Biology subjects

Jamshidi, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Jamshidi, F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2019

Copy-number variation contributes 9% of pathogenicity in the inherited retinal degenerations

PurposeCurrent sequencing strategies can genetically solve 55-60% of inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) cases, despite recent progress in sequencing. This can partially be attributed to elusive pathogenic variants (PVs) in known IRD genes, including copy number variations (CNVs), which we believe are a major contributor to unsolved IRD cases.\n\nMethodsFive hundred IRD patients were analyzed with targeted next generation sequencing (NGS). The NGS data was used to detect CNVs with ExomeDepth and gCNV and the results were compared to CNV detection with a SNP-Array. Likely causal CNV predictions were validated by quantitative (q)PCR.\n\nResultsLikely disease-causing single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small indels were found in 55.8% of subjects. PVs in USH2A (11.6%), RPGR (4%) and EYS (4%) were the most common. Likely causal CNVs were found in an additional 8.8% of patients. Of the three CNV detection methods, gCNV showed the highest accuracy. Approximately 30% of unsolved subjects had a single likely PV in a recessive IRD gene.\n\nConclusionsCNV detection using NGS-based algorithms is a reliable method that greatly increases the genetic diagnostic rate of IRDs. Experimentally validating CNVs helps estimate the rate at which IRDs might be solved by a CNV plus a more elusive variant.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2017

Contribution of structural and intronic mutations to RPGRIP1-mediated inherited retinal dystrophies.

PurposeWith the advent of gene therapies for inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs), genetic diagnostics will have an increasing role in clinical decision-making. Yet the genetic cause of disease cannot be identified using exon-based sequencing for a significant portion of patients. We hypothesized that non-coding mutations contribute significantly to the genetic causality of IRDs and evaluated patients with single coding mutations in RPGRIP1 to test this hypothesis.\n\nMethodsIRD families underwent targeted panel sequencing. Unsolved cases were explored by whole exome and genome sequencing looking for additional mutations. Candidate mutations were then validated by Sanger sequencing, quantitative PCR, and in vitro splicing assays in two cell lines analyzed through amplicon sequencing.\n\nResultsAmong 1722 families, three had biallelic loss of function mutations in RPGRIP1 while seven had a single disruptive coding mutation. Whole exome and genome sequencing revealed potential non-coding mutations in these seven families. In six, the non-coding mutations were shown to lead to loss of function in vitro.\n\nConclusionNon-coding mutations were identified in 6 of 7 families with single coding mutations in RPGRIP1. The results suggest that non-coding mutations contribute significantly to the genetic causality of IRDs and RPGRIP1-mediated IRDs are more common than previously thought.

genomics↗