Biology subjects

Huot, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Huot, L..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

The transcriptional response in mosquitoes distinguishes between fungi and bacteria but not Gram types

Mosquitoes are prolific vectors of human pathogens; a clear and accurate understanding of the organization of their antimicrobial defenses is crucial for informing the development of transmission control strategies. The canonical infection response in insects, as described in the insect model Drosophila melanogaster, is pathogen type-dependent, with distinct stereotypical responses to Gram-negative bacteria and Gram-positive bacteria/fungi mediated by the activation of the Imd and Toll pathways, respectively. To determine whether this pathogen-specific discrimination is shared by mosquitoes, we used RNAseq to capture the genome-wide transcriptional response of Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) to systemic infection with Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, yeasts, and filamentous fungi, as well as challenge with heat-killed Gram-negative, Gram-positive, and fungal pathogens. From the resulting data, we found that Ae. aegypti and An. gambiae both mount a core response to all categories of infection, and this response is highly conserved between the two species with respect to both function and orthology. When we compared the transcriptomes of mosquitoes infected with different types of bacteria, we observed that the intensity of the transcriptional response was correlated with both the virulence and growth rate of the infecting pathogen. Exhaustive comparisons of the transcriptomes of Gram-negative-challenged versus Gram-positive-challenged mosquitoes yielded no difference in either species. In Ae. aegypti, however, we identified transcriptional signatures specific to bacterial infection and to fungal infection. The bacterial infection response was dominated by the expression of defensins and cecropins, while the fungal infection response included the disproportionate upregulation of an uncharacterized family of glycine-rich proteins. These signatures were also observed in Ae. aegypti challenged with heat-killed bacteria and fungi, indicating that this species can discriminate between molecular patterns that are specific to bacteria and to fungi.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2021

Primary brain cell infection by Toxoplasma gondii reveals the extent and dynamics of parasite differentiation and impact on neuron biology.

Toxoplasma gondii is a eukaryotic parasite that forms latent cysts in the brain of immunocompetent individuals. The latent parasite infection of the immune-privileged central nervous system is linked to most complications. With no drug currently available to eliminate the latent cysts in the brain of infected hosts, the consequences of neurons long-term infection are unknown. It has long been known that T. gondii specifically differentiates into a latent form (bradyzoite) in neurons, but how the infected neuron responds to the infection remains to be elucidated. We have established a new in vitro model resulting in the production of mature bradyzoite cysts in brain cells. Using dual, host and parasite RNA-seq, we characterized the dynamics of differentiation of the parasite, revealing the involvement of key pathways in this process. Moreover, we identified how the infected brain cells responded to the parasite infection revealing the drastic changes that take place. We showed that neuronal-specific pathways are strongly affected, with synapse signaling being particularly affected, especially glutamatergic synapse signaling. The establishment of this new in vitro model allows investigating both the dynamics of parasite differentiation and the specific response of neurons to the long-term infection by this parasite.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2020

A single master regulator controls asexual cell cycle division patterns in Toxoplasma gondii

All apicomplexan parasites have complex life cycles exhibiting division characterized by a tightly regulated cell cycle control, resulting in the emergence of daughter parasites in possession of a single nucleus and a complete set of organelles. Apicomplexa have evolved efficient and distinctive strategies for intracellular replication where the timing of emergence of the daughter cells, a process termed "budding", is a decisive element. However, the molecular mechanisms that provide the proper timing of parasite budding remain unknown. Using Toxoplasma gondii as a model Apicomplexa, we identified a master regulator that controls the timing of the budding process. We show that an ApiAP2 transcription factor, TgAP2IX-5, controls cell cycle events downstream of centrosome duplication including organelle division and segregation. TgAP2IX-5 binds to the promoter of hundreds of genes and controls the activation of the budding-specific cell cycle expression program. We show that TgAP2IX-5 regulates the expression of specific transcription factors that are necessary for the completion of the budding cycle. TgAP2IX-5 acts as a licensing factor that ensures that asexual proliferation continues by promoting the inhibition of the differentiation pathway at each round of the cell cycle. Therefore, TgAP2IX-5 is a master regulator that controls both cell cycle and developmental pathways.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2019

Partner-specific induction of Spodoptera frugiperda immune genes in response to the entomopathogenic nematobacterial complex Steinernema carpocapsae-Xenorhabdus nematophila

