Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kaiser, E. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Kaiser, E. A..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Segmentation Matters: Recognizing the Cell Segmentation Challenge in Spatial Transcriptomics

Probe-based in situ hybridization spatial transcriptomics has emerged as a state-of-the-art for neuroscience research. Accurate segmentation of neurons and non-neuronal cells, a critical step for downstream analysis, remains a big challenge. Using human sensory ganglia neurons as an example, we systematically explore this problem. We evaluated multiple automatic segmentation approaches using quantitative performance metrics and downstream results. We show that careful parameter tuning is essential for achieving accurate segmentation; however, even with optimized parameters, different models still yield distinct classes of errors. To mitigate these errors, we propose a manual quality check, which can validate and refine automated segmentation results. As a future direction, integrating multi-modal imaging data with tailored neural networks may further improve segmentation accuracy. In summary, our results argue that each automated segmentation method has distinct strengths, weaknesses, and characteristic error patterns; and that a manual review is necessary.

neuroscience↗

Amplifying and ameliorating light avoidance in mice with photoreceptor targeting and CGRP sensitization

ObjectiveTo determine the photoreceptor basis of light avoidance in mice and assess the effect of CGRP sensitization on this behavior. BackgroundPrior studies have suggested that photophobia is mediated by a subset of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) that contain melanopsin, making them intrinsically photosensitive (ipRGCs). These cells also receive extrinsic input from cones, which can also mediate light sensitivity. Here, we examined whether spectral variation targeting melanopsin or specific cone types in mice could effectively model light sensitivity. Also, we assessed whether sensitizing mice with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) could amplify ipRGC-mediated light avoidance. MethodsLight avoidance behavior was observed in a two-zone chamber illuminated by narrow-band LEDs targeting photopic opsins: 365 nm (UV; rodent S-cone), 460 nm (blue; melanopsin), and 630 nm (red; human L-cone). In a non-targeted assay, we assessed the degree of light avoidance in wildtype C57BL/6J mice to varying intensities (5 to 100%) of the blue and red LEDs. In a targeted assay, mice were given a choice to spend time between zones with differing relative contrast levels (0.50, 0.75, or 1.00) for the targeted photoreceptor(s). This was assessed in two transgenic mice with: 1) human red cone knock-in (RCKI), or 2) adult-onset ablation of M1 ipRGCs (Opn4aDTA). Mice were studied without intervention or following priming with either peripheral CGRP or vehicle administration every other day for 9 days. A primary measure (mean +/- SEM) was the asymptote value (AV). ResultsWildtype mice showed greater light avoidance with increasing light intensity, demonstrating a parametric response. RCKI mice showed avoidance of the high melanopsin (1.00: 0.52 {+/-} 0.08; n = 18) and L-cone (1.00: 0.30 {+/-} 0.11; n = 15) contrast zones but showed a preference for the higher S-cone (1.00: -0.35 {+/-} 0.06; n = 16) contrast zone. These effects decreased with less relative contrast and, thus, contrast dependent. Adding S-cone contrast opposed avoidance to melanopsin (0.10 {+/-} 0.12; n = 14) or L-cone (-0.19 {+/-} 0.10; n = 15) contrast. Ablation of ipRGCs in Opn4aDTA mice attenuated avoidance of melanopsin and preference for S-cone stimulation compared to control littermates. On day 9, CGRP priming led to significantly increased avoidance of melanopsin stimulation (0.58 {+/-} 0.08, n = 21) as compared to vehicle priming (0.26 {+/-} 0.09, n = 22) (F (1,41) = 5.70, p = 0.02). ConclusionsOur findings further support that ipRGCs play a key role in mediating photophobia. This aversive response to light stems from ipRGCs combining excitatory input from intrinsic melanopsin stimulation and extrinsic L-cone input, which can be opposed by extrinsic inhibitory S-cone input. Chronic exposure to CGRP is likely one of many mechanisms in migraine that can amplify ipRGC signals, leading to photophobia. Plain Language SummaryTo better understand light sensitivity, we studied which cells in the eye cause mice to avoid light. We found that mice avoided blue and red light but preferred UV light, and this is the result of a special cell (ipRGCs) in the eye that combines these light signals. Repeated exposure to CGRP, a key nervous system messenger in migraine, increased avoidance of blue light, which may model what happens in people with chronic migraine who experience light sensitivity.

neuroscience↗

Parametric modulation of the blink reflex provides an individual difference measure of trigeminal sensitivity

The primary goal of this study was to develop a parametric model that relates variation in stimulation of the trigeminal nerve to properties of the blink response. We measured blink responses in 17 healthy, adult participants to air puffs directed at the lateral canthus of the eye at five different, log-spaced intensities (3.5 - 60 PSI). Lid position over time was decomposed into amplitude and velocity components. We found that blink amplitude was systematically related to log stimulus intensity, with the relationship well described by a sigmoidal function. The parameters of the model fit correspond to the slope of the function and the stimulus intensity required to produce half of a maximal blink response (the half-response threshold). There was a reliable decrease in the half-response threshold for the contralateral as compared to the ipsilateral blink response. This decrease was consistent across participants despite substantial individual differences in the half-response threshold and slope parameters of the overall sensitivity function, suggesting that the laterality effect arises in the neural circuit subsequent to individual differences in sensitivity. Overall, we find that graded mechanical stimulation of the somatosensory trigeminal afferents elicits a graded response that is well described by a simple parametric model. We discuss the application of parametric measurements of the blink response to the detection of group differences in trigeminal sensitivity. Impact statementO_LIThere has been limited study of how variation in stimulus intensity influences the cutaneous blink response. We describe how variation in the intensity of an air-puff stimulus relates to the amplitude of the blink response using a two-parameter model. The parameters of the model capture individual differences in response, which may be used in future studies to identify population differences in trigeminal sensitivity. C_LI

neuroscience↗

Enhanced reflexive eye closure is mediated by ipRGC signals and is specific to migraine with visual aura

