Biology subjects

Ioumpa, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Ioumpa, K..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Endogenous opioid receptor system mediates costly altruism in the human brain

Functional neuroimaging studies suggest that a large-scale brain network transforms others pain into its vicarious representation in the observer, potentially modulating helping behaviour. The neuromolecular basis of individual differences in vicarious pain and helping, however, have remain poorly understood. Here we investigated the role of the endogenous -opioid receptor (MOR) system - known for its role in analgesia and sociability - in altruistic costly helping. MOR density was measured with high-affinity agonist radioligand [11C]carfentanil. In a separate fMRI experiment, participants could choose to donate money to reduce the pain of the confederate who was subjected to electric shocks of varying intensity. We found that subjects were in general willing to engage in costly helping, and haemodynamic activity in amydala, anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex, striatum, primary motor cortex, primary somatosensory cortex, and thalamus increased when participants witnessed the pain of others. These haemodynamic responses were negatively associated with MORs availability in the striatolimbic and cortical emotion circuits. In turn, haemodynamic responses during helping were positively associated with MOR availability in the anterior cingulate cortex and hippocampus. Altogether these data suggest that the endogenous MOR system modulates the processing of altruistic behaviour and costly helping in the human brain.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Neural mechanisms of costly helping in the general population and mirror-pain synesthetes

Helping others often comes with a cost to ourselves. It has been argued that experiencing the pain of others motivates helping. Here we investigate how individuals that report somatically feeling the pain of others (mirror-pain synesthetes) differ from those that do not, when deciding to help and reduce someones pain conveyed through different modalities. Mirror-pain synesthetes and participants who do not report such everyday life experiences witnessed a confederate expressing pain and could decide to reduce the intensity by donating money. Measuring brain activity using fMRI confirmed our initial hypothesis: self-reported mirror-pain synesthetes increased their donation more steeply, as the intensity of the observed pain increased, and their somatosensory brain activity (in SII and the adjacent IPL) activity was more tightly associated with donation when the pain of other was conveyed by the reactions of the pain-receiving hand. For all participants, in a condition where the pain was conveyed by facial expressions, activation in insula, SII and MCC correlated with the trial by trial donation made, while SI and MTG activation was correlated with the donation in the Hand condition. These results further inform us about the role of empathy in costly helping, the underlying neural mechanism, and individual variability.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Commanding or being a simple intermediary: how does it affect moral behavior and related brain mechanisms?

History has shown that fractioning operations between several individuals along a hierarchical chain allows diffusing responsibility between components of the chain, which has the potential to disinhibit antisocial actions. Here, we present two studies, one using fMRI (Study 1) and one using EEG (Study 2), designed to help understand how commanding or being in an intermediary position impacts the sense of agency and empathy for pain. In the age of military drones, we also explored whether commanding a human or robot agent influences these measures. This was done within a single behavioral paradigm in which participants could freely decide whether or not to send painful shocks to another participant in exchange for money. In Study 1, fMRI reveals that activation in social cognition and empathy-related brain regions was equally low when witnessing a victim receive a painful shock while participants were either commander or simple intermediary transmitting an order, compared to being the agent directly delivering the shock. In Study 2, results indicated that the sense of agency did not differ between commanders and intermediary, no matter if the executing agent was a robot or a human. However, we observed that the neural response over P3 was higher when the executing agent was a robot compared to a human. Source reconstruction of the EEG signal revealed that this effect was mediated by areas including the insula and ACC. Results are discussed regarding the interplay between the sense of agency and empathy for pain for decision-making.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Intracortical human recordings reveal intensity coding for the pain of others in the insula

