Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hollingsworth, N. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Hollingsworth, N. M..

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Two distinct modes of meiotic chromosome synapsis

The pairwise alignment of homologous chromosomes within the synaptonemal complex (SC) is important for meiotic crossover recombination and fertility. However, chromosomes do not need sequence homology to synapse, with meiotic recombination defects often leading to synapsis of non-homologous chromosome segments. Here we show that such heterologous synapsis reflects a distinctly regulated mode of meiotic chromosome synapsis that also happens during the early stages of wild-type yeast meiosis and occurs in parallel to the well-known synapsis initiation at crossover-designated sites. Heterologous synapsis initiates along chromosome arms after double-strand break resection and is accompanied by canonical markers of crossover repair, but does not need recombinase-dependent strand invasion. Instead, it requires the DNA-damage sensor kinase ATR/Mec1, which phosphorylates of a specific amino acid in Zip1, the major transverse filament protein of the SC. Phospho-mimetic mutants in ZIP1 rescue the synapsis defect of mec1 mutants and also partially restore gamete viability, indicating that this particular MEC1 function is important for the faithful completion of meiosis. Importantly, crossover repair quickly rectifies heterologous synapsis, allowing successful completion of meiosis even when most of the genome initially synapses independently of homology. Our data identify meiotic chromosome synapsis as a dynamic and reversible process that becomes optimized as result of recombination-dependent chromosome pairing.

genetics↗

PIF1, RAD54 and RDH54/TID1 promote residual double strand break repair during meiosis in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, repair of programmed double strand breaks occurs in two phases during prophase I of meiosis. During Phase 1 interhomolog recombination is mediated by the meiosis-specific Dmc1 recombinase. Crossover-specific recombination intermediates enable synapsis of homologous chromosomes, resulting in a transition to Rad51-mediated recombination in Phase 2 that repairs any residual double strand breaks so that chromosomes are intact when cells progress into the first meiotic division. Studying Phase 2 recombination is challenging because the number of breaks present at pachynema (the prophase I stage when all the homologs are synapsed) is small and a low frequency of new breaks continues to be made. Using a newly developed method for analyzing Phase 2 recombination, this work discovered that RDH54/TID1 can partially compensate for RAD54, while PIF1 functions independently from both RAD54 and RDH54/TID1 in this process. ARTICLE SUMMARYMeiotic recombination involves repair of numerous programmed double strand breaks (DSBs). Failure to repair all the DSBs results in inviable gametes. Meiotic DSB repair occurs in two phases. In Phase 1, recombination occurs between homologs to create crossovers needed for proper chromosome segregation. Subsequently, Phase 2 recombination repairs any remaining DSBs prior to cells progressing through Meiosis I. Using a novel method for studying Phase 2 recombination, this work shows that RDH54/TID1 can partially substitute for the related RAD54 translocase and that the conserved PIF1 helicase functions independently of both RDH54/TID1 and RAD54 in this process.

genetics↗

The conserved SEN1 DNA/RNA helicase has multiple functions during yeast meiosis

Diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells undergo meiosis when they are starved of nitrogen in the presence of a non-fermentable carbon source. Nutrient starvation triggers expression of Ime1, a master regulatory protein required to activate transcription of meiotic "early genes" that mediate premeiotic S phase and prophase I processes, including recombination and chromosome synapsis. During prophase I, the highly conserved, toposomerase-like protein, Spo11, creates double strand breaks that are used to identify homologous chromosomes and generate crossovers between them. DNA:RNA hybrids are formed when an RNA molecule anneals to a complementary strand of DNA and are present at the ends of double strand breaks during prophase I of meiosis in a variety of organisms. DNA:RNA hybrids can be removed by degradation of the RNA by RNase H or by unwinding of the RNA by an essential, multi-functional DNA:RNA helicase called Sen1. Sen1 is orthologous to the mammalian Senataxin (SETX) helicase. Phenotypic characterization of mouse mutants lacking either Senataxin or RNase H activity exhibit male infertility and defects in double strand break repair. SETX is also required for meiotic sex chromosome inactivation, making it unclear whether SETXs role in meiotic recombination is direct or an indirect consequence due to defects in SETX functions that affect transcription. Using a variety of orthogonal approaches, this work demonstrates that SEN1 has multiple, temporally distinct roles that promote yeast meiosis. First, it enables the timely expression of IME1-regulated early genes. Second, it helps prevent and/or remove DNA:RNA hybrids that form during premeiotic S phase. Third, it facilitates both repair of Spo11 generated double strand breaks generated during prophase I and chromosome synapsis. AUTHOR SUMMARYDNA:RNA hybrids are unusual structures found throughout the genomes of many species, including yeast and mammals. While DNA:RNA hybrids may promote various cellular functions, persistent hybrids lead to double strand breaks, resulting in genomic instability. DNA:RNA hybrid formation and removal are therefore highly regulated by enzymes that either degrade or unwind RNA from the hybrid. Meiosis is the specialized cell division that creates haploid gametes for sexual reproduction. Previous work in yeast and mammals showed that elimination of DNA:RNA hybrids by RNase H facilitates meiotic recombination. This work demonstrates that the conserved Sen1 DNA:RNA helicase regulates the presence of DNA:RNA hybrids in three temporally distinct processes during yeast meiosis. First, SEN1 allows for meiosis-specific genes to be expressed at the proper time to allow entry into meiosis. Second, SEN1 prevents the accumulation of hybrids during premeiotic DNA replication. Third, SEN1 promotes the repair of programmed meiotic double strand breaks that are necessary to form crossovers between homologous chromosomes to allow their proper segregation at the first meiotic division. Given the evolutionary conservation of Sen1 with its mammalian counterpart, Senataxin, studies of Sen1 function in yeast are likely to be informative about the regulation of DNA:RNA hybrids during humans as well.

