Biology subjects

Kalc, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Kalc, P..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Segmentation-Based Quality Control of Structural Magnetic Resonance Images

The processing and analysis of magnetic resonance images is highly dependent on the quality of the input data, and systematic differences in quality can consequently lead to loss of sensitivity or biased results. However, varying image properties due to different scanners and acquisition protocols, as well as subject-specific image interferences, such as motion artifacts, can be incorporated in the analysis. A reliable assessment of image quality is therefore essential to identify critical outliers that may bias results. Here we present a quality assessment for structural (T1-weighted) images using tissue classification. We introduce multiple useful image quality measures, standardize them into quality scales and combine them into an integrated structural image quality rating to facilitate the interpretation and fast identification of outliers with (motion) artifacts. The reliability and robustness of the measures are evaluated using synthetic and real datasets. Our study results demonstrate that the proposed measures are robust to simulated segmentation problems and variables of interest such as cortical atrophy, age, sex, brain size and severe disease-related changes, and might facilitate the separation of motion artifacts based on within-protocol deviations. The quality control framework presents a simple but powerful tool for the use in research and clinical settings.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Approximation of bone mineral density and subcutaneous adiposity using T1-weighted images of the human head

Bones and brain are intricately connected and scientific interest in their interaction is growing. This has become particularly evident in the framework of clinical applications for various medical conditions, such as obesity and osteoporosis. The adverse effects of obesity on brain health have long been recognised, but few brain imaging studies provide sophisticated body composition measures. Here we propose to extract the following bone- and adiposity-related measures from T1-weighted MR images of the head: an approximation of skull bone mineral density (BMD), skull bone thickness, and two approximations of subcutaneous fat (i.e., the intensity and thickness of soft non-brain head tissue). The measures pertaining to skull BMD, skull bone thickness, and intensi-ty-based adiposity proxy proved to be reliable (r=.93/.83/.74, p<.001) and valid, with high correlations to DXA-de-rived head BMD values (rho=.70, p<.001) and MRI-derived abdominal subcutaneous adipose volume (rho=.62, p<.001). Thickness-based adiposity proxy had only a low retest reliability (r=.58, p<.001).The outcomes of this study constitute an important step towards extracting relevant non-brain features from available brain scans.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

BrainAGE revisited: Keeping up the pace with deep learning methods

Since the introduction of the BrainAGE method (Franke et al., 2010), novel machine learning methods of brain age prediction have continued to emerge. The idea of estimating the chronological age from magnetic resonance images proved to be an interesting field of research due to the relative simplicity of its interpretation and its potential use as a biomarker of brain health. We revised our previous BrainAGE approach, originally utilising relevance vector regression (RVR), and substituted it with Gaussian process regression (GPR), which enables more stable processing of larger datasets, such as the UK Biobank (UKB). In addition, we extended the global BrainAGE approach to regional BrainAGE, providing spatially specific scores for 5 brain lobes per hemisphere. We tested the performance of the new algorithms under several different conditions and investigated their validity on the ADNI and schizophrenia samples, as well as on a synthetic dataset of neocortical thinning. The results show an improved performance of the reframed global model on the UKB sample with a mean absolute error (MAE) of less than 2 years and a significant difference in BrainAGE between healthy participants and patients with Alzheimers disease and schizophrenia. Moreover, the workings of the algorithm show meaningful effects for a simulated neocortical atrophy dataset. The regional BrainAGE model performed well on two clinical samples, showing disease-specific patterns for different levels of impairment. The results demonstrate that the new improved algorithms provide reliable and valid brain age estimations.

neuroscience↗