Based on neuroimaging data, the insula is considered important for people to empathize with the pain of others, whether that pain is perceived through facial expressions or the sight of limbs in painful situations. Here we present the first report of intracranial electroencephalographic (iEEG) recordings from the insulae collected while 7 presurgical epilepsy patients rated the intensity of a womans painful experiences viewed in movies. In two separate conditions, pain was deduced from seeing facial expressions or a hand being slapped by a belt. We found that broadband activity in the 20-190 Hz range correlated with the trial-by-trial perceived intensity in the insula for both types of stimuli. Using microwires at the tip of a selection of the electrodes, we additionally isolated 8 insular neurons with spiking that correlated with perceived intensity. Within the insula, we found a patchwork of locations with differing selectivities within our stimulus set, some representing intensity only for facial expressions, others only for the hand being hit, and others for both. That we found some locations with intensity coding only for faces, and others only for hand across simultaneously recorded locations suggests that insular activity while witnessing the pain of others cannot be entirely reduced to a univariate salience representation. Psychophysics and the temporal properties of our signals indicate that the timing of responses encoding intensity for the sight of the hand being hit are best explained by kinematic information; the timing of those encoding intensity for facial expressions are best explained by shape information in the face. In particular, the furrowing of the eyebrows and the narrowing of the eyes of the protagonist in the movies suffice to predict both the rating of and the timing of the neuronal response to the facial expressions. Comparing the broadband activity in the iEEG signal with spiking activity and an fMRI experiment with similar stimuli revealed a consistent spatial organization for the representation of intensity from our hand stimuli, with stronger intensity representation more anteriorly and around neurons with intensity coding. In contrast, for the facial expressions, we found that the activity at the three levels of measurement do not coincide, suggesting a more disorganized representation. Together, our intracranial recordings indicate that the insula encodes, in a partially intermixed layout, both static and dynamic cues from different body parts that reflect the intensity of pain experienced by others.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Obeying orders reduces vicarious brain activation towards victim's pain

Past historical events and experimental research have shown complying with the orders from an authority has a strong impact on peoples behaviour. However, the mechanisms underlying how obeying orders influences moral behaviours remain largely unknown. Here, we test the hypothesis that when male and female humans inflict a painful stimulation to another individual, their empathic response is reduced when this action complied with the order of an experimenter (coerced condition) in comparison with being free to decide to inflict that pain (free condition). We observed that even if participants knew that the shock intensity delivered to the victim was exactly the same during coerced and free conditions, they rated the shocks as less painful in the coerced condition. MRI results further indicated that obeying orders reduced activity associated with witnessing the shocks to the victim in the ACC, insula/IFG, TPJ, the MTG and dorsal striatum (including the caudate and the putamen) as well as neural signatures of vicarious pain in comparison with being free to decide. We also observed that participants felt less responsible and showed reduced activity in a multivariate neural guilt signature in the coerced than in the free condition, suggesting that this reduction of neural response associated with empathy could be linked to a reduction of felt responsibility and guilt. These results highlight that obeying orders has a measurable influence on how people perceive and process others pain. This may help explain how peoples willingness to perform moral transgressions is altered in coerced situations.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Neuro-computational mechanisms of action-outcome learning under moral conflict

Predicting how actions result in conflicting outcomes for self and others is essential for social functioning. We tested whether Reinforcement Learning Theory captures how participants learn to choose between symbols that define a moral conflict between financial self-gain and other-pain. We tested whether choices are better explained by model-free learning (decisions based on combined historical values of past outcomes), or model-based learning (decisions based on the current value of separately expected outcomes) by including trials in which participants know that either self-gain or other-pain will not be delivered. Some participants favored options benefiting themselves, others, preventing other-pain. When removing the favored outcome, participants instantly altered their choices, suggesting model-based learning. Computational modelling confirmed choices were best described by model-based learning in which participants track expected values of self-gain and other-pain separately, with an individual valuation parameter capturing their relative weight. This valuation parameter predicted costly helping in an independent task. The expectations of self-gain and other-pain were also biased: the favoured outcome was associated with more differentiated symbol-outcome probability reports than the less favoured outcome. FMRI helped localize this bias: signals in the pain-observation network covaried with pain prediction errors without linear dependency on individual preferences, while the ventromedial prefrontal cortex contained separable signals covarying with pain prediction errors in ways that did and did not reflected individual preferences.

neuroscience↗