Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Joses Ho

Publications and source records attributed to Joses Ho.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Finding functional disease-associated non-coding variation using next-generation sequencing

Next generation sequencing has opened the way for the large scale interrogation of cohorts at the whole exome, or whole genome level. Currently, the field largely focuses on potential disease causing variants that fall within coding sequences and that are predicted to cause protein sequence changes, generally discarding non-coding variants. However non-coding DNA makes up ~98% of the genome and contains a range of sequences essential for controlling the expression of protein coding genes. Thus, potentially causative non-coding variation is currently being overlooked. To address this, we have designed an approach to assess variation in one class of non-coding regulatory DNA; the 3'UTRome. Variants in the 3'UTR region of genes are of particular interest because 3'UTRs are responsible for modulating protein expression levels via their interactions with microRNAs. Furthermore they are amenable to large scale analysis as 3'UTR-microRNA interactions are based on complementary base pairing and as such can be predicted in silico at the genome-wide level. We report a strategy for identifying and functionally testing variants in microRNA binding sites within the 3'UTRome and demonstrate the efficacy of this pipeline in a cohort of language impaired children. Using whole exome sequence data from 43 probands, we extracted variants that lay within 3'UTR microRNA binding sites. We identified a common variant (SNP) in a microRNA binding site and found this SNP to be associated with an endophenotype of language impairment (non-word repetition). We showed that this variant disrupted microRNA regulation in cells and was linked to altered gene expression in the brain, suggesting it may represent a risk factor contributing to SLI. This work demonstrates that biologically relevant variants are currently being under-investigated despite the wealth of next-generation sequencing data available and presents a simple strategy for interrogating non-coding regions of the genome. We propose that this strategy should be routinely applied to whole exome and whole genome sequence data in order to broaden our understanding of how non-coding genetic variation underlies complex phenotypes such as neurodevelopmental disorders.

Genetics

Concordance and incongruence in preclinical anxiety models: systematic review and meta-analyses

Rodent defense behavior assays have been widely used as preclinical models of anxiety to study possibly therapeutic anxiety-reducing interventions. However, some proposed anxiety-modulating factors--genes, drugs and stressors--have had discordant effects across different studies. To reconcile the effect sizes of purported anxiety factors, we conducted systematic review and meta-analyses of the literature on ten anxiety-linked interventions, as examined in the elevated plus maze, open field and light-dark box assays. Diazepam, 5-HT1A receptor gene knockout and overexpression, SERT gene knockout and overexpression, pain, restraint, social isolation, corticotropin-releasing hormone and Crhr1 were selected for review. Eight interventions had statistically significant effects on rodent anxiety, while Htr1a overexpression and Crh knockout did not. Evidence for publication bias was found in the diazepam, Htt knockout, and social isolation literatures. The Htr1a and Crhr1 results indicate a disconnect between preclinical science and clinical research. Furthermore, the meta-analytic data confirmed that genetic SERT anxiety effects were paradoxical in the context of the clinical use of SERT inhibitors to reduce anxiety.\n\nHighlightsO_LIMeta-analysis shows eight rodent anxiety factors have at least moderate effects.\nC_LIO_LIPublication bias affects four of the anxiety interventions.\nC_LIO_LIPreclinical rodent anxiety results appear disconnected from clinical efforts.\nC_LIO_LISerotonin transporter gene lesion effects are paradoxical with reuptake inhibitors clinical use.\nC_LI

Animal Behavior and Cognition