Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kali, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Kali, S..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

How to train your neuron: Developing a detailed, up-to-date, multipurpose model of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells

Anatomically and biophysically detailed models of neurons have been widely used to study information processing in these cells. Most studies focused on understanding specific phenomena, while more general models that aim to capture various cellular processes simultaneously remain rare even though such models are required to predict neuronal behavior under more complex, natural conditions. In this study, we aimed to develop a detailed, data-driven, general-purpose biophysical model of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. We leveraged extensive morphological, biophysical and physiological data available for this cell type, and established a systematic workflow for model construction and validation that relies on our recently developed software tools. The model is based on a high-quality morphological reconstruction and includes a diverse curated set of ion channel models. After incorporating the available constraints on the distribution of ion channels, the remaining free parameters were optimized using the Neuroptimus tool to fit a variety of electrophysiological features extracted from somatic whole-cell recordings. Validation using HippoUnit confirmed the models ability to replicate key electrophysiological features, including somatic voltage responses to current input, the attenuation of synaptic potentials and backpropagating action potentials, and nonlinear synaptic integration in oblique dendrites. Our model also included active dendritic spines, modeled either explicitly or by merging their biophysical mechanisms into those of the parent dendrite. We found that many aspects of neuronal behavior were unaffected by the level of detail in modeling spines, but modeling nonlinear synaptic integration accurately required the explicit modeling of spines. Our data-driven model of CA1 pyramidal cells matching diverse experimental constraints is a general tool for the investigation of the activity and plasticity of these cells and can also be a reliable component of detailed models of the hippocampal network. Our systematic approach to building and validating general-purpose models should apply to other cell types as well. Author SummaryThe brain processes information through the activity of billions of individual neurons. To understand how these cells work, scientists build detailed computer models that reproduce their electrical behavior. These models make it possible to explore situations that are difficult or impossible to test experimentally. However, many existing neuron models were designed to explain only a few specific phenomena, which limits their usefulness in more complex settings. In this study, we developed a comprehensive computer model of a hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neuron, a cell type that plays a central role in learning and memory. We built the model using extensive experimental data and applied automated methods to ensure that it reproduces a broad range of observed neuronal behaviors. We also examined how small structures called dendritic spines--tiny protrusions where most synaptic communication occurs--affect how neurons combine incoming signals. We found that even simplified models without individual spines can capture many aspects of neuronal activity, but understanding more complex forms of signal integration requires modeling spines explicitly. Our work also supports the development of more realistic simulations of brain circuits.

neuroscience↗

Evaluation and comparison of methods for neuronal parameter optimization using the Neuroptimus software framework

Finding optimal parameters for detailed neuronal models is a ubiquitous challenge in neuroscientific research. Recently, manual model tuning has been replaced by automated parameter search using a variety of different tools and methods. However, using most of these software tools and choosing the most appropriate algorithm for a given optimization task require substantial technical expertise, which prevents the majority of researchers from using these methods effectively. To address these issues, we developed a generic platform (called Neuroptimus) that allows users to set up neural parameter optimization tasks via a graphical interface, and to solve these tasks using a wide selection of state-of-the-art parameter search methods implemented by five different Python packages. Neuroptimus also offers several features to support more advanced usage, including the ability to run most algorithms in parallel, which allows it to take advantage of high-performance computing architectures. We used the common interface provided by Neuroptimus to conduct a detailed comparison of more than twenty different algorithms (and implementations) on six distinct benchmarks that represent typical scenarios in neuronal parameter search. We quantified the performance of the algorithms in terms of the best solutions found and in terms of convergence speed. We identified several algorithms, including covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy and particle swarm optimization, that consistently found good solutions in all of our use cases. By contrast, some other algorithms including all local search methods provided good solutions only for the simplest use cases, and failed completely on more complex problems. Finally, we created an online database that allows uploading, querying and analyzing the results of optimization runs performed by Neuroptimus, which enables all researchers to update and extend the current benchmarking study. The tools and analysis we provide should aid members of the neuroscience community to apply parameter search methods more effectively in their research. Author summaryModel fitting is a widely used method in scientific research. It involves tuning the free parameters of a model until its output best matches the corresponding experimental data. Finding the optimal parameter combination can be a difficult task for more complex models with many unknown parameters, and a large variety of different approaches have been proposed to solve this problem. However, setting up a parameter search task and employing an efficient algorithm for its solution requires considerable technical expertise. We have developed a software framework that helps users solve this task, focusing on the domain of detailed models of single neurons. Our open-source software, called Neuroptimus, has a graphical interface that guides users through the steps of setting up a parameter optimization task, and allows them to select from more than twenty different algorithms to solve the problem. We have also compared the performance of these algorithms on a set of six parameter search tasks that are typical in neuroscience, and identified several algorithms that delivered consistently good performance. Finally, we designed and implemented a website that allows users to view and analyze our results and to add their own results to the database.

