Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hurwood, D. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Hurwood, D. A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Lineage maintenance due to assortative mating but not ecological divergence in a sympatric sibling species pair

The combination of differential adaptation to ecological niches and the development of reproductive barriers are considered helpful for maintaining co-existing species. In the absence of one of these elements, species boundaries are expected to breakdown. The tephritid fruit fly species pair, Bactrocera tryoni and B. neohumeralis, have significant overlap in geographic range and host use, with time of day of male mating the only known difference in their mating systems. Using a combination of ecological (seasonal abundance, host use and habitat use) and genomic data, we tested the differing roles of competition and assortative mating on the maintenance of the species boundaries in this species pair. Genome-wide SNP analyses found strong genetic differentiation between the species with no evidence for hybridization in the field. Most outlier SNPs were restricted to narrow regions towards the centromeres and telomeres of chromosomes and high nucleotide diversity rates were observed throughout the chromosomes of both species. Enrichment of annotation terms indicated an overabundance of genes with the abnormal neuroanatomy term. Terms of interest associated with sleep and circadian rhythm, potentially important to the allochronic reproductive barrier, were non-enriched. Ecological data found limited evidence for ecological differentiation between the two species based on significant positive correlations between species numbers trapped at different times of the year, trapped in different habitats within a region, or when reared from fruit. Our study highlights the significance of assortative mating over ecological differentiation for sympatric maintenance of the B. tryoni/B. neohumeralis sibling pair.

evolutionary biology↗

Genomic, Functional and Structural Analyses Reveal Mechanisms of Evolutionary Innovation within the Sea Anemone 8 Toxin Family

ShK from Stichodactyla helianthus has established the therapeutic potential of sea anemone venom peptides, but many lineage-specific toxin families in actinarians remain uncharacterised. One such peptide family, sea anemone 8 (SA8), is present in all five sea anemone superfamilies. We explored the genomic arrangement and evolution of the SA8 gene family in Actinia tenebrosa and Telmatactis stephensoni, characterised the expression patterns of SA8 sequences, and examined the structure and function of SA8 from the venom of T. stephensoni. We identified ten SA8 genes in two clusters and six SA8 genes in five clusters for T. stephensoni and A. tenebrosa, respectively. Nine SA8 T. stephensoni genes were found in a single cluster and an SA8 peptide encoded by an inverted SA8 gene from this cluster was recruited to venom. We show that SA8 genes in both species are expressed in a tissue-specific manner and the inverted SA8 gene has a unique tissue distribution. While functional activity of the SA8 putative toxin encoded by the inverted gene was inconclusive, its tissue localisation is similar to toxins used for predator deterrence. We demonstrate that, although mature SA8 putative toxins have similar cysteine spacing to ShK, SA8 peptides are distinct from ShK peptides based on structure and disulfide connectivity. Our results provide the first demonstration that SA8 is a unique gene family in actiniarians, evolving through a variety of structural changes including tandem and proximal gene duplication and an inversion event that together allowed SA8 to be recruited into the venom of T. stephensoni.

genetics↗

Divergent east-west lineages in an Australian fruit fly associated with the Carpentaria basin divide

Bactrocera jarvisi is an endemic Australian fruit fly species (Diptera: Tephritidae). It occurs commonly across tropical and subtropical coastal Australia, from far-northern Western Australia, across the Top End of the Northern Territory, and then down the Queensland east coast. Across this range, its distribution crosses several well documented biogeographic barriers. In order to better understand factors leading to the divergence of Australian fruit fly lineages, we carried out a population genetic study of B. jarvisi from across its range using genome-wide SNP analysis, utilising adult specimens gained from trapping and fruit rearing. Populations from the Northern Territory (NT) and Western Australia were genetically similar to each other, but divergent from the genetically uniform east-coast (=Queensland, QLD) population. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the NT population derived from the QLD population. We infer a role for the Carpentaria Basin as a biogeographic barrier restricting east-west gene flow. The QLD populations were largely panmictic and recognised east-coast biogeographic barriers play no part in north-south population structuring. While the NT and QLD populations were genetically distinct, there was evidence for the historically recent translocation of flies from each region to the other. Flies reared from different host fruits collected in the same location showed no genetic divergence. While a role for the Carpentaria Basin as a barrier to gene flow for Australian fruit flies agrees with existing work on the related B. tryoni, the reason(s) for population panmixia for B. jarvisi (and B. tryoni) over the entire Queensland east coast, a linear north-south distance of >2000km, remains unknown.

genetics↗