Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Jarvelin, A. I.

Publications and source records attributed to Jarvelin, A. I..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

ADAR1 regulates alternative splicing through an RNA editing-independent mechanism.

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing and alternative splicing occur co-transcriptionally and can regulate and influence each other. The RNA editing enzymes ADAR1 and ADAR2 catalyze A-to-I RNA editing, where it has been shown that expression changes in both RNA editing enzymes exert alternative splicing. ADAR1 manipulation has a significant impact on alternative splicing. While many of those changes are related to changes in their A-to-I RNA editing activity, we speculate that ADAR1 may also influence splicing in an editing-independent manner. In this work, the protein-protein interactome of ADAR1 revealed that ADAR1 interacts with spliceosome co-factors and auxiliary splicing regulators. We confirmed that ADAR1 does not only influence splicing through editing but also throughout editing-independent functions with even greater penetrance. We show that ADAR1 modulates the splicing of transcripts encoding splicing factors, with many of these splice sites overlapping with known splicing changes induced by the splicing factor ACIN1, suggesting indirect effects upon ADAR1 expression. In summary, we show that ADAR1 can regulate splicing in an editing-independent manner, which likely occurs by widespread alteration of the splicing factor isoform landscape.

molecular biology↗

Absolute quantitation of individual SARS-CoV-2 RNA molecules: a new paradigm for infection dynamics and variant differences

Despite an unprecedented global research effort on SARS-CoV-2, early replication events remain poorly understood. Given the clinical importance of emergent viral variants with increased transmission, there is an urgent need to understand the early stages of viral replication and transcription. We used single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridisation (smFISH) to quantify positive sense RNA genomes with 95% detection efficiency, while simultaneously visualising negative sense genomes, sub-genomic RNAs and viral proteins. Our absolute quantification of viral RNAs and replication factories revealed that SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA is long-lived after entry, suggesting that it avoids degradation by cellular nucleases. Moreover, we observed that SARS-CoV-2 replication is highly variable between cells, with only a small cell population displaying high burden of viral RNA. Unexpectedly, the B.1.1.7 variant, first identified in the UK, exhibits significantly slower replication kinetics than the Victoria strain, suggesting a novel mechanism contributing to its higher transmissibility with important clinical implications. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/450133v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (55K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10f7bf1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@192214dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c84916org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1366287_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG In briefBy detecting nearly all individual SARS-CoV-2 RNA molecules, we quantified viral replication and defined cell susceptibility to infection. We discovered that a minority of cells show significantly elevated viral RNA levels and observed slower replication kinetics for the Alpha variant relative to the Victoria strain. Highlights O_LISingle molecule quantification of SARS-CoV-2 replication uncovers early infection kinetics C_LIO_LIThere is substantial heterogeneity between cells in rates of SARS-CoV-2 replication C_LIO_LIGenomic RNA is stable and persistent during the initial stages of infection C_LIO_LIB.1.1.7 variant replicates more slowly than the Victoria strain C_LI

microbiology↗

Understanding RNP remodelling uncovers RBPs functionally required for viral replication

The compendium of RNA-binding proteins (RBPome) has been greatly expanded by the development of RNA-interactome capture (RNA-IC). However, it remains unknown how responsive is the RBPome and whether these responses are biologically relevant. To answer these questions, we created comparative RNA-IC to analyse cells challenged with an RNA virus, called sindbis (SINV). Strikingly, the virus altered the activity of 245 RBPs, many of which were newly discovered by RNA-IC. Mechanistically, alterations in RNA binding upon SINV infection are caused by changes in the subcellular localisation of RBPs and RNA availability. Moreover, RBPome responses are crucial, as perturbation of dynamic RBPs modulates the capacity of the virus to infect the cell. For example, ablation of XRN1 causes cells to be refractory to infection, while GEMIN5 moonlights as a novel antiviral factor. Therefore, RBPome remodelling provides a mechanism by which cells can extensively rewire gene expression in response to physiological cues.\n\nHIGHLIGHTSO_LIA quarter of the RBPome remodels upon SINV infection.\nC_LIO_LIThe remodelling is caused by changes in protein localisation and RNA availability.\nC_LIO_LIRewiring of the RBPome is crucial for viral infection efficacy.\nC_LIO_LIWe discover RBPs with previously unknown anti- or pro-viral activity.\nC_LI

molecular biology↗

Regulating prospero mRNA Stability Determines When Neural Stem Cells Stop Dividing

During Drosophila and vertebrate brain development, the conserved transcription factor Prospero/Prox1 is an important regulator of the transition between proliferation and differentiation. Prospero level is low in neural stem cells and their immediate progeny, but is upregulated in larval neurons and it is unknown how this process is controlled. Here, we use single molecule fluorescent in situ hybridisation to show that larval neurons selectively transcribe a long prospero mRNA isoform containing a 15 kb 3 untranslated region, which is bound in the brain by the conserved RNA-binding protein Syncrip/hnRNPQ. Syncrip binding increases the mRNA stability of the long prospero isoform, which allows an upregulation of Prospero protein production. Our findings highlight a regulatory strategy involving alternative polyadenylation followed by differential post-transcriptional regulation.

developmental biology↗