genetics↗

An acidic loop in the FHA domain of the yeast meiosis-specific kinase Mek1 interacts with a specific motif in a subset of Mek1 substrates

The meiosis-specific kinase Mek1 regulates key steps in meiotic recombination in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. MEK1 limits resection at the double strand break (DSB) ends and is required for preferential strand invasion into homologs, a process known as interhomolog bias. After strand invasion, MEK1 promotes phosphorylation of the synaptonemal complex protein Zip1 that is necessary for DSB repair mediated by a crossover specific pathway that enables chromosome synapsis. In addition, Mek1 phosphorylation of the meiosis-specific transcription factor, Ndt80, regulates the meiotic recombination checkpoint that prevents exit from pachytene when DSBs are present. Mek1 interacts with Ndt80 through a five amino acid sequence, RPSKR, located between the DNA binding and activation domains of Ndt80. AlphaFold Multimer modeling of a fragment of Ndt80 containing the RPSKR motif and full length Mek1 indicated that RPSKR binds to an acidic loop located in the Mek1 FHA domain, a non-canonical interaction with this motif. A second protein, the 5-3 helicase Rrm3, similarly interacts with Mek1 through an RPAKR motif and is an in vitro substrate of Mek1. Genetic analysis using various mutants in the MEK1 acidic loop validated the AlphaFold model, in that they specifically disrupt two-hybrid interactions with Ndt80 and Rrm3. Phenotypic analyses further showed that the acidic loop mutants are defective in the meiotic recombination checkpoint, and in certain circumstances exhibit more severe phenotypes compared to the NDT80 mutant with the RPSKR sequence deleted, suggesting that additional, as yet unknown, substrates of Mek1 also bind to Mek1 using an RPXKR motif. ARTICLE SUMMARYThe FHA domain is conserved module best known for creating protein complexes by binding to phosphorylated threonines on target proteins. This work identified a non-canonical mechanism by which the FHA domain of the yeast meiosis-specific kinase Mek1 interacts with two of its substrates, Ndt80 and Rrm3. An acidic loop within the FHA domain binds to RPXKR motifs in Ndt80 and Rrm3. Genetic evidence suggests that this FHA domain acidic loop is required binding to additional Mek1 substrates.

genetics↗

Rad51-mediated interhomolog recombination during budding yeast meiosis is promoted by the meiotic recombination checkpoint and the conserved Pif1 helicase

