Biology subjects

Jano, S. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Jano, S. L..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Predictive influences on memory encoding: investigating oscillations and the N400 event-related potential component

To effectively function in an ever-changing environment, the brain is proposed to make predictions about upcoming information. However, the association between prediction and memory formation and the role of between-subject neural variability in this relationship is unclear. To shed light on the relationship between prediction and memory, the present study reanalysed data from Jano, Chatburn, and colleagues (2024). In the original experiment, participants were exposed to naturalistic images in predictable and unpredictable four-item sequences, after which their memory was tested using an old/new paradigm. In the present analysis (N = 46), N400 amplitude and oscillatory power during learning was measured to gauge processes related to prediction error and memory encoding, respectively. This activity was compared with subsequent memory outcomes and individual alpha frequency (IAF) calculated at rest. Linear mixed-effects regressions revealed an alpha power subsequent memory effect that was not related to the amplitude of the N400, suggesting that memory encoding may occur independently of the level of prediction error. Notably, IAF influenced the relationship between theta power, N400 amplitude and subsequent memory, implying that the electrophysiological conditions for successful memory formation differ between individuals. Consequently, the degree to which prediction errors (presumably gauged via the N400) drive memory encoding could depend on inter-individual variability in intrinsic neural activity. These findings emphasise the flexible nature of memory, whilst having potential implications for prediction error-driven accounts of learning.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Individual alpha frequency modulates prediction error-driven memory encoding

Prediction and memory are strongly intertwined, with predictions relying on memory retrieval, whilst also influencing memory encoding. However, it is unclear how predictability influences explicit memory performance, and how individual neural factors may modulate this relationship. The current study sought to investigate the effect of predictability on memory processing with an analysis of the N400 event-related potential in a context extending beyond language. Participants (N = 48, females = 33) completed a study-test paradigm where they first viewed predictable and unpredictable four-item ABCD sequences of outdoor scene images, whilst their brain activity was recorded using electroencephalography (EEG). Subsequently, their memory for the images was tested, and N400 patterns during learning were compared with memory outcomes. Behavioural results revealed better memory for images in predictable sequences in contrast to unpredictable sequences. Memory was also strongest for predictable images in the B position, suggesting that when processing longer sequences, the brain may prioritise the data deemed most informative. Strikingly, greater N400 amplitudes during learning were associated with enhanced memory at test for individuals with low versus high individual alpha frequencies (IAFs). In light of the relationship between the N400 and stimulus predictability, this finding may imply that predictive processing differs between individuals to influence the extent of memory encoding. Finally, exploratory analyses provided evidence for a later positivity that was predictive of subsequent memory performance. Ultimately, the results highlight the complex and interconnected relationship between predictive processing and memory, whilst shedding light on the accumulation of predictions across longer sequences.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Expecting the unexpected: A reanalysis of a multi-laboratory study provides evidence for prediction in language

The extent to which the brain predicts upcoming information during language processing remains controversial. To shed light on this debate, the present study reanalysed Nieuwland and colleagues (2018) replication of DeLong et al. (2005). Participants (N = 356) viewed sentences containing articles and nouns of varying predictability, while their electroencephalogram was recorded. We measured event-related potentials (ERPs) preceding the critical words (namely the semantic prediction potential; SPP), in conjunction with post-word N400 patterns and individual neural metrics. ERP activity was compared with two measures of word predictability: cloze probability and lexical surprisal. In contrast to prior literature, SPP amplitudes did not increase as cloze probability increased, suggesting that the component may not reflect prediction during natural language processing. Initial N400 results at the article provided evidence against phonological prediction in language, in line with Nieuwland and colleagues findings. Strikingly however, when the surprisal of the prior words in the sentence was included in the analysis, increases in article surprisal were associated with increased N400 amplitudes, consistent with prediction accounts. This relationship between surprisal and N400 amplitude was not observed when the surprisal of the two prior words was low, suggesting that expectation violations at the article may be overlooked under highly predictable conditions. Individual alpha frequency (IAF) also modulated the relationship between article surprisal and the N400, emphasising the importance of individual neural factors for prediction. The present study extends upon existing neurocognitive models of language and prediction more generally, by illuminating the flexible and subject-specific nature of predictive processing.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Sleep Enhances Neural Representations of True and False Memories: An Event-Related Potential Study

Episodic memory is reconstructive and is thus prone to false memory formation. Although false memories are proposed to develop via associative processes, the nature of their neural representations, and the effect of sleep on false memory processing is currently under debate. The present research employed the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm and a daytime nap to determine whether semantic false memories and true memories could be differentiated using event-related potentials (ERPs). We also sought to illuminate the role of sleep in memory formation and learning, with the use of a daytime nap. Healthy participants (N = 34, 28F, mean age = 23.23, range = 18-33) completed the DRM task with the learning and recognition phases separated by either a 2hr daytime nap or an equivalent wake period. Linear mixed modelling revealed larger LPC amplitudes for true memories in contrast to false memories, and larger P300 amplitudes for false compared to true memories. Those in the nap group also exhibited larger LPC and P300 amplitudes than participants in the wake group. Additionally, a larger P300 amplitude at delayed recognition (following a consolidation opportunity) was associated with increased true memory accuracy. These findings are argued to be reflective of sleeps ability to promote pattern separation and pattern completion, with true memories arising from distinct memory traces, and false memories arising from thematic extraction and overlap in neural representations. The present research supports the perspective that both true and false memories are reflective of adaptive memory processes, whilst also suggesting that P300 amplitude affects episodic memory accuracy.

neuroscience↗