Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hood, F. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Hood, F. E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Proteomics- and BRET-screens identify SPRY2 as Ras effector that impacts its membrane organisation

K-Ras functions within nanoscale proteo-lipid domains of the plasma membrane, but few regulators of its membrane organisation are known. We combined TurboID-based proximity proteomics with a secondary BRET screen to identify eight novel K-Ras G-domain interactors. We focused on APLP2 and SPRY2 for further characterisation. APLP2 binds K-Ras indirectly via C-Raf, while SPRY2 exhibits properties of a novel effector. Co-immunoprecipitation and BRET assays revealed that the SPRY2 C-terminal fragment (residues 161-315) binds oncogenic RasG12V more strongly than the full-length protein. Both forms localise to the plasma membrane, but this localisation and binding to K-Ras is disrupted by inhibitors of K-Ras membrane anchorage or activity. Mutations at the predicted interface of K-Ras and SPRY2s C-terminal region affect the interaction. Both full-length SPRY2 and its C-terminal fragment promote differentiation of C2C12 muscle cells, a process requiring MAPK pathway inhibition. Finally, SPRY2 also forms homo- or hetero-oligomers with SPRY4. We propose that active K-Ras recruits SPRY2 dimers to the membrane, where they bind Ras and block effector access.

biochemistry↗

Ras protein abundance correlates with Ras isoform mutation patterns in cancer.

Activating mutations of Ras genes are often observed in cancer. The protein products of the three Ras genes are almost identical. However, for reasons that remain unclear, KRAS is far more frequently mutated than the other Ras isoforms in cancer and RASopathies. We have quantified HRAS, NRAS, KRAS4A and KRAS4B protein abundance across a large panel of cell lines and healthy tissues. We observe consistent patterns of KRAS>NRAS>>HRAS protein expression in cells that correlate with the rank order of Ras mutation frequencies in cancer. Our data provide support for the model of a sweet-spot of Ras dosage mediating isoform-specific contributions to cancer and development. However, they challenge the notion that rare codons mechanistically underpin the predominance of KRAS mutant cancers. Finally, direct measurement of mutant versus wildtype KRAS protein abundance revealed a frequent imbalance that may suggest additional non-gene duplication mechanisms for optimizing oncogenic Ras dosage.

cancer biology↗