Biology subjects

Jahfari, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Jahfari, S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Dopaminergic medication reduces striatal sensitivity to negative outcomes in Parkinson’s disease

Reduced levels of dopamine in Parkinsons disease (PD) contribute to changes in learning, resulting from the loss of midbrain dopamine neurons that transmit a teaching signal to the striatum. Dopamine medication used by PD patients has previously been linked to either behavioral changes during learning itself or adjustments in approach and avoidance behavior after learning. To date, however, very little is known about the specific relationship between dopaminergic medication-driven differences during learning and subsequent changes in approach/avoidance tendencies in individual patients. We assessed 24 PD patients on and off dopaminergic medication and 24 healthy controls (HC) performing a probabilistic reinforcement learning task, while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. During learning, medication in PD reduced an overemphasis on negative outcomes. When patients were on medication, learning rates were lower for negative (but not positive) outcomes and concurrent striatal BOLD responses showed reduced prediction error sensitivity. Medication-induced shifts in negative learning rates were predictive of changes in approach/avoidance choice patterns after learning, and these changes were accompanied by striatal BOLD response alterations. These findings highlight dopamine-driven learning differences in PD and provide new insight into how changes in learning impact the transfer of learned value to approach/avoidance responses in novel contexts.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Pupil responses as indicators of value-based decision-making

Pupil responses have been used to track cognitive processes during decision-making. Studies have shown that in these cases the pupil reflects the joint activation of many cortical and subcortical brain regions, also those traditionally implicated in value-based learning. However, how the pupil tracks value-based decisions and reinforcement learning is unknown. We combined a reinforcement learning task with a computational model to study pupil responses during value-based decisions, and decision evaluations. We found that the pupil closely tracks reinforcement learning both across trials and participants. Prior to choice, the pupil dilated as a function of trial-by-trial fluctuations in value beliefs. After feedback, early dilation scaled with value uncertainty, whereas later constriction scaled with reward prediction errors. Our computational approach systematically implicates the pupil in value-based decisions, and the subsequent processing of violated value beliefs. These dissociable influences provide an exciting possibility to non-invasively study ongoing reinforcement learning in the pupil.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Scene complexity modulates degree of feedback activity during object recognition in natural scenes

Object recognition is thought to be mediated by rapid feed-forward activation of object-selective cortex, with limited contribution of feedback. However, disruption of visual evoked activity beyond feed-forward processing stages has been demonstrated to affect object recognition performance. Here, we unite these findings by reporting that the detection of target objects in natural scenes is selectively characterized by enhanced feedback when these objects are embedded in high complexity scenes. Human participants performed an animal target detection task on scenes with low, medium or high complexity as determined by a biologically plausible computational model of low-level contrast statistics. Three converging lines of evidence indicate that feedback was enhanced during categorization of scenes with high, but not low or medium complexity. First, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity in early visual cortex (V1) was selectively enhanced for target objects in scenes with high complexity. Second, event-related potentials (ERPs) evoked by high complexity scenes were selectively enhanced from 220 ms after stimulus-onset. Third, behavioral performance deteriorated for highly complex scenes when participants were pressed for time, but not when they could process the scenes fully and thereby benefit from the enhanced feedback. Formal modeling of the reaction time distributions revealed that object information accumulated more slowly for high complexity scenes (resulting in more errors especially for fast decisions), and directly related to the build-up of the feedback activity that was observed exclusively for high complexity scenes. Together, these results suggest that while feed-forward activity may suffice for simple scenes, the brain employs recurrent processing more adaptively in naturalistic settings, using minimal feedback for sparse, coherent scenes and increasing feedback for complex, fragmented scenes.\n\nAuthor summaryHow much neural processing is required to detect objects of interest in natural scenes? The astonishing speed of object recognition suggests that fast feed-forward buildup of perceptual activity is sufficient. However, this view is contradicted by findings that show that disruption of slower neural feedback leads to decreased detection performance. Our study unites these discrepancies by identifying scene complexity as a critical driver of neural feedback. We show how feedback is enhanced for complex, cluttered scenes compared to simple, well-organized scenes. Moreover, for complex scenes, more feedback is associated with better performances. These findings relate the flexibility of neural processes to perceptual decision-making by demonstrating that the brain dynamically directs neural resources based on the complexity of real-world visual inputs.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Cross-task contributions of fronto-basal ganglia circuitry in response inhibition and conflict-induced slowing

Why are we so slow in choosing the lesser of two evils? We considered whether such slowing relates to uncertainty about the value of these options, which arises from the tendency to avoid them during learning, and whether such slowing relates to fronto-subthalamic inhibitory control mechanisms. 49 participants performed a reinforcement-learning task and a stop-signal task while fMRI was recorded. A reinforcement-learning model was used to quantify learning strategies. Individual differences in lose-lose slowing related to information uncertainty due to sampling, and independently, to less efficient response inhibition in the stop-signal task. Neuroimaging analysis revealed an analogous dissociation: subthalamic nucleus (STN) BOLD activity related to variability in stopping latencies, whereas weaker fronto-subthalamic connectivity related to slowing and information sampling. Across tasks, fast inhibitors increased STN activity for successfully cancelled responses in the stop task, but decreased activity for lose-lose choices. These data support the notion that fronto-STN communication implements a rapid but transient brake on response execution, and that slowing due to decision uncertainty could result from an inefficient release of this \"hold your horses\" mechanism.

neuroscience↗