Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hutchison, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Hutchison, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli population structure and antimicrobial susceptibility in Norfolk, UK

SynopsisO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSHalf of all women have experienced a urinary tract infection (UTI) in their lifetime and this remains a persistent issue in rural counties like Norfolk, UK. In alignment globally, Uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) are the main etiological agent for UTIs in Norfolk and are increasingly difficult to treat due to multi-drug resistance (MDR). ObjectiveWe set out to identify which clonal groups and resistance genes are disseminating in the community and hospitals in Norfolk, the first study of its kind for UPEC in this region. MethodsWe collected 217 clinical E. coli isolates causing UTIs in the community and hospital from the Clinical Microbiology laboratory at Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital. These were whole genome sequenced using the Illumina and MinION platforms for in silico multi-locus sequence typing and antibiotic resistance determinant detection. ResultsThe isolates were composed of 74 sequence types (STs); 8 lineages represented 57% of this population: ST73, ST12, ST69, ST131, ST404, ST95, ST127, and ST1193. Importantly, primary UTI screening deemed 8% of isolates to be MDR, with high rates of resistance to ampicillin (52.1%) and trimethoprim (36.2%) in hospitals. Of concern is the probable clonal expansion of MDR groups ST131 and ST1193 in hospitals and community settings with chromosomally encoded blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1, and aac(6)-Ib-cr5. ConclusionsThe burden of reported UTIs in Norfolk is largely caused by non-MDR isolates. The UPEC population is continually evolving, and monitoring samples with consideration of sources will help reduce burden of disease.

microbiology↗

Clinical diagnosis of TIA or stroke and prognosis in patients with neurological symptoms: a rapid access clinic cohort

BackgroundThe long-term risk of stroke or MI in patients with minor neurological symptoms who are not clinically diagnosed with transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke is uncertain.\n\nMethodsWe used data from a rapid access clinic for patients with suspected TIA or minor stroke and follow-up from four overlapping data sources for a diagnosis of ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction, major haemorrhage and death. We identified patients with and without a clinical diagnosis of TIA or minor stroke. We estimated hazard ratios of stroke, MI and death in early and late time periods.\n\nResults5,997 patients were seen from 2004-2013, who were diagnosed TIA or minor stroke (n=3604, 60%) or with other diagnoses (n=2392, 40%). By 5 years the proportion of patients who had a subsequent ischaemic stroke or MI, in patients with a clinical diagnosis of minor stroke or TIA was 19% [95% confidence interval (CI): 17-20%], and in patients with other diagnoses was 10% (95%CI: 8-15%). Patients with clinical diagnosis of TIA or minor stroke had three times the hazard of stroke or MI compared to patients with other diagnoses (HR 2.83 95%CI:2.13-3.76, adjusted age and sex) by 90 days post-event; however from 90 days to end of follow up, this difference was attenuated (HR 1.52, 95%CI:1.25-1.86). Older patients and those who had a history of vascular disease had a high risk of stroke or MI, whether or not they were diagnosed with minor stroke or TIA.\n\nConclusionsCareful attention to vascular risk factors in patients presenting with transient or minor neurological symptoms not thought to be due to stroke or TIA is justified, particularly those who are older or have a history of vascular disease.

epidemiology↗