Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hosner, P. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Hosner, P. A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Reconciling GenBank names with standardized avian taxonomies to improve linkage between phylogeny and phenotype

Biodiversity research has advanced by testing expectations of ecological and evolutionary hypotheses through the linking of large-scale genetic, distributional, and trait datasets. The rise of molecular systematics over the past 30 years has resulted in a wealth of DNA sequence data from around the globe, facilitating biodiversity research. However, advances in molecular systematics also have created taxonomic instability, as new estimates of evolutionary relationships and interpretations of species limits have led to widespread scientific name changes. Taxonomic instability, or "splits, lumps, and shuffles", present logistical challenges to large-scale biodiversity research because species or populations may be listed under different names in different data sources, or because different species or populations may be listed under previous names. Consequently, distributional and trait data are often difficult to link directly to DNA sequence data without extensive and time consuming curation. Here, we present RANT: Reconciliation of Avian NCBI Taxonomy. RANT applies taxonomic reconciliation to standardize all avian names in use in NCBI GenBank, a primary source of genetic data, to a widely-used and regularly-updated avian taxonomy: eBird/Clements. Of 14,341 avian species or subspecies names used by GenBank, 11,031 names directly matched an eBird/Clements name, which were linked to over 6 million nucleotide sequences. For the remaining unique avian names in GenBank, we used Avibases taxonomic concepts, taxonomic descriptions in Cornells Birds of the World, and DNA sequence metadata to identify corresponding eBird/Clements names. Reconciled names were linked to over 600,000 nucleotide sequences, approximately 9% of all avian sequences on GenBank. Nearly 10% of eBird/Clements names had nucleotide sequences listed under two or more GenBank names. Our avian GenBank naming reconciliation is open source and available at GitHub, where it can be updated to correspond with future annual eBird/Clements taxonomic updates. LAY SUMMARY- 23% of avian names on GenBank do not match eBird/Clements, a widely-used standardized avian taxonomy - 600,000 nucleotide sequences on GenBank are associated with names that do not match eBird/Clements - 10% of eBird/Clements names have nucleotide sequences listed under multiple GenBank names - We provide an open source taxonomic reconciliation to mitigate difficulties associated with non-standardized name use for GenBank data

zoology↗

Historical specimens and the limits of subspecies phylogenomics in the New World quails (Odontophoridae)

As phylogenomics focuses on comprehensive taxon sampling at the species and population/subspecies levels, incorporating genomic data from historical specimens has become increasingly common. While historical samples can fill critical gaps in our understanding of the evolutionary history of diverse groups, they also introduce additional sources of phylogenomic uncertainty, making it difficult to discern novel evolutionary relationships from artifacts caused by sample quality issues. These problems highlight the need for improved strategies to disentangle artifactual patterns from true biological signal as historical specimens become more prevalent in phylogenomic datasets. Here, we tested the limits of historical specimen-driven phylogenomics to resolve subspecies-level relationships within a highly polytypic family, the New World quails (Odontophoridae), using thousands of ultraconserved elements (UCEs). We found that relationships at and above the species-level were well-resolved and highly supported across all analyses, with the exception of discordant relationships within the two most polytypic genera which included many historical specimens. We examined the causes of discordance and found that inferring phylogenies from subsets of taxa resolved the disagreements, suggesting that analyzing subclades can help remove artifactual causes of discordance in datasets that include historical samples. At the subspecies-level, we found well-resolved geographic structure within the two most polytypic genera, including the most polytypic species in this family, Northern Bobwhites (Colinus virginianus), demonstrating that variable sites within UCEs are capable of resolving phylogenetic structure below the species level. Our results highlight the importance of complete taxonomic sampling for resolving relationships among polytypic species, often through the inclusion of historical specimens, and we propose an integrative strategy for understanding and addressing the uncertainty that historical samples sometimes introduce to phylogenetic analyses.

evolutionary biology↗