts derived from postmortem human dura mater versus dermal epithelium for neurodegenerative disease modeling

Patient-derived cells hold great promise for precision medicine approaches in human health. Fibroblast cells have been a major source of human cells for reprogramming and differentiating into specific cell types for disease modeling. Such cells can be isolated at various stages during life (presymptomatic, symptomatic, and postmortem) and thus can potentially be used to model different phases of disease progression. In certain circumstances, however, tissues are not collected during life and only postmortem tissues are the only available source of fibroblasts. Fibroblasts cultured from postmortem human dura mater of individuals with neurodegenerative diseases have been suggested as a primary source of cells for in vitro modeling of neurodegenerative diseases. Although fibroblast-like cells from human and mouse dura mater have been previously described, their utility for reprogramming and direct differentiation protocols requires further characterization. In this study, cells derived from dermal biopsies performed in living subjects were compared to cells derived from postmortem dura mater. In two instances, we have isolated and compared dermal and dural cell lines from the same subject. Notably, striking differences between the dermis and dura mater-derived cell lines were found. Compared to dermal fibroblasts, postmortem dura mater-derived cells demonstrated different morphology, exhibited slower growth rates, failed to express fibroblast protein markers, and exhibited significant differences in gene expression profiles. In addition, dura mater-derived cells were found to exhibit a high rate of chromosomal abnormalities, particularly in the loss of the Y chromosome. Our study highlights potential limitations of postmortem human dura mater-derived cells for disease modeling, argues for rigorous karyotyping prior to reprograming, and brings into question the identity of dura mater-derived cells as belonging to a fibroblast lineage.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Non-Coding and Loss-of-Function Coding Variants in TET2 are Associated with Multiple Neurodegenerative Diseases

We conducted genome sequencing to search for rare variation contributing to early onset Alzheimers disease (EOAD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Discovery analysis was conducted on 493 cases and 671 controls of European ancestry. Burden testing for rare variation associated with disease was conducted using filters based on variant rarity (less than 1 in 10,000 or private), computational prediction of deleteriousness (CADD 10 or 15 thresholds), and molecular function (protein loss-of-function only, coding alteration only, or coding plus non-coding variants in experimentally predicted regulatory regions).\n\nReplication analysis was conducted on 16,871 independent cases and 15,941 independent controls. Rare variants in TET2 were enriched in the discovery combined EOAD and FTD cohort (p=6.5x10-8, genome-wide corrected p=0.0037). Most of these variants were canonical loss-of-function or non-coding in predicted regulatory regions. This enrichment replicated across several cohorts of AD and FTD (replication only p=0.0071). The combined analysis odds ratio was 2.2 (95% CI 1.5-3.2) for AD and FTD. The odds ratio for qualifying non-coding variants considered independently from coding variants was 2.1 (95% CI 1.2-3.9). For loss-of-function variants, the combined odds ratio (for AD, FTD, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, which shares clinicopathological overlap with FTD) was 3.2 (95% CI 2.0-5.3). TET2 catalyzes DNA demethylation. Given well-defined changes in DNA methylation that occur during aging, rare variation in TET2 may confer risk for neurodegeneration by altering the homeostasis of key aging-related processes. Additionally, our study emphasizes the relevance of non-coding variation in genetic studies of complex disease.

neuroscience↗