Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Holcombe, A. O.

Publications and source records attributed to Holcombe, A. O..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A delay in sampling information from temporally autocorrelated visual stimuli

Much of our world changes smoothly in time, yet the allocation of attention is typically studied with sudden changes - transients. When stimuli change gradually there is a sizeable lag between when a cue is presented and when an object is sampled (Carlson, Hogendoorn, & Verstraten, 2006; Sheth, Nijhawan & Shimojo, 2000). Yet this lag is not seen with rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stimuli where temporally uncorrelated stimuli are presented (Vul, Kanwisher & Nieuwenstein 2008; Goodbourn & Holcombe, 2015). These findings collectively suggest that temporal autocorrelation of a feature paradoxically increases the latency at which information is sampled. This hypothesis was tested by comparing stimuli changing smoothly in time (autocorrelated) to stimuli that change randomly. Participants attempted to report the color coincident with a visual cue. The result was a smaller selection lag for the randomly varying condition relative to the condition with a smooth color trajectory. Our third experiment finds that the increase in selection latency is due to the smoothness of the color change after the cue rather than extrapolated predictions based on the color changes presented before the cue. Together, these results support a theory of attentional drag, whereby attention remains engaged at a location longer when features are changing smoothly. A computational model provides insights into neural mechanisms that might underlie the effect.

neuroscience

Attention updates the perceived position of moving objects

The information used by conscious perception may be somewhat different from that which drives certain actions. In support of this notion, recent studies reported that although internal grating motion can accumulate over seconds into a large illusory position shift, this position shift is not reflected in saccade targeting (action). Another possibility however is that rather than saccades and other actions having privileged access to the correct position, the attention shift thought to precede saccades resets the accumulated position shift to zero. Here we found that the accumulation of illusory position shift can be reset by transients near the moving object and also by the observer pressing a button at the time the object is perceived to reach a particular position. This creates a striking impression of the object jumping back to near its actual position. These results suggest that both stimulus-driven attention and attention associated with control of action may update the perceived position of moving objects and mediate the previously reported dissociation between conscious perception and saccades.

neuroscience