Biology subjects

Hung, C.-T.

Publications and source records attributed to Hung, C.-T..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Paramyxovirus matrix proteins modulate host cell translation via exon-junction complex interactions in the cytoplasm

Viruses have evolved myriad strategies to exploit the translation machinery of host cells to potentiate their replication. However, how paramyxovirus (PMVs) modulate cellular translation for their own benefit has not been systematically examined. Utilizing puromycylation labeling, overexpression of individual viral genes, and infection with wild-type virus versus its gene-deleted counterpart, we found that PMVs significantly inhibit host cells nascent peptide synthesis during infection, with the viral matrix being the primary contributor to this effect. Using the rNiV-NPL replicon system, we discovered that the viral matrix enhances viral protein translation without affecting viral mRNA transcription and suppresses host protein expression at the translational level. Polysome profile analysis revealed that the HPIV3 matrix promotes the association of viral mRNAs with ribosomes, thereby enhancing their translation efficiency during infection. Intriguingly, our NiV-Matrix interactome identified the core exon-junction complex (cEJC), critical for mRNA biogenesis, as a significant component that interacts with the paramyxoviral matrix predominantly in the cytoplasm. siRNA knockdown of eIF4AIII simulated the restriction of cellular functions by the viral matrix, leading to enhanced viral gene translation and a reduction in host protein synthesis. Moreover, siRNA depletion of cEJC resulted in a 2-3 log enhancement in infectious virus titer for various PMVs but not SARS-CoV-2, enterovirus D68, or influenza virus. Our findings characterize a host translational interference mechanism mediated by viral matrix and host cEJC interactions. We propose that the PMV matrix redirects ribosomes to translate viral mRNAs at the expense of host cell transcripts, enhancing viral replication, and thereby enhancing viral replication. These insights provide a deeper understanding of the molecular interactions between paramyxoviruses and host cells, highlighting potential targets for antiviral strategies.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2024

SARS-CoV-2 Nsp15 antagonizes the cGAS-STING-mediated antiviral innate immune responses

Coronavirus (CoV) Nsp15 is a viral endoribonuclease (EndoU) with a preference for uridine residues. CoV Nsp15 is an innate immune antagonist which prevents dsRNA sensor recognition and stress granule formation by targeting viral and host RNAs. SARS-CoV-2 restricts and delays the host antiviral innate immune responses through multiple viral proteins, but the role of SARS-CoV-2 Nsp15 in innate immune evasion is not completely understood. Here, we generate an EndoU activity knockout rSARS-CoV-2Nsp15-H234A to elucidate the biological functions of Nsp15. Relative to wild-type rSARS-CoV-2, replication of rSARS-CoV-2Nsp15-H234A was significantly decreased in IFN-responsive A549-ACE2 cells but not in its STAT1 knockout counterpart. Transcriptomic analysis revealed upregulation of innate immune response genes in cells infected with rSARS-CoV-2Nsp15-H234A relative to wild-type virus, including cGAS-STING, cytosolic DNA sensors activated by both DNA and RNA viruses. Treatment with STING inhibitors H-151 and SN-011 rescued the attenuated phenotype of rSARS-CoV-2Nsp15-H234A. SARS-CoV-2 Nsp15 inhibited cGAS-STING-mediated IFN-{beta} promoter and NF-{kappa}B reporter activity, as well as facilitated the replication of EV-D68 and NDV by diminishing cGAS and STING expression and downstream innate immune responses. Notably, the decline in cGAS and STING was also apparent during SARS-CoV-2 infection. The EndoU activity was essential for SARS-CoV-2 Nsp15-mediated cGAS and STING downregulation, but not all HCoV Nsp15 share the consistent substrate selectivity. In the hamster model, rSARS-CoV-2Nsp15-H234A replicated to lower titers in the nasal turbinates and lungs and induced higher innate immune responses. Collectively, our findings exhibit that SARS-CoV-2 Nsp15 serves as a host innate immune antagonist by targeting host cGAS and STING. Significance statementHost innate immune system serves as the primary defense against pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2. Co-evolving with the hosts, viruses develop multiple approaches to escape the host surveillance. SARS-CoV-2 silences and dysregulates innate immune responses, and the chaos of antiviral IFN responses highly correlates to COVID-19 disease severity. Nsp15 is a conventional innate immune antagonist across coronaviruses, but the biological impact about SARS-CoV-2 Nsp15 is still unclear. Here, we provide a novel insight that SARS-CoV-2 Nsp15 hampers the expression of innate immune regulator - cGAS and STING via its endoribonuclease activity, then further ameliorates virus replication.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2020

Antibiotic concentrations in the sinonasal secretions and tissue in CRS patients after oral therapy: a randomized trial

Background Despite the widespread prescription of antibiotics for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), the extent to which drug distribution to the sinonasal mucosa influences their efficacy remains largely undefined.Methods Thirty subjects undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for bilateral CRS were randomized to one of three groups: 1) doxycycline (100 mg daily for seven days) 2) roxithromycin (300 mg daily for seven days) and 3) control (no antibiotics given). Drug levels were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in sinonasal secretions, sinonasal tissues and serum at steady state. Nasal endoscopy (Modified Lund-Kennedy) and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) scores were recorded.Results Antibiotic concentrations in the nasal secretions were significantly lower compared to those in the serum and tissue (mean mucus/serum ratio at steady state = 0.16 and 0.37 for doxycycline and roxithromycin respectively; p<0.01). A short course of antibiotic intake did not correlate with any difference in clinical outcomes except where slightly higher GSRS scores were reported in the roxithromycin group (p=0.04).Conclusions Although the efficacy of doxycycline and roxithromycin in sinonasal mucus in vivo cannot be predicted solely from reported minimum inhibitory concentrations, given the added complication of bacterial biofilm antimicrobial tolerance, these results suggest that low mucosal penetration of antibiotics may be one of the factors contributing to the limited efficacy of these agents in the treatment of CRS.View Full Text

pharmacology and toxicology↗