The Steinernema carpocapsae-Xenorhabdus nematophila association is a nematobacterial complex (NBC) used in biological control of insect crop pests. The ability of this dual pathogen to infest and kill an insect strongly depends on the dialogue between the hosts immune system and each partner of the complex. Even though this dialogue has been extensively studied from the two partners points of view in several insect models, still little is known about the structure and the molecular aspects of the insects immune response to the dual infection. Here, we used the lepidopteran pest Spodoptera frugiperda as a model to analyze the respective impact of each NBC partner in the spatiotemporal immune responses that are induced after infestation. To this aim, we first analyzed the expression variations of the insects immune genes in the fat bodies and hemocytes of infested larvae by using previously obtained RNAseq data. We then selected representative immune genes for RT-qPCR investigations of the temporal variations of their expressions after infestation and of their induction levels after independent injections of each partner. We found that the fat body and the hemocytes both produce potent and stable immune responses to the infestation by the NBC, which correspond to combinations of bacterium- and nematode-induced ones. Consistent with the nature of each pathogen, we showed that X. nematophila mainly induces genes classically involved in antibacterial responses, whereas S. carpocapsae is responsible for the induction of lectins and of genes expected to be involved in melanization and cellular encapsulation. In addition, we found that two clusters of unknown genes dramatically induced by the NBC also present partner-specific induction profiles, which paves the way for their functional characterization. Finally, we discuss putative relationships between the variations of the expression of some immune genes and the NBCs immunosuppressive strategies.\n\nAuthor summaryEntomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) are living in the soil and prey upon insect larvae. They enter the insect by the natural orifices, and reach the hemocoel through the intestinal epithelium. There, they release their symbiotic bacteria that will develop within the insect and eventually kill it. Nematodes can then feed and reproduce on the insect cadaver. By using transcriptomic approaches, we previously showed that Lepidoptera larvae (caterpillars of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda) produce a strong immune response in reaction to infestation by EPNs. However, we do not know if this immune reaction is triggered by the nematode itself -Steinernema carpacapsae - or its symbiotic bacteria - Xenorhabdus nematophila. To answer this question, we present in this work a careful annotation of immunity genes in S. frugiperda and surveyed their activation by quantitative PCR in reaction to an injection of the bacteria alone, the axenic nematode or the associated complex. We found that the immune genes are selectively activated by either the bacteria or the nematode and we discuss the implication of which pathway are involved in the defense against various pathogens. We also show that a cluster of newly discovered genes, present only in Lepidoptera, is activated by the nematode only and could represent nematicide genes.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2019

Spodoptera frugiperda transcriptional response to infestation by Steinernema carpocapsae

Steinernema carpocapsae is an entomopathogenic nematode (EPN) used in biological control of agricultural pest insects. It enters the hemocoel of its host via the intestinal tract and releases its symbiotic bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila, which kills the insect in less than 48 hours. Although several aspects of its interactions with insects have been extensively studied, still little is known about the immune and physiological responses of its different hosts. In order to improve this knowledge, we examined the transcriptional responses to EPN infestation of the fat body, the hemocytes and the midgut in the lepidopteran pest model Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).\n\nOur results indicate that the tissues poorly respond to the infestation at an early time post-infestation of 8 h, even though the proliferation of the bacterial symbiont within the hemocoel is detected. Only 5 genes are differentially expressed in the fat body of the caterpillars. However, strong transcriptional responses are observed at a later time point of 15 h post-infestation in all three tissues. While few genes are differentially expressed in the midgut, tissue-specific panels of induced metalloprotease inhibitors, immune receptors and antimicrobial peptides together with several uncharacterized genes are up-regulated in the fat body and the hemocytes. In addition, among the most up-regulated genes, we identified new potential immune effectors, unique to Lepidoptera, for which we present evidence of acquisition by Horizontal Gene Transfer from bacteria.\n\nAltogether, these results pave the way for further functional studies of the mobilized genes involvement in the interaction with the EPN.\n\nAuthor summaryThe Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, is a major agricultural pest. The caterpillars cause extensive damage to crops of importance such as corn, rice, sorghum and cotton. Originally from the Americas, it is currently becoming invasive in other parts of the world, first in Africa in 2016, then in India and now in south-east Asia. Programs of biological control against insect pests are increasingly encouraged around the world and include the use of pathogens. Entomopathogenic nematodes such as Steinernema carpocapsae are already commercialized as organic pesticides. These nematodes live in the soil and enter the body of their insect preys. Once within the insects, they release their symbiotic bacteria (Xenorhabdus nematophila in this case), which infect and kill the host in a few hours. The nematodes can then feed on the dead insects, reproduce and resume their life cycle. It is a major challenge to understand how EPN achieve their pathogenicity as well as how the insects can resist them. Here we provide the foundation for such an interaction between EPN and a Lepidoptera. We analyzed the dynamic of transcriptional response in three insect tissues (midgut, fat body and hemocytes) upon infestation by EPN. Not many studies have been performed genome-wide on such an interaction, and none on a Lepidopteran model of economical importance. Our transcriptomic approach revealed some specificities of the Lepidopteran defense mechanisms. In particular, we discovered a set of genes, acquired in Lepidoptera from bacteria by Horizontal Gene Transfer, that probably encode proteins with antibiotic activity.

genomics↗