neuroscience↗

Synaptic and dendritic architecture of two types of hippocampal somatostatin interneurons

GABAergic inhibitory neurons fundamentally shape the activity and plasticity of cortical circuits. A major subset of these neurons contains somatostatin (SOM); these cells play crucial roles in neuroplasticity, learning and memory in many brain areas including the hippocampus, and are implicated in several neuropsychiatric diseases and neurodegenerative disorders. Two main types of SOM-containing cells in area CA1 of the hippocampus are oriens-lacunosum-moleculare (OLM) cells and hippocampo-septal (HS) cells. These cell types show many similarities in their soma-dendritic architecture, but they have different axonal targets, display different activity patterns in vivo and are thought to have distinct network functions. However, a complete understanding of the functional roles of these interneurons requires a precise description of their intrinsic computational properties and their synaptic interactions. In the current study we generated, analyzed and make available several key datasets that enable a quantitative comparison of various anatomical and physiological properties of OLM and HS cells in mouse. The dataset includes detailed scanning electron microscopy-based 3-dimensional reconstructions of OLM and HS cells along with their excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs. Combining this core dataset with other anatomical data, patch-clamp electrophysiology and compartmental modeling, we examined the precise morphological structure, inputs, outputs, and basic physiological properties of these cells. Our results highlight key differences between OLM and HS cells, particularly regarding the density and distribution of their synaptic inputs and mitochondria. For instance, we estimated that an OLM cell receives about 8400, whereas an HS cell about 15600 synaptic inputs, about 16% of which are GABAergic. Our data and models provide insight into the possible basis of the different functionality of OLM and HS cell types and supply essential information for more detailed functional models of these neurons and the hippocampal network.

neuroscience↗

Hippocampal sharp wave-ripples and the associatedsequence replay emerge from structured synapticinteractions in a network model of area CA3

Hippocampal place cells are activated sequentially as an animal explores its environment. These activity sequences are internally recreated ("replayed"), either in the same or reversed order, during bursts of activity (sharp wave-ripples; SWRs) that occur in sleep and awake rest. SWR-associated replay is thought to be critical for the creation and maintenance of long-term memory. In order to identify the cellular and network mechanisms of SWRs and replay, we constructed and simulated a data-driven model of area CA3 of the hippocampus. Our results show that the chain-like structure of recurrent excitatory interactions established during learning not only determines the content of replay, but is essential for the generation of the SWRs as well. We find that bidirectional replay requires the interplay of the experimentally confirmed, temporally symmetric plasticity rule, and cellular adaptation. Our model provides a unifying framework for diverse phenomena involving hippocampal plasticity, representations, and dynamics, and suggests that the structured neural codes induced by learning may have greater influence over cortical network states than previously appreciated.

neuroscience↗

Huygens synchronization of medial septal pacemaker neurons generates hippocampal theta oscillation

