Jojic, V. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2018

Conservation and divergence in modules of the transcriptional programs of the human and mouse immune systems

Studies in mouse have shed important light on human hematopoietic differentiation and disease. However, substantial differences between the two species often limit the translation of findings from mouse to human.\n\nHere, we compare previously defined modules of co-expressed genes in human and mouse immune cells based on compendia of genome-wide profiles. We show that the overall modular organization of the transcriptional program is conserved. We highlight modules of co-expressed genes in one species that dissolve or split in the other species. Many of the associated regulatory mechanisms - as reflected by computationally inferred trans regulators, or enriched cis-regulatory elements - are conserved between the species. Nevertheless, the degree of conservation in regulatory mechanism is lower than that of expression, suggesting that distinct regulation may underlie some of the conserved transcriptional responses.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Efficient online-group-screening designs for agent identification

Identifying significant causal agents among a large number of candidates is challenging. When experimental resources are limited, exhaustively screening a large number of agents for the desired effect could incur a large cost and take a substantial amount of time. However, in many large scale experiments, such as high-throughput screening (HTS), the ratio of causal to non-causal agents is usually very low.\n\nIn this paper, we introduce a group-screening strategy to efficiently screen causal agents by grouping them into treatments. Our analysis shows that when a large number of candidates factors are screened and true agent percentage is very low (less than 1%), even in the worst case we could save up to 80% of the experiment runs. In the case where experiments span many rounds, we provide an online version of the group-screening that can determine the best strategy automatically based on the existing results. We applied this method to a real HTS experiment with 50,000 candidates that would require 9 rounds to finish in an exhaustive case. Our analysis showed that by applying the online-group-screening method, in the worst case, we can use 3 rounds and 19.7% (9828/50000) total tests to identify all the agents.\n\nFinally, we show that with minor modifications, this framework extends to more complex agent discovery problems.

bioinformatics↗