Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ip, Y. C. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Ip, Y. C. A..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Multi-omic Environmental Monitoring Reveals When Molecular Signals Reflect Living Biology

Environmental molecular monitoring has transformed biodiversity detection, yet most methods capture only species presence through amplified DNA fragments, missing the biological information encoded in native nucleic acids. Here we show that a single shotgun Oxford Nanopore sequencing library from water can be read through several independent biological lenses, and that each class of molecule (environmental RNA, CpG methylation, and bulk DNA) differs in its environmental persistence, which sets the window over which signal can be trusted. Sampling Pacific salmon spawning runs, we simultaneously recovered environmental RNA indicating fresh biological input, CpG methylation profiles reflecting age demographics, and pathogen signatures reflecting health. Environmental RNA tracked spawning phenology, qPCR corroborated the timing of fresh biological input over the weeks sampled, and methylation-based age inference held only while fresh DNA dominated, a condition we term the 'Freshness Gate.' Because environmental water is not a tissue sample, we detect functional transcripts as evidence of biological input but do not infer differential gene expression, and we read methylation state but do not infer biological age outside the Freshness Gate. Variance partitioning is consistent with biological freshness, rather than technical factors such as fragment length or sequencing depth, structuring environmental methylation, though these comparisons did not reach significance at nine time points. Comparable dynamics were observed in Chinook salmon, with timing offsets following their distinct spawning season. By defining when environmental molecules faithfully encode living biology and when degradation decouples signal from current state, our framework sets practical and theoretical boundaries for multi-omic environmental monitoring.

ecology↗

Vertebrate Biodiversity via eDNA at the air-water interface

Although aquatic, aerial, and terrestrial habitats are often treated as separate ecological systems, these environments exist along a continuum of connectivity: flows of biomass and energy routinely create linkages across water and air, blurring traditional boundaries. Here, we use eDNA sequencing to illustrate and quantify the movement of trace genetic information between water and air. We collected 27 paired air-and-water samples from two urban-wildland interface sites using passive air sampling and active water filtering. Metabarcoding with the MiFish-U 12S marker recovered 35 vertebrate taxa, 40% of which were detected in both water and air, ranging from the strictly aquatic salmon to wholly terrestrial cottontail rabbit. This reciprocal relationship suggests that eDNA pools form within each partition (water or air), with the probability of transfer governed by DNA concentration. In this view, detecting aquatic eDNA in the air is not contamination or stochastic noise but an expected, repeatable phenomenon. Logistic models confirm that higher abundance in one medium predicts spillover into the other. For instance, peaks in Coho and Chinook salmon eDNA align within 24 hours, demonstrating that passive air sampling reflects the temporal abundance trends of the most common aquatic species. In contrast, low-read-abundance taxa appear only sporadically, implying that rare detections are the first to drop out of cross-medium transfer and therefore demand intensified sampling in their primary habitat. Together, our findings bridge the conventional separation of aquatic and airborne eDNA and establish a unified, non-invasive framework for holistic vertebrate monitoring at the land-water interface. This approach offers transformative potential for conservation, invasive-species early warning, and One Health surveillance.

molecular biology↗

Real-time Malaria Detection in the Amazon Rainforest via Drone-Collected eDNA and Portable qPCR

Emerging zoonotic parasites such as Plasmodium spp. in remote ecosystems demand rapid, field-deployable surveillance. We developed a drone-based environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling approach integrated with a portable quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay for in situ detection of Plasmodium DNA. Field trials confirmed malaria parasite DNA in canopy swabs, coinciding spatially with acoustic detection of howler monkeys (Alouatta sp.), suspected reservoir hosts. No Anopheles mosquitoes were captured in simultaneously deployed insect traps. The end-to-end workflow, from drone deployment to diagnostic readout, averaged 1.5 hours per assay, required only basic mobile-laboratory infrastructure, and bypassed cold-chain logistics. This rapid, non-invasive method delivers actionable surveillance data in real-time, enabling near-real-time trigger points for vector-control interventions and clinical response in remote settings. By merging environmental genomics with portable diagnostics, we establish a scalable One Health framework adaptable to diverse vector-borne parasites and ecosystems, with potential for early detection and spillover risk mitigation in under-monitored, high-risk environments.

molecular biology↗

Fast, Flexible, Feasible: A Transparent Framework for Evaluating eDNA Workflow Trade-offs in Resource-Limited Settings

