Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

International FTD-Genomics Consortium (IFGC),

Publications and source records attributed to International FTD-Genomics Consortium (IFGC),.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Gene expression imputation provides insight into the genetic architecture of frontotemporal dementia

The etiology of genetically sporadic frontotemporal dementia is poorly understood. Although genome-wide association studies for frontotemporal dementia have identified a small number of candidate risk regions, most of the risk genes remain largely unknown. To identify candidate genes with predicted expression levels associated with frontotemporal dementia, we integrated genome-wide summary statistics with external reference gene expression data, using a transcriptome-wide association studies approach. FUSION software was used to leverage summary statistics on frontotemporal dementia (n=2,340 cases, n=7,252 controls) and clinical subtypes (behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia n=1,337 cases/2,754 controls; semantic dementia n=308 cases/616 controls; progressive non-fluent aphasia n=269 cases/538 controls, frontotemporal dementia with motor neuron disease n=200 cases/400 controls) from the International Frontotemporal Dementia Genomics Consortium with 53 expression quantitative loci tissue type panels (n=12,205 from five consortia). Significance was assessed using a 5% false discovery rate threshold. We identified 73 significant gene-tissue associations for frontotemporal dementia, representing 44 unique genes in 34 tissue types. Most significant findings were derived from dorsolateral prefrontal cortex splicing data (n=19 genes, 26%). Furthermore, the 17q21.31 inversion locus contained 23 significant associations, representing six unique genes whose predicted expression associated with frontotemporal dementia. Other top hits included SEC22B on chromosome 1, a gene involved in vesicle trafficking, TRGV5 on chromosome 17 and ZNF302 on chromosome 19. A single gene finding was observed for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (i.e., RAB38 on chromosome 11) with evidence from multiple tissue types. For the other clinical subtypes no significant associations were observed. We used transcriptome-wide association studies to prioritize candidate genes for frontotemporal dementia and identified a number of specific genes, including potential novel candidate genes (such as SEC22B) and previously reported risk regions (e.g., 17q.21.31). Most significant associations were observed in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, despite the modest sample size of the gene expression reference panel of this tissue type. This suggests that our findings are specific to frontotemporal dementia and are likely to be biologically relevant highlights of genes at different frontotemporal dementia risk loci that are contributing to the disease pathology.

genetics↗

Genetic factors influencing a neurobiological substrate for psychiatric disorders

A retrospective meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging voxel-based morphometry studies proposed that reduced gray matter volumes in the dorsal anterior cingulate and the left and right anterior insular cortex - areas that constitute hub nodes of the salience network - represent a common substrate for major psychiatric disorders. Here, we investigated the hypothesis that the common substrate serves as an intermediate phenotype to detect genetic risk variants relevant for psychiatric disease. To this end, after a data reduction step, we conducted genome-wide association studies of a combined common substrate measure in four population-based cohorts (n=2,271), followed by meta-analysis and replication in a fifth cohort (n=865). After correction for covariates, the heritability of the common substrate was estimated at 0.50 (standard error 0.18). The top single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs17076061 was associated with the common substrate at genome-wide significance and replicated, explaining 1.2% of the common substrate variance. This SNP mapped to a locus on chromosome 5q35.2 harboring genes involved in neuronal development and regeneration. In follow-up analyses, rs17076061 was not robustly associated with psychiatric disease, and no overlap was found between the broader genetic architecture of the common substrate and genetic risk for major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia. In conclusion, our study identified that common genetic variation indeed influences the common substrate, but that these variants do not directly translate to increased disease risk. Future studies should investigate gene-by-environment interactions and employ functional imaging to understand how salience network structure translates to psychiatric disorder risk.

genetics↗