Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Ihlefeld, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Ihlefeld, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Human Sound Localization Depends on Sound Intensity: Implications for Sensory Coding

A fundamental question of human perception is how we perceive target locations in space. Through our eyes and skin, the activation patterns of sensory organs provide rich spatial cues. However, for other sensory dimensions, including sound localization and visual depth perception, spatial locations must be computed by the brain. For instance, interaural time differences (ITDs) of the sounds reaching the ears allow listeners to localize sound in the horizontal plane. Our experiments tested two prevalent theories on how ITDs affect human sound localization: 1) the labelled-line model, encoding space through tuned representations of spatial location; versus 2) the hemispheric-difference model, representing space through spike-rate distances relative to a perceptual anchor. Unlike the labelled-line model, the hemispheric-difference model predicts that with decreasing intensity, sound localization should collapse toward midline reference, and this is what we observed behaviorally. These findings cast doubt on models of human sound localization that rely on a spatially tuned map. Moreover, analogous experimental results in vision indicate that perceived depth depends upon the contrast of the target. Based on our findings, we propose that the brain uses a canonical computation of location across sensory modalities: perceived location is encoded through population spike rate relative to baseline.

neuroscience

Spatial Release from Masking: Evidence from Near Infrared Spectroscopy

Informational masking (IM) can greatly reduce speech intelligibility, but the neural mechanisms underlying IM are not understood. Binaural differences between target and masker can improve speech perception. In general, improvement in masked speech intelligibility due to provision of spatial cues is called spatial release from masking. Here, we focused on an aspect of spatial release from masking, specifically, the role of spatial attention. We hypothesized that in a situation with IM background sound 1) attention to speech recruits lateral frontal cortex (LFCx), and 2) LFCx activity varies with direction of spatial attention. Using functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), we assessed LFCx activity bilaterally in normal-hearing listeners. In experiment 1, two talkers were simultaneously presented. Listeners either attended to the target talker (speech task) or they listened passively to an unintelligible, scrambled version of the acoustic mixture (control task). Target and masker differed in pitch and interaural time difference (ITD). Relative to the passive control, LFCx activity increased during attentive listening. Experiment 2 measured how LFCx activity varied with ITD, by testing listeners on the speech task in experiment 1, except that talkers either were spatially separated by ITD or co-located. Results show that directing of auditory attention activates LFCx bilaterally. Moreover, right LFCx is recruited more strongly in the spatially separated as compared with co-located configurations. Findings hint that LFCx function contributes to spatial release from masking in situations with IM.

neuroscience