Combined Central and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Improves Functional Recovery of Mixed Peripheral Nerve Injury in a Rat Forelimb Model
IntroductionPeripheral nerve reinnervation following nerve injury is often a slow and incomplete process, resulting in significant morbidity and permanent loss of function of the injured extremity in many patients. Prior studies have shown the efficacy of electrical stimulation to synchronize the axonal regeneration of both motor and sensory neurons in peripheral nerve injury models. Moreover, separate investigations have also shown the use of cranial nerve stimulation, principally the vagus nerve, to improve functional outcomes. However, no study has investigated the synergistic effects of both intraoperative electrical stimulation and cranial nerve stimulation for functional improvement within a peripheral nerve injury model. This investigation quantifies the efficacy of combined intraoperative electrical stimulation and trigeminal nerve stimulation on motor and sensory functional recovery in a rat peripheral nerve injury model. MethodsTwelve adult male Lewis rats were trained in a reach and pull task for a food reward using their right forelimb with baseline force thresholds and percent success of the pull task recorded. Baseline sensory data was retrieved using an automated von Frey monofilament test. All rats underwent surgical transection and 2mm gap repair of their median and ulnar nerve of their right forelimb followed by 1 hour of intraoperative electrical stimulation. Trigeminal nerve stimulation throughout the rehabilitation period was completed via supraorbital nerve headcap electrodes. Motor and sensory data were compared to historic cohorts comprised of sham surgery (no nerve injury), brief intraoperative electrical stimulation, trigeminal nerve stimulation, and a sham peripheral and trigeminal nerve stimulation group. Polarization sensitive optical computed tomography (PS-OCT) was used to assess nerve regeneration in fixed tissue samples. ResultsThe combined cohort of rodents were able to recover to their pre-injury motor function by the third week of rehabilitation, faster than either of the singular electrical stimulation cohorts assessed previously. Moreover, functional sensory data of the combined stim cohort demonstrated no change when compared to their pre-injury baseline. ConclusionsPeripheral nerve electrical stimulation and trigeminal nerve stimulation are two separately acting mechanisms of therapy that employ electric waveforms to improve the functional recovery of injured peripheral nerves. The former acts within the periphery to synchronize axonal growth and regeneration of the injured neurons, while the latter acts centrally to augment neuroplasticity. When used simultaneously in a rodent peripheral nerve injury model, these modalities have shown to build upon each other to deliver a faster functional motor recovery, while sensory recovery outcomes remain to be demonstrated.