Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Irastorza-Azcarate, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Irastorza-Azcarate, I..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Specialised super-enhancer networks in stem cells and neurons

Super-enhancers (SEs) are clusters of enhancers with high transcriptional activity that play essential roles in defining cell identity through regulation of nearby genes. SEs preferentially form multiway chromatin interactions with other SEs and highly transcribed regions in embryonic stem cells. However, the properties of the interacting SEs and their specific contributions to complex regulatory interactions in differentiated cell types remain poorly understood. Here, we compare the structural and functional properties of SEs between embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and dopaminergic neurons (DNs) by combining Genome Architecture Mapping (GAM), chromatin accessibility, histone modification, and transcriptome data. Most SEs are cell-type specific and establish extensive pairwise and multiway chromatin interactions with other SEs and genes with cell-type specific expression. SE interactions span megabase genomic distances and frequently connect distant topologically associating domains. By applying network centrality analyses, we detected SEs with different hierarchical importance. Highest network centrality SEs contain binding motifs for cell-type specific transcription factors, and are candidate regulatory hubs. The functional heterogeneity of SEs is also highlighted by their organisation into modular sub-networks that differ in structure and spatial scale between ESCs and DNs, with more specific and strongly connected SE modules in post-mitotic neurons. Our results uncover both the high complexity and specificity of SE-based 3D regulatory networks and provide a resource for prioritizing SEs with potential roles in transcriptional regulation and disease.

genomics↗

A single dose of cocaine rewires the 3D genome structure of midbrain dopamine neurons

Midbrain dopamine neurons (DNs) respond to a first exposure to addictive drugs and play key roles in chronic drug usage1-3. As the synaptic and transcriptional changes that follow an acute cocaine exposure are mostly resolved within a few days4,5, the molecular changes that encode the long-term cellular memory of the exposure within DNs remain unknown. To investigate whether a single cocaine exposure induces long-term changes in the 3D genome structure of DNs, we applied Genome Architecture Mapping and single nucleus transcriptomic analyses in the mouse midbrain. We found extensive rewiring of 3D genome architecture at 24 hours past exposure which remains or worsens by 14 days, outlasting transcriptional responses. The cocaine-induced chromatin rewiring occurs at all genomic scales and affects genes with major roles in cocaine-induced synaptic changes. A single cocaine exposure triggers extensive long-lasting changes in chromatin condensation in post-synaptic and post-transcriptional regulatory genes, for example the unfolding of Rbfox1 which becomes most prominent 14 days post exposure. Finally, structurally remodeled genes are most expressed in a specific DN sub-type characterized by low expression of the dopamine auto-receptor Drd2, a key feature of highly cocaine-sensitive cells. These results reveal an important role for long-lasting 3D genome remodelling in the cellular memory of a single cocaine exposure, providing new hypotheses for understanding the inception of drug addiction and 3D genome plasticity.

genomics↗

Extensive folding variability between homologous chromosomes in mammalian cells

Genetic variation and 3D chromatin structure have major roles in gene regulation. Due to challenges in mapping chromatin conformation with haplotype-specific resolution, the effects of genetic sequence variation on 3D genome structure and gene expression imbalance remain understudied. Here, we applied Genome Architecture Mapping (GAM) to a hybrid mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) line with high density of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). GAM resolved haplotype-specific 3D genome structures with high sensitivity, revealing extensive allelic differences in chromatin compartments, topologically associating domains (TADs), long-range enhancer-promoter contacts, and CTCF loops. Architectural differences often coincide with allele-specific differences in gene expression, mediated by Polycomb repression. We show that histone genes are expressed with allelic imbalance in mESCs, are involved in haplotype-specific chromatin contact marked by H3K27me3, and are targets of Polycomb repression through conditional knockouts of Ezh2 or Ring1b. Our work reveals highly distinct 3D folding structures between homologous chromosomes, and highlights their intricate connections with allelic gene expression.

genomics↗

Comparison of the Hi-C, GAM and SPRITE methods by use of polymer models of chromatin

Powerful technologies have been developed to probe chromatin 3D physical interactions genome-wide, such as Hi-C, GAM and SPRITE. Due to their intrinsic differences and without a benchmarking reference, it is currently difficult to assess how well each method represents the genome 3D structure and their relative performance. Here, we develop a computational approach to implement Hi-C, GAM and SPRITE in-silico to compare the three methods in a simplified, yet controlled framework against known polymer 3D structures. We test our approach on models of three 6-Mb genomic regions, around the Sox9 and the HoxD genes in mouse ES cells, and around the Epha4 gene in mouse CHLX-12 cells. The model-derived contact matrices consistently match Hi-C, GAM and SPRITE experiments. We show that in-silico Hi-C, GAM and SPRITE average data are overall faithful to the 3D structures of the polymer models. We find that the inherent variability of model single-molecule 3D conformations and experimental efficiency differently affect the contact data of the different methods. Similarly, the noise-to-signal levels vary with genomic distance differently in in-silico Hi-C, SPRITE and GAM. We benchmark the performance of each technology in bulk and in single-cell experiments, and identify the minimal number of cells required for replicates to return statistically consistent chromatin contact measures. Under the same experimental conditions, SPRITE requires the lowest number of cells, Hi-C is close to SPRITE, while GAM is the most reproducible method to capture interactions at large genomic distances.

biophysics↗

GAMIBHEAR: whole-genome haplotype reconstruction from Genome Architecture Mapping data

MotivationGenome Architecture Mapping (GAM) was recently introduced as a digestion- and ligation-free method to detect chromatin conformation. Orthogonal to existing approaches based on chromatin conformation capture (3C), GAMs ability to capture both inter- and intra-chromosomal contacts from low amounts of input data makes it particularly well suited for allele-specific analyses in a clinical setting. Allele-specific analyses are powerful tools to investigate the effects of genetic variants on many cellular phenotypes including chromatin conformation, but require the haplotypes of the individuals under study to be known a-priori. So far however, no algorithm exists for haplotype reconstruction and phasing of genetic variants from GAM data, hindering the allele-specific analysis of chromatin contact points in non-model organisms or individuals with unknown haplotypes. ResultsWe present GAMIBHEAR, a tool for accurate haplotype reconstruction from GAM data. GAMIBHEAR aggregates allelic co-observation frequencies from GAM data and employs a GAM-specific probabilistic model of haplotype capture to optimise phasing accuracy. Using a hybrid mouse embryonic stem cell line with known haplotype structure as a benchmark dataset, we assess correctness and completeness of the reconstructed haplotypes, and demonstrate the power of GAMIBHEAR to infer accurate genome-wide haplotypes from GAM data. AvailabilityGAMIBHEAR is available as an R package under the open source GPL-2 license at https://bitbucket.org/schwarzlab/gamibhear Maintainer: julia.markowski@mdc-berlin.de

bioinformatics↗