Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Honar, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Honar, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Emotional Modulation of Face Working Memory Precision in Specific Learning Disorders: Valence Flattening and Mnemonic Distortions

This study examined whether emotional valence modulates face working memory precision in adolescents with specific learning disorders (SLD) and whether mnemonic distortions differ across subtypes. Fifty-four adolescents with SLD (dyslexia: n = 19; dysgraphia: n = 18; dyscalculia: n = 17) and 42 typically developing peers completed a morphed delayed reproduction task using sad, neutral, and happy faces. Using a von Mises + uniform mixture model, we decomposed recall errors into precision, systematic bias, and guessing. The SLD group made significantly larger errors (r = 8722;0.61) and responded more slowly (r = -0.33). Mixture modeling showed that deficits arose from reduced precision ({kappa}: TD M = 8.72 vs. SLD M = 4.15; r = 0.54) and stronger systematic bias toward neutrality (: TD M = -0.66 vs. SLD M = -4.15; r = 0.34), with no differences in random guessing. Valence flattening was consistently larger in SLD. Among subtypes, dyscalculia showed the greatest working memory impairment, yet all three exhibited the same valence flattening pattern. Thus, emotional faces disrupt face working memory in SLD through reduced precision and systematic affective distortion. The bias parameter from mixture modeling may offer a clinically useful metric for subtype-sensitive assessment.

neuroscience↗

The Gut-Brain Axis Shapes Cognitive-Emotional Processing: Evidence for Attentional Avoidance of Bloating Cues in IBS

BackgroundIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by significant gut-brain interactions and various symptoms such as abdominal pain, bloating, and altered bowel habits. Cognitive deficits in IBS have been linked to attentional biases, particularly towards somatic and symptom-related cues. Despite increasing interest in understanding these cognitive processes, the specific patterns of attentional biases and their relationship with anxiety in IBS remain inadequately explored. MethodThis study employed a dot-probe task to compare attentional biases toward somatic (bloating, pain) and social threat cues (angry/disgusted faces) in 15 patients with IBS, 15 individuals with high anxiety (HA), and 15 healthy controls (HC). Participants completed two tasks (Body/Face) with 500 ms stimulus exposure. Attentional bias indices (RT incongruent - RT congruent) were analyzed using mixed-design ANOVAs, controlling for anxiety (STAI) and IBS symptom severity (IBS-SSS). ResultsPatients with IBS exhibited significant avoidance of bloating-related stimuli compared to HC (p =.013), but not pain-related cues. Anxiety modulated attentional processing in IBS (p =.015) and HC (p =.013). HA showed no significant biases. IBS patients demonstrated slower overall reaction times than HC (p=.024), suggesting cognitive load. A positive IBS severity-anxiety correlation was observed in IBS (r = 0.574, p =.020). ConclusionsThe findings demonstrate that IBS is associated with selective avoidance of bloating-related stimuli, driven by a maladaptive interplay between hyper-precise symptom expectations and interoceptive noise--a mechanism distinct from anxiety-related attentional patterns. While anxiety amplifies this avoidance, it does not independently account for the cognitive profile of IBS. These results underscore the gut-brain axis role in shaping cognitive-emotional processing.

neuroscience↗