Jeffery, C. J. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2019

Quality Matters: Biocuration Experts on the Impact of Duplication and Other Data Quality Issues in Biological Databases

The volume of biological database records is growing rapidly, populated by complex records drawn from heterogeneous sources. A specific challenge is duplication, that is, the presence of redundancy (records with high similarity) or inconsistency (dissimilar records that correspond to the same entity). The characteristics (which records are duplicates), impact (why duplicates are significant), and solutions (how to address duplication), are not well understood. Studies on the topic are neither recent nor comprehensive. In addition, other data quality issues, such as inconsistencies and inaccuracies, are also of concern in the context of biological databases. A primary focus of this paper is to present and consolidate the opinions of over 20 experts and practitioners on the topic of duplication in biological sequence databases. The results reveal that survey participants believe that duplicate records are diverse; that the negative impacts of duplicates are severe, while positive impacts depend on correct identification of duplicates; and that duplicate detection methods need to be more precise, scalable, and robust. A secondary focus is to consider other quality issues. We observe that biocuration is the key mechanism used to ensure the quality of this data, and explore the issues through a case study of curation in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot as well as an interview with an experienced biocurator. While biocuration is a vital solution for handling of data quality issues, a broader community effort is needed to provide adequate support for thorough biocuration in the face of widespread quality concerns.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2019

The CAFA challenge reports improved protein function prediction and new functional annotations for hundreds of genes through experimental screens

The Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA) is an ongoing, global, community-driven effort to evaluate and improve the computational annotation of protein function. Here we report on the results of the third CAFA challenge, CAFA3, that featured an expanded analysis over the previous CAFA rounds, both in terms of volume of data analyzed and the types of analysis performed. In a novel and major new development, computational predictions and assessment goals drove some of the experimental assays, resulting in new functional annotations for more than 1000 genes. Specifically, we performed experimental whole-genome mutation screening in Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aureginosa genomes, which provided us with genome-wide experimental data for genes associated with biofilm formation and motility (P. aureginosa only). We further performed targeted assays on selected genes in Drosophila melanogaster, which we suspected of being involved in long-term memory. We conclude that, while predictions of the molecular function and biological process annotations have slightly improved over time, those of the cellular component have not. Term-centric prediction of experimental annotations remains equally challenging; although the performance of the top methods is significantly better than expectations set by baseline methods in C. albicans and D. melanogaster, it leaves considerable room and need for improvement. We finally report that the CAFA community now involves a broad range of participants with expertise in bioinformatics, biological experimentation, biocuration, and bioontologies, working together to improve functional annotation, computational function prediction, and our ability to manage big data in the era of large experimental screens.

bioinformatics↗