Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ikegami, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Ikegami, T..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the occipital cortex interferes with foot movements in blind individuals

Research has shown that the occipital cortex can be reorganized and repurposed for nonvisual perception and cognitive functions following visual loss in blind individuals. However, no studies have directly examined the involvement of the visual cortex in motor function. Here, we show that a rhythmic foot movement performed by acquired blind individuals can be disrupted by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to their primary and secondary visual cortex (V1/V2). This disruptive effect was absent for congenitally blind or sighted individuals. As a control, TMS to the neck muscles of acquired blind individuals confirms that this disruptive effect was not caused solely by the sensory (tactile/auditory) sensations accompanying the stimulation. Our results provide the direct evidence that functional repurposing of the human visual cortex is not restricted to perception and cognitive functions but also extends to motor function. Moreover, our findings suggest the nessecity of the visual experience before visual loss for the functional reorganization of the visual cortex for motor function. Significance statementThe brain can adapt remarkably after sensory loss. One striking example is that after visual loss, the visual cortex--deprived of visual input--is often reused for nonvisual perception and higher cognition. Here, we show that it can also support motor control. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we transiently disrupted processing in the visual cortex while participants performed rhythmic foot movements. This disruption impaired performance in people who became blind after birth, but not in sighted individuals or those blind from birth. These findings demonstrate that the visual cortex can take on a motor function after vision is lost, but only with prior visual experience.

neuroscience↗

Hierarchical motor adaptations negotiate failures during force field learning

Humans have the amazing ability to learn the dynamics of the body and environment to develop motor skills. Traditional motor studies using arm reaching paradigms have viewed this ability as the process of internal model adaptation. However, the behaviors have not been fully explored in the case when reaches fail to attain the intended target. Here we examined human reaching under two force fields types; one that induces failures (i.e., target errors), and the other that does not. Our results show the presence of a distinct failure-driven adaptation process that enables quick task success after failures, and before completion of internal model adaptation, but that can result in persistent changes to the undisturbed trajectory. These behaviors can be explained by considering a hierarchical interaction between internal model adaptation and the failure-driven adaptation of reach direction. Our findings suggest that movement failure is negotiated using hierarchical motor adaptations by humans.

neuroscience↗

Prediction error induced motor contagions in human behaviors

Motor contagions refer to implicit effects on ones actions induced by observation of others actions. Motor contagions are believed to be induced simply by action observation and cause an observers action to become similar to the observed action. In contrast, here we report a new motor contagion that is induced only when the observation is accompanied by prediction errors-differences between actions one observes and those he/she predicts or expects. Moreover, this contagion may not manifest as a similarity between ones own and observed actions. In our experiment, observation of the same action induced distinct motor contagions, depending on whether prediction errors are present or not. In the absence of prediction errors, similarly to previous reports, participants actions changed to become similar to the observed action, while in the presence of prediction errors, their actions changed to diverge away from it. Our results suggest distinct effects of action observation and action prediction on human actions.

neuroscience↗