Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hormiga, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Hormiga, G..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

No silver bullet: Patterns of macrosynteny recapitulate systemic conflicts in the higher-level relationships of the arachnids

Rare genomic changes have long been sought by phylogeneticists for their potential to resolve obdurate nodes in the tree of life. Recently, patterns of macrosynteny have been proffered as a breakthrough for challenging relationships within invertebrates. One taxon that stands to benefit from the application of this approach is Chelicerata (the sister group to the rest of Arthropoda), whose radiation has long defied resolution, despite intensive investigations using morphological characters, molecular sequence data, and a combination thereof. Challenges to the resolution of chelicerate phylogeny include an ancient rapid radiation, the incidence of several fast-evolving lineages prone to long-branch attraction artifacts, and extinction of multiple ordinal level lineages that cannot be sampled for breaking long branches. At present, only a subset of nodes has been stably resolved. To break this impasse, we brought to bear multiple classes of phylogenetically informative rare genomic changes, including the sequencing of the first genomes for Ricinulei and Palpigradi. Here, we show that an ancient, shared whole genome duplication event is restricted to Arachnopulmonata (the most recent common ancestor of spiders and scorpions), disfavoring traditional placements of either Ricinulei or Palpigradi as close relatives of tetrapulmonates. Intriguingly, investigation of fusion-with-mixing events identified equal support for mutually exclusive placements for Acariformes, the least stable of the arachnid orders. Our results suggest that fusion-with-mixing, far from being a silver bullet, likely exhibits the same emergent property as all character systems, in that it is prone to homoplasy and conflicting signal stemming from ancient rapid radiations.

evolutionary biology↗

Comprehensive species sampling and sophisticated algorithmic approaches refute the monophyly of Arachnida

Deciphering the evolutionary relationships of Chelicerata (arachnids, horseshoe crabs, and allied taxa) has proven notoriously difficult, due to their ancient rapid radiation and the incidence of elevated evolutionary rates in several lineages. While conflicting hypotheses prevail in morphological and molecular datasets alike, the monophyly of Arachnida is nearly universally accepted. Though a small number of phylotranscriptomic analyses have recovered arachnid monophyly, these did not sample all living chelicerate orders. We generated a dataset of 506 high-quality genomes and transcriptomes, sampling all living orders of Chelicerata with high occupancy and rigorous approaches to orthology inference. Our analyses consistently recovered the nested placement of horseshoe crabs within a paraphyletic Arachnida. This result was insensitive to variation in evolutionary rates of genes, complexity of the substitution models, and alternatives algorithmic approaches to species tree inference. Investigation of systematic bias showed that genes and sites that recover arachnid monophyly are enriched in noise and exhibit low information content. To test the effect of morphological data, we generated a 514-taxon morphological data matrix of extant and fossil Chelicerata, analyzed in tandem with the molecular matrix. Combined analyses recovered the clade Merostomata (the marine orders Xiphosura, Eurypterida, and Chasmataspidida), but nested within Arachnida. Our results suggest that morphological convergence resulting from adaptations to life in terrestrial habitats has driven the historical perception of arachnid monophyly, paralleling the history of numerous other invertebrate terrestrial groups.

evolutionary biology↗