Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Huizinga, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Huizinga, T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Using genetics to differentiate patients with similar symptoms: application to inflammatory arthritis in the rheumatology outpatient clinic

Slow developing complex diseases are a clinical diagnostic challenge. Since genetic information is increasingly available prior to a patients first visit to a clinic, it might improve diagnostic accuracy. We aimed to devise a method to convert genetic information into simple probabilities discriminating between multiple diagnoses in patients presenting with inflammatory arthritis.\n\nWe developed G-Prob, which calculates for each patient the genetic probability for each of multiple possible diseases. We tested this for inflammatory arthritis-causing diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, spondyloarthropathy, psoriatic arthritis and gout). After validating in simulated data, we tested G-Prob in biobank cohorts in which genetic data were linked to electronic medical records: - 1,200 patients identified by ICD-codes within the eMERGE database (n= 52,623);\n- 245 patients identified through ICD codes and review of medical records within the Partners Biobank (n=12,604);\n- 243 patients selected prospectively with final diagnoses by medical record review within the Partners Biobank (n=12,604).\nThe calibration of G-Prob with the disease status was high (with regression coefficients ranging from 0.90-1.08 (ideal would be 1.00) in all cohorts. G-Probs discriminative ability was high in all cohorts with pooled Area Under the Curve (AUC)=0.69 [95%CI 0.67-0.71], 0.81 [95%CI 0.76-0.84] and 0.84 [95%CI 0.81-0.86]. For all patients, at least one disease could be ruled out, and in 45% of patients a most likely diagnosis could be identified with an overall 64% positive predictive value. In 35% of instances the clinicians initial diagnosis was incorrect. Initial clinical diagnosis explained 39% of the variance in final disease prediction which improved to 51% (P<0.0001) by adding G-Prob genetic data.\n\nIn conclusion, by converting genotypes into an interpretable probability value for five different inflammatory arthritides, we can better discriminate and diagnose rheumatic diseases. Genotypes available prior to a clinical visit could be considered part of patients medical history and potentially used to improve precision and diagnostic efficiency in clinical practice.

genetics↗

Fine-mapping identifies causal variants for RA and T1D in DNASE1L3, SIRPG, MEG3, TNFAIP3 and CD28/CTLA4 loci

We fine-mapped 76 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and type 1 diabetes (T1D) loci outside of the MHC. After sequencing 799 1kb regulatory (H3K4me3) regions within these loci in 568 individuals, we observed accurate imputation for 89% of common variants. We fine-mapped1,2 these loci in RA (11,475 cases, 15,870 controls)3, T1D (9,334 cases and 11,111 controls) 4 and combined datasets. We reduced the number of potential causal variants to [&le;]5 in 8 RA and 11 T1D loci. We identified causal missense variants in five loci (DNASE1L3, SIRPG, PTPN22, SH2B3 and TYK2) and likely causal non-coding variants in six loci (MEG3, TNFAIP3, CD28/CTLA4, ANKRD55, IL2RA, REL/PUS10). Functional analysis confirmed allele specific binding and differential enhancer activity for three variants: the CD28/CTLA4 rs117701653 SNP, the TNFAIP3 rs35926684 indel, and the MEG3 rs34552516 indel. This study demonstrates the potential for dense genotyping and imputation to pinpoint missense and non-coding causal alleles.

genetics↗