Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Houck, J. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Houck, J. M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Spatiotemporal Decoding of Explore-Exploit Decisions in the Human Brain

Adaptive behavior requires flexibly shifting between exploiting familiar rewards and exploring novel opportunities. These explore-exploit decisions are implemented via a distributed brain network--anchored in frontopolar cortex (FPC) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)--that computes the total value of a given choice by weighting the immediate value of familiar options against the latent future value of exploration. Capturing the precise temporal dynamics of these neural computations across spatially distributed cortical networks is critical to resolving how the brain manages this tradeoff. Here, we combined magnetoencephalography (MEG) with partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) modeling during a reinforcement learning task. By decoding POMDP-derived choice policies in MEG source space, we mapped the precise spatiotemporal emergence of explore-exploit decisions across the cortex. We demonstrate that explore-exploit policy implementation unfolds via a hierarchical functional dissociation across the rostral prefrontal cortex. During decision formation, the lateral FPC initiates the strategic shift toward exploration hundreds of milliseconds before choice execution. Conversely, vmPFC and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) do not exhibit early significant divergence from the baseline exploitative trace on exploration trials, displaying only a delayed, transient peak prior to choice execution. Following feedback, the vmPFC and OFC transition to a sustained representation of the choices empirical value to update reward expectancies and guide future actions. Mapping reinforcement learning variables onto millisecond-resolved neural data reveals how the human brain resolves the explore-exploit dilemma: through early strategic initiation of exploration in the FPC, a delayed exploratory shift in vmPFC and OFC, and sustained outcome evaluation to optimize future actions.

neuroscience↗

A comparison of automated and manual co-registration for magnetoencephalography

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neuroimaging technique that accurately captures the rapid (sub-millisecond) activity of neuronal populations. Interpretation of functional data from MEG relies upon registration to the participants anatomical MRI. The key remaining step is to transform the participants MRI into the MEG head coordinate space. Although both automated and manual approaches to co-registration are available, the relative accuracy of two approaches has not been systematically evaluated. The goal of the present study was to compare the accuracy of manual and automated co-registration. Resting MEG and T1-weighted MRI data were collected from 90 participants. Automated and manual co-registration were performed on the same subjects, and the inter-method reliability of the two methods assessed using the intra-class correlation. Median co-registration error for both methods was within acceptable limits. Inter-method reliability was in the "good" range for co-registration error, and the "good" to "excellent" range for translation and rotation. These results suggest that the output of the automated co-registration procedure is comparable to that achieved using manual co-registration.

neuroscience↗

Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity In Schizophrenia With MEG And fMRI, Do Different Time Scales Tell A Different Story?

The importance of how brain networks function together to create brain states has become increasingly recognized. Therefore, an investigation of eyes-open resting state dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) of healthy controls (HC) versus that of schizophrenia patients (SP) via both fMRI and a novel MEG pipeline was completed. The fMRI analysis used a spatial independent component analysis (ICA) to determine the networks on which the dFNC was based. The MEG analysis utilized a source-space activity estimate (MNE/dSPM) whose result was the input to a spatial ICA, on which the networks of the MEG dFNC was based. We found that dFNC measures reveal significant differences between HC and SP, which depended upon the imaging modality. Consistent with previous findings, a dFNC analysis predicated on fMRI data revealed HC and SP remain in different overall brain states (defined by a k-means clustering of network correlations) for significantly different periods of time, with SP spending less time in a highly-connected state. The MEG dFNC, in contrast, revealed group differences in more global statistics: SP changed between meta-states (k-means cluster states that are allowed to overlap in time) significantly more often and to states which were more different, relative to HC. MEG dFNC also revealed a highly connected state where a significant difference was observed in inter-individual variability, with greater variability among SP. Overall, our results show that fMRI and MEG reveal between-group functional connectivity differences in distinct ways, highlighting the utility of using each of the modalities individually, or potentially a combination of modalities, to better inform our understanding of disorders such as schizophrenia.

neuroscience↗

Relationship between MEG global dynamic functional network connectivity measures and symptoms in schizophrenia

An investigation of differences in dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) of healthy controls (HC) versus that of schizophrenia patients (SP) was completed, using eyes-open resting state MEG data. The MEG analysis utilized a source-space activity estimate (MNE/dSPM) whose result was the input to a group spatial independent component analysis (ICA), on which the networks of our MEG dFNC analysis were based. We have previously reported that our MEG dFNC revealed that SP change between cognitive meta-states (repeating patterns of network correlations which are allowed to overlap in time) significantly more often and to states which are more different, relative to HC. Here, we extend our previous work to investigate the relationship between symptomology in SP and four meta-state metrics. We found a significant correlation between positive symptoms and the two meta-state statistics which showed significant differences between HC and SP. These two statistics quantified 1) how often individuals change state and 2) the total distance traveled within the state-space. We additionally found that a clustering of the meta-state metrics divides SP into groups which vary in symptomology. These results indicate specific relationships between symptomology and brain function for SP.

neuroscience↗