Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Jie, V. W.

Publications and source records attributed to Jie, V. W..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

From eye anatomy to navigation: a biologically accurate model of bees polarisation vision

Skylight polarisation patterns provide a critical navigational cue for many insects. Bees perceive these patterns through specialised ommatidia in the dorsal rim area of their compound eyes, enabling them to estimate the suns direction and navigate between food sources and the hive. Although polarisation-based navigation has been extensively studied behaviourally, computational models that link DRA anatomy with navigational performance are lacking. Here, we simulate polarisation vision in honeybees (Apis mellifera) and bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using real sky polarisation images to capture biologically relevant skylight properties. Our biologically grounded simulation incorporates species-specific DRA anatomy, including ommatidial optical axis directions, photoreceptor receptive fields, and microvillar orientations. We evaluate navigational accuracy and consistency across sun elevations under two distinct, potentially complementary navigational models: the matched filter, which requires scanning across body orientations to identify the solar axis, and the vector-sum model, which generates instantaneous sun azimuth estimates from a single body orientation, making it independent of active scanning. Matched filter errors in estimating solar axis are below 5{degrees} across most sun elevations and in both species. Absolute errors in the vector-sum model are lower for honeybees than bumblebees (median [~]10{degrees} and [~]30{degrees}, respectively), reflecting differences in DRA anatomy, particularly viewing direction and microvillar arrangement. Both models allow stable course control across most sun elevations in both species, yet the matched filter, being limited to solar axis alignment, only enables positive or negative phototaxis. Overall, this work provides a mechanistic and comparative framework based on realistic DRA anatomy to study polarisation-based navigation, generating testable predictions for insect navigation under natural sky conditions. Author SummaryMany insects, including bees, navigate with the help of skylight polarisation patterns which hold information about the suns position even when it is not visible. Bees detect these patterns through the dorsal rim area (DRA) of their complex eyes. How differences in DRA anatomy between bee species translate into differences in navigational ability has remained unclear. Here, we built a biologically realistic simulation of polarisation vision in honeybees and bumblebees. We used real sky images to examine what polarisation information is available to each species. We then tested two models of sun position estimation based on the polarisation pattern: one that requires the bee to actively scan the sky, and one that generates an instantaneous estimate from a single body orientation. In both species, both models show that accurate sun position estimation and stable navigation are possible using just polarisation information under a wide range of sun elevations. Differences in navigational performance between honeybees and bumblebees arise because the two DRAs look at different parts of the sky. Our results provide a robust framework for understanding how DRA anatomy shapes polarisation-based navigation in bees.

neuroscience↗

Warm or bright - temperature and light microhabitat use in insect pollinators

O_LIEnvironmental heterogeneity in forest understories creates microhabitat niches that differ both spatially and temporally in light intensity and temperature. Do animal communities segregate in relation to these niche dimensions and can this be explained by functional traits? Answering these questions is particularly important for insect pollinators as they play a critical role in maintaining flowering plant biodiversity. C_LIO_LIBumblebees are essential pollinators of high altitude/latitude ecosystems and are particularly sensitive to climate change. In early spring, they forage on bilberry, a keystone species in heterogeneous habitats - hemi- boreal forests. We capitalized on these conditions to study species-specific selection of foraging niches in relation to abiotic conditions. C_LIO_LIWe combined full-day monitoring of bumblebee communities foraging in bilberry-dominated forests with joint species distribution modelling, which showed that temperature conditioned species occurrence, while light intensity explained species abundance. The inclusion of functional traits did not improve the overall explanatory and predictive power of the models. C_LIO_LIOur results suggest that temperature acts as a first filter of the local species pool and that species, once present, partition along a light intensity gradient. This study confirms and extends upon previous findings that microhabitat partitioning may act a mechanism underpinning bumblebee coexistence. It highlights the importance of focusing on micro-scales when studying how species interact with their environment, as this could, for example help improve our ability to predict consequences of global changes. C_LI

ecology↗

Distinct physiological responses of Coccolithus braarudii life cycle phases to light intensity and nutrient availability

Coccolithophores feature a haplo-diplontic life cycle comprised of diploid cells producing heterococcoliths and haploid cells producing morphologically different holococcoliths. These life cycle phases of each species appear to have distinct spatial and temporal distributions in the oceans, with the heavily-calcified heterococcolithophores (HET) often more prevalent in winter and at greater depths, whilst the lightly-calcified holococcolithophores (HOL) are more abundant in summer and in shallower waters. The haplo-diplontic life cycle may therefore allow coccolithophores to expand their ecological niche, switching between life cycle phases to exploit conditions that are more favourable. However, coccolithophore life cycles remain poorly understood and fundamental information on the physiological differences between life cycle phases is required if we are to better understand the ecophysiology of coccolithophores. In this study, we have examined the physiology of HET and HOL phases of the coccolithophore Coccolithus braarudii in response to changes in light and nutrient availability. We found that the HOL phase was more tolerant to high light than the HET phase, which exhibited defects in calcification at high irradiances. The HET phase exhibited defects in coccolith formation under both nitrate (N) and phosphate (P) limitation, whilst no defects in calcification were detected in the HOL phase. The HOL phase grew to a higher cell density under P-limitation than N-limitation, whereas no difference was observed in the maximum cell density reached by the HET phase at these nutrient concentrations. HET cells grown under a light:dark cycle divided primarily in the dark and early part of the light phase, whereas HOL cells continued to divide throughout the 24 h period. The physiological differences may contribute to the distinct biogeographical distributions observed between life cycle phases, with the HOL phase potentially better adapted to high light, low nutrient regimes, such as those found in seasonally stratified surface waters. HighlightsO_LICoccolithus braarudii life cycle phases exhibit different physiological responses. C_LIO_LIThe heavily-calcified heterococcolithophores (HET) life cycle phase is more sensitive to high light. C_LIO_LIThe lightly-calcified holococcolithophores (HOL) life cycle phase may be better suited to growth under low phosphate availability. C_LI

microbiology↗

Novel methodology for localizing and studying the insect dorsal rim area morphology in 2D and 3D

1.Polarized light-based navigation in insects is facilitated by a specialised polarisation-sensitive part of the eye known as the dorsal rim area (DRA). Existing methods to study the anatomy of the DRA are in most cases destructive and very time consuming. Here, we present a novel method that allows for DRA localization using 3D volumetric images acquired through micro-computed tomography in combination with 2D photographs. We used the method on size polymorphic buff-tailed bumblebees, Bombus terrestris. We found that the size of the DRA can be easily acquired from photographs of the dorsal part of the eye. An allometric analysis of the size of the DRA in relation to body size in B. terrestris showed that the DRA region increases with body size but not at the same rate. Using our method, we localised the DRA in a 3D volume rendering of the eye using 2D photos localization of an individuals DRA onto the volumetric image stack of the head allowed for individual-level descriptions of the ommatidial structures (lens, crystalline cones, rhabdoms) to be performed on three different eye regions (DRA, non-DRA, proximate to DRA). The only feature distinctly unique to the DRA ommatidia was the smaller dimension of crystalline cones in comparison to other regions. Using our novel methodology we provide the first individual-level description of DRA ommatidial features and a comparison of how the DRA area varies with body size in bumblebees.

zoology↗