Episodic learning and memory retrieval are critically dependent on a hippocampal 4-12 Hz oscillatory clock signal, the theta oscillation. This clock is largely externally paced, by a network of GABAergic neurons in the medial septum (MS). Theoretical studies suggested a range of hypotheses how this network may achieve theta synchrony; however, experimental evidence is still lacking. By recording multiple single MS neurons and hippocampal local field potential oscillations simultaneously, with both acute and chronically implanted silicon probes, we show that MS pacemaker units oscillate at individual frequencies within the theta range in rodents. Synchronization of MS neuron frequencies, accompanied by an elevation of firing rates, was found to parallel hippocampal theta formation in multiple rodent model systems. This suggests a general mechanism for theta synchronization, akin to the synchronization of weakly coupled pendulum clocks observed by Huygens in the 17th century. We optogenetically identified the MS pacemaker units as parvalbumin-expressing GABAergic neurons, while the previously enigmatic MS glutamatergic neurons were mostly theta-activated non-rhythmic cells. Our data were consistent with a network model of partially connected single-compartment inhibitory pacemaker neurons, in which synchronization and de-synchronization in the frequency domain upon waxing and waning tonic excitatory drive was sufficient to toggle MS network output between theta and non-theta states. These results provide experimental and theoretical support to a frequency-synchronization mechanism for pacing hippocampal theta, which may serve as an inspirational prototype for the countless examples of synchronization processes in the central nervous system from Nematoda to Anthropoda to Chordate and Vertebrate phyla.

neuroscience↗

Systematic comparison and automated validation of detailed models of hippocampal neurons

Anatomically and biophysically detailed data-driven neuronal models have become widely used tools for understanding and predicting the behavior and function of neurons. Due to the increasing availability of experimental data from anatomical and electrophysiological measurements as well as the growing number of computational and software tools that enable accurate neuronal modeling, there are now a large number of different models of many cell types available in the literature. These models were usually built to capture a few important or interesting properties of the given neuron type, and it is often unknown how they would behave outside their original context. In addition, there is currently no simple way of quantitatively comparing different models regarding how closely they match specific experimental observations. This limits the evaluation, re-use and further development of the existing models. Further, the development of new models could also be significantly facilitated by the ability to rapidly test the behavior of model candidates against the relevant collection of experimental data. We address these problems for the representative case of the CA1 pyramidal cell of the rat hippocampus by developing an open-source Python test suite, which makes it possible to automatically and systematically test multiple properties of models by making quantitative comparisons between the models and electrophysiological data. The tests cover various aspects of somatic behavior, and signal propagation and integration in apical dendrites. To demonstrate the utility of our approach, we applied our tests to compare the behavior of several different hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cell models from the ModelDB database against electrophysiological data available in the literature, and concluded that each of these models provides a good match to experimental results in some domains but not in others. We also show how we employed the test suite to aid the development of models within the European Human Brain Project (HBP), and describe the integration of the tests into the validation framework developed in the HBP, with the aim of facilitating more reproducible and transparent model building in the neuroscience community. Author summary Anatomically and biophysically detailed neuronal models are useful tools in neuroscience because they allow the prediction of the behavior and the function of the studied cell type under circumstances that are hard to investigate experimentally. However, most detailed biophysical models have been built to capture a few selected properties of the real neuron, and it is often unknown how they would behave under different circumstances, or whether they can be used to successfully answer different scientific questions. To help the modeling community develop better neural models, and make the process of model building more reproducible and transparent, we developed a test suite that enables the comparison of the behavior of models of neurons in the rat hippocampus and their evaluation against experimental data. Applying our tests to several models available in the literature, we show that each model is able to capture some of the important properties of the real neuron but fails to match experimental data in other domains. We also use the test suite in the model development workflow of the European Human Brain Project to aid the construction of better models of hippocampal neurons and networks.

neuroscience↗

Data-driven integration of hippocampal CA1 synapse physiology in silico

The anatomy and physiology of synaptic connections in rodent hippocampal CA1 have been exhaustively characterized in recent decades. Yet, the resulting knowledge remains disparate and difficult to reconcile. Here, we present a data-driven approach to integrate the current state-of-the-art knowledge on the synaptic anatomy and physiology of rodent hippocampal CA1, including axo-dendritic innervation patterns, number of synapses per connection, quantal conductances, neurotransmitter release probability, and short-term plasticity into a single coherent resource. First, we undertook an extensive literature review of paired-recordings of hippocampal neurons and compiled experimental data on their synaptic anatomy and physiology. The data collected in this manner is sparse and inhomogeneous due to the diversity of experimental techniques used by different labs, which necessitates the need for an integrative framework to unify these data. To this end, we extended a previously developed workflow for the neocortex to constrain a unifying in silico reconstruction of the synaptic physiology of CA1 connections. Our work identifies gaps in the existing knowledge and provides a complementary resource towards a more complete quantification of synaptic anatomy and physiology in the rodent hippocampal CA1 region.

neuroscience↗