Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Jirkof, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Jirkof, P..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Evidence of maternal resilience in two mouse strains in the context of permanent mouse breeding strategies

Breeding female mice represent an essential but often overlooked workforce sustaining biomedical research. Despite their central role, the physiological and behavioral consequences of repeated reproductive cycles have been poorly characterized, in part because breeding animals fall outside the primary focus of laboratory animal welfare efforts, and in part because meaningful welfare readouts for laboratory rodents remain an active area of research. Here we report findings from an exploratory phenotypic study designed to capture a composite picture of maternal health in female mice of two commonly used inbred strains, BALB/cByJ and C57BL/6J, exposed to one, two, or four consecutive cycles of pregnancy and lactation, with age-matched virgin females as controls. Assessments were conducted during the final lactation period and in the five weeks following weaning, spanning behavioral, metabolic, and physiological readouts selected for their known sensitivity to reproductive or environmental challenge. Repeated reproduction altered maternal physiology, most clearly in bone microstructure, which showed progressive and dose-dependent changes across parity levels, and more subtly in body mass, energy balance, and glucose homeostasis. Behavioral readouts of maternal motivation, by contrast, remained largely stable across reproductive load. Strain differences were pervasive, underscoring that reproductive adaptation is not uniform across standard laboratory models and cautioning against generalizing from a single strain. Together, the data suggest that mouse dams demonstrate considerable resilience under intensive breeding conditions, while also highlighting that breeding shapes the maternal body in ways that accumulate across reproductive cycles and deserve greater scientific attention.

physiology↗

A Buprenorphine depot formulation provides effective sustained post-surgical analgesia for 72h in mouse femoral fracture models

Adequate pain management is essential for ethical and scientific reasons in animal experiments and should completely cover the period of expected pain without the need for frequent re-application. However, current depot formulations of Buprenorphine are only available in the USA and have limited duration of action. Recently, a new microparticulate Buprenorphine formulation (BUP-Depot) for sustained release has been developed as an alternative product within Europe. Pharmacokinetics indicate a potential effectiveness for about 72h. Here, we investigated whether the administration of the BUP-Depot ensures continuous and sufficient analgesia in two mouse femoral fracture models and could therefore serve as a potent alternative to the application of Tramadol via drinking water. Both protocols were examined for analgesic effectiveness, side effects on experimental readout, and effects on fracture healing outcomes in male and female C57BL/6N mice. The BUP-Depot provided effective analgesia for 72h, comparable to the effectiveness of Tramadol in drinking water. Fracture healing outcome was not different between analgesic regimes. The availability of a Buprenorphine depot formulation for laboratory animals in Europe would be a beneficial addition for extended pain relief in mice, thereby increasing animal welfare.

animal behavior and cognition↗

One score to rule them all: severity assessment in laboratory mice

Animal welfare and the refinement of experimental procedures are fundamental aspects of biomedical research. They provide the basis for robust experimental designs and reproducibility of results. In many countries, the determination of welfare is a mandatory legal requirement and implies the assessment of the degree of the severity that an animal experiences during an experiment. However, for an effective severity assessment, an objective and exact approach/system/strategy is needed. In light of these demands, we have developed the Relative Severity Assessment (RELSA) score.This comprehensive composite score was established on the basis of physiological and behavioral data from a surgical mouse study. Body weight, the Mouse Grimace Scale score, burrowing behavior, and the telemetry-derived parameters heart rate, heart rate variability, temperature, and general activity were used to investigate the quality of indicating severity during postoperative recovery. The RELSA scores not only revealed individual severity levels but also allowed a comparison of severity in distinct mouse models addressing colitis, sepsis, and restraint stress using a k-means clustering approach with the maximum achieved RELSA scores.We discriminated and classified data from sepsis nonsurvivors into the highest relative severity level. Data from mice after intraperitoneal transmitter implantation and sepsis survivor al were located in the next lower cluster, while data from mice subjected to colitis and restraint stress were placed in the lowest severity cluster. Analysis of individual variables and their combinations revealed model- and time-dependent contributions to severity levels.In conclusion, we propose the RELSA score as a validated tool for objective real-time applicability in severity assessment and as a first step towards a unified and accessible risk assessment tool in biomedical research. As an effective severity assessment system, it will fundamentally improve animal welfare, as well as data quality and reproducibility.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

animal behavior and cognition↗