ObjectiveTo assess the contribution of the melanopsin-containing, intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) and the cones to reflexive eye closure as an implicit measure of interictal photophobia in migraine. MethodsWe studied twenty participants in each of three groups: headache-free (HAf) controls, migraine without aura (MwoA), and migraine with visual aura (MwA). Participants viewed spectral pulses that selectively targeted melanopsin, the cones, or their combination while we recorded orbicularis oculi electromyography (OO-EMG) and blinking rate. ResultsTime course analysis of OO-EMG demonstrated that reflexive eye closure was tightly coupled to the spectral pulses. Compared to both the MwoA and HAf control groups, the MwA group had enhanced OO-EMG and blinking activity in response to melanopsin and cone stimulation in combination and in isolation. This response scaled with the contrast of the stimulus. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that ipRGC signals, whether elicited by melanopsin stimulation or from presumed extrinsic cone input, provide the afferent input for light-induced reflexive eye closure in a photophobic state. Participants with migraine and visual aura had a distinctly different response to visual stimulation as compared to the other two groups. This is in contrast to prior findings in this same cohort in whom higher explicit ratings of visual discomfort were found for both MwA and MwoA as compared to controls. Such a dissociation suggests distinct pathophysiology in forms of migraine, interacting with separate neural pathways by which ipRGC signals elicit implicit and explicit signs of visual discomfort.

neuroscience↗

Selective amplification of ipRGC signals accounts for interictal photophobia in migraine

Second only to headache, photophobia is the most debilitating symptom reported by people with migraine. While the melanopsin-containing, intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) are thought to play a role, how cone and melanopsin signals are integrated in this pathway to produce visual discomfort is poorly understood. We studied 60 people: 20 without headache and 20 each with interictal photophobia from migraine with or without aura. Participants viewed pulses of spectral change that selectively targeted melanopsin, the cones, or both, and rated the degree of visual discomfort produced by these stimuli while we also recorded pupil responses. We examined the data within a model that describes how cone and melanopsin signals are weighted and combined at the level of the retina, and how this combined signal is transformed into a rating of discomfort or pupil response. Our results indicate that people with migraine do not differ from headache-free controls in the manner in which melanopsin and cone signals are combined. Instead, people with migraine demonstrate an amplification of integrated ipRGC signals for discomfort. This effect of migraine is selective for ratings of visual discomfort, in that an amplification of pupil responses was not seen in the migraine group, nor were group differences found in surveys of other behaviors putatively linked to ipRGC function (chronotype, seasonal sensitivity, presence of a photic sneeze reflex). By revealing a dissociation in the amplification of discomfort versus pupil response, our findings suggest a post-retinal alteration in processing of ipRGC signals for photophobia in migraine. SignificanceThe melanopsin-containing, intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) may contribute to photophobia in migraine. We measured visual discomfort and pupil responses to cone and melanopsin stimulation--the photoreceptor inputs to the ipRGCs--in people with and without migraine. We find that people with migraine do not differ from those without headaches in how cone and melanopsin signals are weighted and combined to produce visual discomfort. Instead, migraine is associated with an amplification of ipRGC signals for discomfort. This effect of migraine upon ipRGC signals is limited to photophobia, as we did not find an enhancement of pupil responses or a change in other behaviors linked to ipRGC function. Our findings suggest a post-retinal amplification of ipRGC signals for photophobia in migraine.

neuroscience↗

A web-based, branching logic questionnaire for the automated classification of migraine

ObjectiveTo identify migraineurs and headache-free individuals with an online questionnaire and automated analysis algorithm.\n\nMethodsWe created a branching-logic, web-based questionnaire--the Penn Online Evaluation of Migraine (POEM)--to obtain standardized headache history from a previously studied cohort. Responses were analyzed with an automated algorithm to assign subjects to one of several categories based on ICHD-3 (beta) criteria. Following a pre-registered protocol, this result was compared to prior diagnostic classification by a neurologist following a direct interview.\n\nResultsOf 118 subjects contacted, 90 (76%) completed the questionnaire; of these 31 were headache-free, 29 migraine without aura (MwoA), and 30 migraine with aura (MwA). Mean age was 41 {+/-} 6 years and 76% were female. There were no significant demographic differences between groups. The median time to complete the questionnaire was 2.5 minutes. Sensitivity of the POEM tool was 42%, 59%, and 70%, and specificity was 100%, 84%, and 94% for headache-free, MwoA, and MwA, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of the POEM tool for migraine overall (with or without aura), was 83% and 90%, respectively.\n\nConclusionsThe POEM web-based questionnaire, and associated analysis routines, identifies headache-free and migraine subjects with good specificity. It may be useful for classifying subjects for large-scale research studies.\n\nTrial Registration: https://osf.io/sq9ef

epidemiology↗