Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Isaia, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Isaia, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Functional convergence underground? The scale-dependency of community assembly processes in European cave spiders

Understanding how species assemble into communities is a central tenet in ecology. One of the most elusive questions is the relative contribution of environmental filtering versus limiting similarity. Important advances in this area have been achieved by looking at communities through a functional lens (i.e., the traits they express), so as to derive principles valid across species pools. Yet, even using traits in lieu of taxonomy, the issue remains controversial because i) environmental filtering and limiting similarity often act simultaneously in shaping communities; and ii) their effect is scale-dependent. We exploited the experimental arena offered by caves, island-like natural laboratories characterized by largely constant environmental gradients and a limited diversity of species and interactions. Leveraging uniquely available data on distribution and traits for European cave spiders, we tested explicit hypotheses about variations in community assembly rules across ecological gradients and scales. We demonstrate that environmental filtering and limiting similarity shape cave communities acting on trait evolution in opposing directions. These effects are strongly scale dependent, varying along multiple environmental gradients. Conversely, the effect of geography on trait composition is weak, indicating that trait turnover in space happens primarily by substitution of species pursuing similar functions due to strong environmental filters. Our findings reconcile contrasted views about the relative importance of the two main mechanisms shaping patterns of biodiversity, and provide a conceptual foundation to account for scaling effects in the study of community assembly.

ecology↗

An expert-based global assessment of threats and conservation measures for subterranean ecosystems

Subterranean ecosystems host unique biodiversity and deliver important services to humans. Yet, available data for subterranean ecosystems are limited in space and/or taxonomic scope and global monitoring programs are absent, preventing practitioners to develop effective conservation and management strategies. Expert opinion may help overcome some of these knowledge gaps. We designed a global survey to quantify the importance of anthropogenic impacts and conservation measures for subterranean ecosystems. We obtained 279 responses from 155 experts in different subterranean habitats, taxa, and regions. Experts perceived surface habitat change, direct habitat destruction (e.g., pollution, damming, mining), and climate change as the most relevant threats impacting subterranean ecosystems. Legislation, land protection, and education were scored as the most effective conservation measures, whereas species-level conservation was deemed less relevant. Whenever lacking hard data, expert opinion may be an effective, largely available, yet often overlooked source of information to implement timely conservation interventions for subterranean ecosystems.

ecology↗

Media representation of spiders may exacerbate arachnophobic sentiments by framing a distorted perception of risk

ABSTRACTSpiders are able to arouse strong emotional reactions in humans. While spider bites are statistically rare events, our perception is skewed towards the potential harm spiders can cause to humans. We examined the human dimension of spiders through the lens of traditional media, by analysing more than 300 spider-related news published online in Italian newspapers between 2010 and 2020. We observed a recent, exponential increase in the frequency of the news, particularly those focused on medically important spiders – the Mediterranean black widow (Latrodectus tredecimguttatus) and the Mediterranean recluse (Loxosceles refescens). The news quality was generally poor: 70% contained different types of error, 32% were exaggerated, and in virtually none was an expert consulted. Overstated news referring to spider bites were significantly more shared on social media, thus contributing to frame a distorted perception of the risk associated with a spider bite and possibly reducing general public tolerance of spiders.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

scientific communication and education↗