During meiosis, recombination between homologous chromosomes (homologs) generates crossovers that promote proper segregation at the first meiotic division. Recombination is initiated by Spo11-catalyzed double strand breaks (DSBs). 5 end resection of the DSBs creates 3 single strand tails that two recombinases, Rad51 and Dmc1, bind to form presynaptic filaments that search for homology, mediate strand invasion and generate displacement loops (D-loops). D-loop processing then forms crossover and non-crossover recombinants. Meiotic recombination occurs in two temporally distinct phases. During Phase 1, Rad51 is inhibited and Dmc1 mediates the interhomolog recombination that promotes homolog synapsis. In Phase 2, Rad51 becomes active and functions with Rad54 to repair residual DSBs, making increasing use of sister chromatids. The transition from Phase 1 to Phase 2 is controlled by the meiotic recombination checkpoint through the meiosis-specific effector kinase Mek1. This work shows that constitutive activation of Rad51 in Phase 1 results in a subset of DSBs being repaired by a Rad51-mediated interhomolog recombination pathway that is distinct from that of Dmc1. Strand invasion intermediates generated by Rad51 require more time to be processed into recombinants, resulting in a meiotic recombination checkpoint delay in prophase I. Without the checkpoint, Rad51-generated intermediates are more likely to be repaired using a sister chromatid, thereby increasing Meiosis I chromosome nondisjunction. This Rad51 interhomolog recombination pathway is specifically promoted by the conserved 5-3 helicase PIF1 and its paralog, RRM3 and requires Pif1 helicase activity and its interaction with PCNA. This work demonstrates that (1) inhibition of Rad51 during Phase 1 is important to prevent competition with Dmc1 for DSB repair, (2) Rad51-mediated meiotic recombination intermediates are initially processed differently than those made by Dmc1, (3) the meiotic recombination checkpoint provides time during prophase 1 for processing of Rad51-generated recombination intermediates. AUTHOR SUMMARYTo sexually reproduce, cells containing two copies of each chromosome must undergo the specialized cell division of meiosis to sort the chromosomes into gametes containing a single copy of each chromosome. But how do homologous chromosomes know who is who? The answer is by recombination, a process in which double strand breaks on one chromosome are converted to single stranded ends that can search for the complementary sequence on the homolog. In yeast and mammals, this homology search involves binding of single strand ends by two highly conserved recombinases, Rad51 and the meiosis specific Dmc1. Rad51 is used in mitotic cells to repair breaks, primarily using sister chromatids as templates, while Dmc1 functions in meiosis to generate interhomolog crossovers. In budding yeast, Rad51 strand exchange activity is normally inhibited while Dmc1 is active. We show here that when Rad51 and Dmc1 are active at the same time, Rad51 competes with Dmc1 to mediate interhomolog recombination of a subset of double strand breaks. However, because Rad51- generated recombination intermediates take longer to process, there is a need to keep Rad51 inactive while interhomolog recombination is occurring.

genetics↗

Interaction between VPS13A and the XK scramblase is required to prevent VPS13A disease in humans

VPS13 family proteins form conduits between the membranes of different organelles through which lipids are transferred. In humans there are four VPS13 paralogs each of which is required to prevent a different inherited disorder. VPS13 proteins contain multiple conserved domains. The VAB domain binds to adaptor proteins to recruit VPS13 to specific membrane contact sites. This work demonstrates the importance of a different domain in VPS13A in preventing VPS13A disease (chorea-acanthocytosis). The Pleckstrin Homology (PH) domain at the C-terminus of VPS13A is required to form a complex with the XK scramblase and for proper localization of VPS13A within the cell. Mutations in the interaction surface between VPS13A and XK predicted by Alphafold modeling disrupt complex formation and colocalization of the two proteins. Mutant VPS13A alleles found in patients with VPS13A disease truncate the PH domain. The phenotypic similarities between VPS13A disease and McLeod syndrome caused by mutations in XK argue that loss of VPS13A-XK complex is the basis of both diseases. Summary StatementVPS13A disease and McLeod syndrome are related disorders caused by mutation of the VPS13A and XK genes, respectively. A pathologic VPS13A mutation disrupts binding of the VPS13A and XK proteins, suggesting a common basis of both diseases.

cell biology↗

Meiotic cell cycle progression requires adaptation to a constitutive DNA damage signal

Meiotic chromosome segregation relies on synapsis and crossover recombination between homologous chromosomes. These processes require multiple steps that are coordinated by the meiotic cell cycle and monitored by surveillance mechanisms. In diverse species, failures in chromosome synapsis can trigger a cell cycle delay and/or lead to apoptosis. How this key step in "homolog engagement" is sensed and transduced by meiotic cells is unknown. Here we report that in C. elegans, recruitment of the Polo-like kinase PLK-2 to the synaptonemal complex triggers phosphorylation and inactivation of CHK-2, an early meiotic kinase required for pairing, synapsis, and double-strand break induction. Inactivation of CHK-2 ends double-strand break formation and promotes crossover designation and cell cycle progression. These findings illuminate how meiotic cells ensure crossover formation and accurate chromosome segregation. SummaryAccurate chromosome segregation during meiosis requires crossovers between each pair of homologs. Zhang et al. show that meiotic progression in C. elegans involves inactivation of CHK-2 by PLK-2 in response to synapsis and formation of crossover precursors on all chromosomes.

cell biology↗

The crossover function of MutSγ is activated via Cdc7-dependent stabilization of Msh4

