Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Huh, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Huh, C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Elucidating enzyme-substrate specificity through co-folding foundation model

Enzymatic catalysis relies on precise structural and chemical complementarity, yet systematically mapping enzyme-substrate interactions remains a critical bottleneck. While structure-aware methods have advanced functional annotation, their reliance on predefined binding pockets and rigid-body docking fails to capture the ligand-induced conformational changes essential for catalytic turnover. Here we introduce Boltz2ESI, an end-to-end framework that predicts enzyme-substrate interactions by leveraging structural knowledge learned by a biomolecular foundation model. Through native co-folding, the framework inherently captures active-site plasticity without requiring predefined pocket annotations. Integrating these learned biophysical priors with global evolutionary context and geometric molecular descriptors, Boltz2ESI consistently outperforms state-of-the-art sequence-based and rigid-docking approaches. Extensive validation demonstrates that the framework accurately discriminates tight sub-family specificities, enabling effective candidate prioritization for biosynthetic pathway elucidation, as demonstrated on the withanolide pathway. Ultimately, this structure-dynamic approach establishes an actionable foundation for accelerating rational biocatalyst discovery and large-scale pathway de-orphaning.

bioinformatics↗

Development of an Exploratory Taxonomy for Veterinary Professionals' AI Query Patterns Across Clinical Stages: An Expert Panel Study

Background/ObjectivesThe integration of large language model (LLM)-based AI tools into veterinary clinical practice is rapidly increasing; however, no systematically derived taxonomy of veterinary AI query patterns has been established. This study aimed to develop and refine an exploratory taxonomy of veterinary AI query patterns across clinical stages through a structured expert-panel review process. MethodsAn exploratory cross-sectional expert panel study was conducted. 5,372 real-world query logs from a veterinary clinical AI chatbot deployed over eight months were analyzed using AI-assisted inductive coding to derive an initial taxonomy. The taxonomy was refined through literature review and subsequently reviewed by an expert panel of 38 veterinary professionals via structured online survey across five clinical stages. ResultsA taxonomy of 3 categories and 21 subtypes was established: Clinical Support Queries (Types A-H), Evidence-Based Research Queries (Types I-L), and Terminology and Drug Reference Queries (Types M-U). Type B (Differential Reasoning) had the highest overall frequency (57/188 first-choice responses), while Type D (Clinical Decision Support) was dominant immediately post-consultation (55.3%). Veterinary professionals with [&ge;]10 years of experience showed a higher frequency of Type G (Evidence Search) preference than those with <10 years of experience (18 vs. 4), while university-affiliated professionals demonstrated a distinct pattern dominated by Type G. ConclusionsTo our knowledge, no published study has previously established a veterinary-specific, clinical-stage-sensitive exploratory taxonomy of AI query patterns; this study addresses that gap. The findings provide a foundational framework for designing context-aware, stage-adaptive veterinary AI systems and benchmark evaluation tools.

scientific communication and education↗