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis enables biodiversity monitoring by detecting organisms from trace genetic material, but high reagent costs, cold-chain logistics, and computational demands limit its broader use, particularly in resource-limited settings. To address these challenges and improve accessibility, we systematically evaluated multiple workflow components, including four DNA extraction methods, two primer sets, three Nanopore basecalling models, and two demultiplexing pipelines. Across 144 workflow combinations tested in an aquarium with 15 fish species, we mapped trade-offs between cost, sensitivity, and processing speed using a hierarchical Bayesian model, to assess where time and resource savings are possible without compromising detection. Workflows using the Qiagen Blood and Tissue (BT) extraction kit provided the highest sensitivity, recovering all 15 species of the sampled fish community within 3-5 hours of Oxford Nanopore sequencing when paired with MiFish-U primer set and high-accuracy (HAC) basecalling. Chelex, an alternative lower-cost extraction method, required extended sequencing (>24 hours) to reach comparable species-detection rates. DirectPCR and QuickExtract offered field-friendly extraction alternatives that achieved comparable recovery in [~]10-12 hours, though their cost-effectiveness varied. While the MarVer1 primer was designed to broaden vertebrate detection, it recovered the same fish species as MiFish-U, though with fewer total reads. Real-time sequencing trials (0-61 hours) revealed that high-efficiency workflows (BT + HAC) reached detection plateaus rapidly, indicating sequencing time can be reduced without sacrificing accuracy. The OBITools4 bioinformatics pipeline enabled automated demultiplexing but discarded more reads than an alternative, ONTbarcoder2.3, which retained low-abundance taxa at the cost of manual curation. Rather than identifying a single "best" workflow, this study provides a transparent decision framework for prioritizing cost, speed, and sensitivity in eDNA applications, supporting scalable, cost-effective eDNA monitoring, in resource-limited settings.

molecular biology↗

Primed and ready: Nanopore metabarcoding can now recover highly accurate consensus barcodes that are generally indel-free

BackgroundDNA metabarcoding applies high-throughput sequencing approaches to generate numerous DNA barcodes from mixed sample pools for mass species identification and community characterisation. To date, however, most metabarcoding studies employ second-generation sequencing platforms like Illumina, which are limited by short read lengths and longer turnaround times. While third-generation platforms such as the MinION (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) can sequence longer reads and even in real-time, application of these platforms for metabarcoding has remained scarce due to the relatively high read error rate as well as the paucity of specialised software for processing such reads. FindingsWe show that this is no longer the case by performing nanopore-based metabarcoding on 34 zooplankton bulk samples with amplicon_sorter, benchmarking the results against conventional Illumina MiSeq sequencing. The R10.3 sequencing chemistry and super accurate (SUP) basecalling model reduced raw read error rates to [~]4%, and consensus calling with amplicon_sorter (without further error correction) generated metabarcodes that were [≤]1% erroneous. Although Illumina recovered a higher number of molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) than nanopore sequencing (589 vs. 471), we found no significant differences in the zooplankton communities inferred between the sequencing platforms. Indeed, the same ecological conclusions were obtained regardless of the sequencing platform used. Moreover, 406 of 444 (91.4%) shared MOTUs between Illumina and nanopore were found to be indel-free. ConclusionsCollectively, our results illustrate the viability of nanopore metabarcoding for characterising communities, and paves the way for greater utilisation of nanopore sequencing in various metabarcoding applications.

zoology↗

MinION-in-ARMS: Nanopore Sequencing To Expedite Barcoding Of Specimen-Rich Macrofaunal Samples From Autonomous Reef Monitoring Structures

Autonomous Reef Monitoring Structure (ARMS) are standardised devices for sampling biodiversity in complex marine benthic habitats such as coral reefs. When coupled with DNA sequencing, these devices greatly expand our ability to document marine biodiversity. Unfortunately, the existing workflow for processing macrofaunal samples (>2-mm) in the ARMS pipeline—which involves Sanger sequencing—is expensive, laborious, and thus prohibitive for ARMS researchers. Here, we propose a faster, more cost-effective alternative by demonstrating a successful application of the MinION-based barcoding approach on the >2mm-size fraction of ARMS samples. All data were available within 3.5–4 h, and sequencing costs relatively low at approximately US$3 per MinION barcode. We sequenced the 313-bp fragment of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) for 725 samples on both MinION and Illumina platforms, and retrieved 507–584 overlapping barcodes. MinION barcodes were highly accurate (~99.9%) when compared with Illumina reference barcodes. Molecular operational taxonomic units inferred between MinION and Illumina barcodes were consistently stable, and match ratios demonstrated highly congruent clustering patterns (≥0.96). Our method would make ARMS more accessible to researchers, and greatly expedite the processing of macrofaunal samples; it can also be easily applied to other small-to-moderate DNA barcoding projects (<10,000 specimens) for rapid species identification and discovery.View Full Text

zoology↗