Biology subjects

Ingason, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Ingason, A..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

CNValidatron, automated validation of CNV calls using computer vision

BackgroundLarge rare copy number variants (CNVs) are a main source of genetic variation in the genome and are important in both evolution and disease risk. CNVs can be detected using different data sources, including genome sequencing, genotyping arrays and quantitative PCR experiments, but in most large cohorts, genotyping arrays remain the most prevalent source. Current methods to call CNVs from genotyping array data suffer from high false positive rates and while multiple approaches, including QC filtering, visual inspection of intensity tracks, and wet-lab validation are commonly applied to counter this problem, such methods are often non-specific (QC filtering) or inefficient (visual and wet-lab validations) at a genome-wide scale. ResultsWe have assembled the largest collection of human-verified CNV calls using visual validation, totaling almost 60,000 calls from 22,500 samples from three cohorts genotyped on several different arrays. Across all cohorts our visual validation found the majority of CNV calls to be false positive (53.7%) or unclear (9.7%). The false positive fraction varied substantially across datasets and genomic regions, and we show that existing filtering methods based on QC metrics are inefficient in removing false calls. Given the supremacy of visual validation over existing filtering methods in controlling the false positive fraction, we used a subset of our visual validation dataset to train a convolutional neural network to automate the validation of CNVs through machine vision. We tested the efficacy of the model using the remainder of the dataset and found the performance exceeded 90% in most measures, approximating that of a human analyst. Cross-validation with genome sequencing data found our visual validation to be highly accurate, with only 1.7% of calls supported by the sequencing dataset deemed as false by the human analyst, and a further 7.5% deemed as unclear. ConclusionsVisual inspection is the only effective validation approach for CNV calls. Our model is capable of automating this task at scale with very high accuracy, as shown by testing both within-sample and out-of-sample. The software is available as an R package at https://github.com/SinomeM/CNValidatron_fl.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2024

Steppe Ancestry in western Eurasia and the spread of the Germanic Languages

Today, Germanic languages, including German, English, Frisian, Dutch and the Nordic languages, are widely spoken in northwest Europe. However, key aspects of the assumed arrival and diversification of this linguistic group remain contentious1-3. By adding 712 new ancient human genomes we find an archaeologically elusive population entering Sweden from the Baltic region by around 4000 BP. This population became widespread throughout Scandinavia by 3500 BP, matching the contemporaneous distribution of Palaeo-Germanic, the Bronze Age predecessor of Proto-Germanic4-6. These Baltic immigrants thus offer a new potential vector for the first Germanic speakers to arrive in Scandinavia, some 800 years later than traditionally assumed7-12. Following the disintegration of Proto-Germanic13-16, we find by 1650 BP a southward push from Southern Scandinavia into presumed Celtic-speaking areas, including Germany, Poland and the Netherlands. During the Migration Period (1575-1375 BP), we see this ancestry representing West Germanic Anglo-Saxons in Britain, and Langobards in southern Europe. We find a related large-scale northward migration into Denmark and South Sweden corresponding with historically attested Danes and the expansion of Old Norse. These movements have direct implications for multiple linguistic hypotheses. Our findings show the power of combining genomics with historical linguistics and archaeology in creating a unified, integrated model for the emergence, spread and diversification of a linguistic group.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2022

The Selection Landscape and Genetic Legacy of Ancient Eurasians

The Holocene (beginning [~]12,000 years ago) encompassed some of the most significant changes in human evolution, with far-reaching consequences for the dietary, physical, and mental health of present-day populations. Using a dataset of >1600 imputed ancient genomes 1, we modelled the selection landscape during the transition from hunting and gathering, to farming and pastoralism across West Eurasia. We identify major selection signals related to metabolism, including that selection at the FADS cluster began earlier than previously reported, and that selection near the LCT locus predates the emergence of the lactase persistence allele by thousands of years. We also find strong selection in the HLA region, possibly due to increased exposure to pathogens during the Bronze Age. Using ancient individuals to infer local ancestry tracts in >400,000 samples from the UK Biobank, we identify widespread differences in the distribution of Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Bronze Age ancestries across Eurasia. By calculating ancestry-specific polygenic risk scores, we show that height differences between Northern and Southern Europe are associated with differential Steppe ancestry, rather than selection, and that risk alleles for mood-related phenotypes are enriched for Neolithic farmer ancestry, while risk alleles for diabetes and Alzheimers disease are enriched for Western Hunter-gatherer ancestry. Our results suggest that ancient selection and migration were major contributors to the distribution of phenotypic diversity in present-day Europeans.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Accuracy of haplotype estimation and whole genome imputation affects complex trait analyses in complex biobanks

Sample recruitment for research consortia, hospitals, biobanks, and personal genomics companies span years, necessitating genotyping in batches, using different technologies. As marker content on genotyping arrays varies systematically, integrating such datasets is non-trivial and its impact on haplotype estimation (phasing) and whole genome imputation, necessary steps for complex trait analysis, remains under-evaluated. Using the iPSYCH consortium dataset, comprising 130,438 individuals, genotyped in two stages, on different arrays, we evaluated phasing and imputation performance across multiple phasing methods and data integration protocols. While phasing accuracy varied both by choice of method and data integration protocol, imputation accuracy varied mostly between data integration protocols. We demonstrate an attenuation in imputation accuracy within samples of non-European origin, highlighting challenges to studying complex traits in diverse populations. Finally, imputation errors can modestly bias association tests and reduce predictive utility of polygenic scores. This is the largest, most comprehensive comparison of data integration approaches in the context of a large psychiatric biobank.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2022