The MutS{gamma} complex, Msh4-Msh5, binds DNA joint-molecule (JM) intermediates during homologous recombination to promote crossing over and accurate chromosome segregation at the first division of meiosis. MutS{gamma} facilitates the formation and biased resolution of crossover-specific JM intermediates called double Holliday junctions. Here we show that these activities are governed by regulated proteasomal degradation. MutS{gamma} is initially inactive for crossing over due to an N-terminal degron on Msh4 that renders it unstable. Activation of MutS{gamma} requires the Dbf4-dependent kinase, Cdc7 (DDK), which directly phosphorylates and thereby neutralizes the Msh4 degron. Phosphorylated Msh4 is chromatin bound and requires DNA strand exchange and chromosome synapsis, implying that DDK specifically targets MutS{gamma} that has already bound nascent JMs. Our study establishes regulated protein degradation as a fundamental mechanism underlying meiotic crossover control.

genetics↗

Persistent DNA-break potential near telomeres increases initiation of meiotic recombination on small chromosomes

Faithful meiotic chromosome inheritance and fertility relies on the stimulation of meiotic crossover recombination by potentially genotoxic DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). To avoid excessive damage, feedback mechanisms down-regulate DSBs on chromosomes that have successfully initiated crossover repair. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, this regulation requires the removal of the conserved DSB-promoting protein Hop1/HORMAD during chromosome synapsis. Here, we identify privileged end-adjacent regions (EARs) spanning roughly 100 Kb near all telomeres that escape DSB downregulation. These regions retain Hop1 and continue to break in pachynema despite normal synaptonemal complex deposition. Differential retention of Hop1 requires the disassemblase Pch2/TRIP13, which preferentially removes Hop1 from telomere-distant sequences, and is modulated by the histone deacetylase Sir2 and the nucleoporin Nup2. Importantly, the uniform size of EARs among chromosomes contributes to disproportionately high DSB and repair signals on short chromosomes in pachynema, suggesting that EARs partially underlie the curiously high recombination rate of short chromosomes.

genomics↗

Histone H3 threonine 11 phosphorylation is catalyzed directly by the meiosis-specific kinase Mek1 and provides a molecular readout of Mek1 activity in vivo

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mek1 is a CHK2/Rad53-family kinase that regulates meiotic recombination and progression upon its activation in response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The full catalog of direct Mek1 phosphorylation targets remains unknown. Here, we show that phosphorylation of histone H3 on threonine 11 (H3 T11ph) is induced by meiotic DSBs in S. cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Molecular genetic experiments in S. cerevisiae confirmed that Mek1 is required for H3 T11ph and revealed that phosphorylation is rapidly reversed when Mek1 kinase is no longer active. Reconstituting histone phosphorylation in vitro with recombinant proteins demonstrated that Mek1 directly catalyzes H3 T11 phosphorylation. Mutating H3 T11 to nonphosphorylatable residues conferred no detectable defects in otherwise unperturbed meiosis, although the mutations modestly reduced spore viability in certain strains where Rad51 is used for strand exchange in place of Dmc1. H3 T11ph is therefore mostly dispensable for Mek1 function. However, H3 T11ph provides an excellent marker of ongoing Mek1 kinase activity in vivo. Anti-H3 T11ph chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing demonstrated that H3 T11ph was highly enriched at presumed sites of attachment of chromatin to chromosome axes, gave a more modest signal along chromatin loops, and was present at still lower levels immediately adjacent to DSB hotspots. These localization patterns closely tracked the distribution of Red1 and Hop1, axis proteins required for Mek1 activation. These findings provide insight into the spatial disposition of Mek1 kinase activity and the higher order organization of recombining meiotic chromosomes.\n\nbioRxiv version 2 (June 2017)One major experimental change was incorporated into the revised manuscript: We repeated the anti-H3 T11ph ChIP-seq experiment on larger scale, including two meiotic time points from each of two wild type cultures and one time point from a spo11-Y135F mutant culture. To facilitate comparison of different samples, we used meiotic S. pombe cells as a spike-in control for all samples for both anti-H3 and anti-H3 T11ph ChIP-seq. Most conclusions described in the first bioRxiv submission were confirmed, but the improved datasets allowed us to derive more detailed information in particular about H3 T11ph patterns around DSB sites.\n\nbioRxiv version 3 (October 2017)The following experimental changes were incorporated, along with more minor changes in response to reviewer comments: O_LIWe added previously unpublished ChIP-seq data for Red1 protein, generated by Masaru Ito and Kunihiro Ohta, who have been added as coauthors.\nC_LIO_LIWe repeated key experiments with the H3-T11V single point mutant. No conclusions were changed relative to prior experiments with the H3-S10, T11V mutant.\nC_LIO_LIWe repeated the analysis of spore viability in a dmc1 rad54-T132A background using a more appropriate isogenic control, and recapitulated the original conclusion that the H3-T11V mutation modestly decreases spore viability in this sensitized background.\nC_LI

molecular biology↗