Population Genomics of Stone Age Eurasia

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene1-5. To investigate the cross-continental impacts we shotgun-sequenced 317 primarily Mesolithic and Neolithic genomes from across Northern and Western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from >1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a Great Divide genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers (HGs) were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the impact of the neolithisation was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacements of HGs in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, while east of the Urals relatedness remained high until [~]4,000 BP, consistent with persistence of localised HG groups. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive but we demonstrate that HGs from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya-groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora Culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a Neolithic steppe cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Genomic evaluation of circulating proteins for drug target characterisation and precision medicine

Circulating proteins are vital in human health and disease and are frequently used as biomarkers for clinical decision-making or as targets for pharmacological intervention. By mapping and replicating protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) for 90 cardiovascular proteins in over 30,000 individuals, we identified 467 pQTLs for 85 proteins. The pQTLs were used in combination with other sources of information to evaluate known drug targets, and suggest new target candidates or repositioning opportunities, underpinned by a) causality assessment using Mendelian randomization, b) pathway mapping using trans-pQTL gene assignments, and c) protein-centric polygenic risk scores enabling matching of plausible target mechanisms to sub-groups of individuals enabling precision medicine.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

Impute.me: an open source, non-profit tool for using data from DTC genetic testing to calculate and interpret polygenic risk scores.

To date, interpretation of genomic information has focused on single variants conferring disease risk, but most disorders of major public concern have a polygenic architecture. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) give a single measure of disease liability by summarising disease risk across hundreds of thousands of genetic variants. They can be calculated in any genome-wide genotype data-source, using a prediction model based on genome-wide summary statistics from external studies. As genome-wide association studies increase in power, the predictive ability for disease risk will also increase. While PRS are unlikely ever to be fully diagnostic, they may give valuable medical information for risk stratification, prognosis, or treatment response prediction. Public engagement is therefore becoming important on the potential use and acceptability of PRS. However, the current public perception of genetics is that it provides Yes/No answers about the presence/absence of a condition, or the potential for developing a condition, which in not the case for common, complex disorders with of polygenic architecture. Meanwhile, unregulated third-party applications are being developed to satisfy consumer demand for information on the impact of lower risk variants on common diseases that are highly polygenic. Often applications report results from single SNPs and disregard effect size, which is highly inappropriate for common, complex disorders where everybody carries risk variants. Tools are therefore needed to communicate our understanding of genetic predisposition as a continuous trait, where a genetic liability confers risk for disease. Impute.me is one such a tool, whose focus is on education and information on common, complex disorders with polygenetic architecture. Its research-focused open-source website allows users to upload consumer genetics data to obtain PRS, with results reported on a population-level normal distribution. Diseases can only be browsed by ICD10-chapter-location or alphabetically, thus prompting the user to consider genetic risk scores in a medical context of relevance to the individual. Here we present an overview of the implementation of the impute.me site, along with analysis of typical usage-patterns, which may advance public perception of genomic risk and precision medicine.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

Population genomics of the Viking world

The Viking maritime expansion from Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden) marks one of the swiftest and most far-flung cultural transformations in global history. During this time (c. 750 to 1050 CE), the Vikings reached most of western Eurasia, Greenland, and North America, and left a cultural legacy that persists till today. To understand the genetic structure and influence of the Viking expansion, we sequenced the genomes of 442 ancient humans from across Europe and Greenland ranging from the Bronze Age (c. 2400 BC) to the early Modern period (c. 1600 CE), with particular emphasis on the Viking Age. We find that the period preceding the Viking Age was accompanied by foreign gene flow into Scandinavia from the south and east: spreading from Denmark and eastern Sweden to the rest of Scandinavia. Despite the close linguistic similarities of modern Scandinavian languages, we observe genetic structure within Scandinavia, suggesting that regional population differences were already present 1,000 years ago. We find evidence for a majority of Danish Viking presence in England, Swedish Viking presence in the Baltic, and Norwegian Viking presence in Ireland, Iceland, and Greenland. Additionally, we see substantial foreign European ancestry entering Scandinavia during the Viking Age. We also find that several of the members of the only archaeologically well-attested Viking expedition were close family members. By comparing Viking Scandinavian genomes with present-day Scandinavian genomes, we find that pigmentation-associated loci have undergone strong population differentiation during the last millennia. Finally, we are able to trace the allele frequency dynamics of positively selected loci with unprecedented detail, including the lactase persistence allele and various alleles associated with the immune response. We conclude that the Viking diaspora was characterized by substantial foreign engagement: distinct Viking populations influenced the genomic makeup of different regions of Europe, while Scandinavia also experienced increased contact with the rest of the continent.

genetics↗