Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hodgson, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Hodgson, C..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

IL15/IL15Rα complex induces an anti-tumor immune response following radiation therapy only in the absence of Tregs and fails to induce expansion of progenitor TCF1+ CD8 T cells

BackgroundThis work seeks to understand whether IL15-incorporating treatments improve response to radiotherapy and uncover mechanistic rationale for overcoming resistance to IL15 agonism using novel therapeutic combinations. Experimental DesignOrthotopic tumor models of PDAC were used to determine response to treatment. IL15-/- and Rag1-/- mouse models were employed to determine dependence on IL15 and CTLs, respectively. Flow cytometry was used to assess immune cell frequency and activation state. Phospho-proteomic analyses were used to characterize intracellular signaling pathways. ResultsWe show that the combination of radiation therapy (RT) and an IL15/IL15Ra fusion complex (denoted IL15c) fails to confer anti-tumor efficacy; however, a CD8-driven anti-tumor immune response is elicited with the concurrent administration of an aCD25 Treg-depleting antibody. Using IL15-/- and Rag1-/- mice, we demonstrate that response to RT + IL15c + aCD25 is dependent on both IL15 and CTLs. Furthermore, despite an equivalent survival benefit following treatment with RT + IL15c + aCD25 and combination RT + PD1-IL2v, a novel immunocytokine with PD-1 and IL2R{beta}{gamma} binding domains, CTL immunophenotyping and phospho-proteomic analysis of intracellular metabolites showed significant upregulation of activation and functionality in CD8 T cells treated with RT + PD1-IL2v. Finally, we show the immunostimulatory response to RT + PD1-IL2v is significantly diminished with a concurrent lack of TCF+ CD8 T cell generation in the absence of functional IL15 signaling. ConclusionsOur results are illustrative of a mechanism wherein unimpeded effector T cell activation through IL2R{beta} signaling and Treg inhibition are necessary in mediating an anti-tumor immune response.

cancer biology↗

Divergent response to radio-immunotherapy is defined by intrinsic features of the tumor microenvironment

BackgroundTreatment with immunotherapy can elicit varying responses across cancer types, and the mechanistic underpinnings that contribute to response vs. progression remain poorly understood. However, to date there are few preclinical models that accurately represent these disparate disease scenarios. MethodsUsing combinatorial radio-immunotherapy consisting of PD-1 blockade, IL2R{beta}{gamma} biased signaling, and OX40 agonism we were able to generate preclinical tumor models with conflicting responses, where head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) models responds and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) progresses. ResultsBy modeling these disparate states, we find that regulatory T cells (Tregs) are expanded in PDAC tumors undergoing treatment, constraining tumor reactive CD8 T cell activity. Consequently, the depletion of Tregs restores the therapeutic efficacy of our treatment and abrogates the disparity between models. Moreover, we show that through heterotopic implantations that the site of tumor development defines the response to therapy, as implantation of HNSCC tumors into the pancreas resulted in comparable levels of tumor progression. ConclusionsThis work highlights complexity of combining immunotherapies within the tumor microenvironment and further defines the immune and non-immune components of the tumor microenvironment as an intrinsic feature of immune suppression. What is already known on this topicO_LIIn Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), targeting PD-1 and IL2R{beta}{gamma} simultaneously (PD1-IL2v) has been shown to be effective when combined with radiation therapy (RT), yet complete response is still limited. The T cell co-stimulatory receptor OX40 (TNFRSF4) has pleiotropic effects, promoting T cell survival, expansion, and memory differentiation in conventional effector T cells, while subsequently limiting regulatory T cell (Treg) suppression by constraining induction and expression of Foxp3. Expression of OX40 is highly upregulated after treatment with PD1-IL2v, and we postulated that combining OX40 agonism with PD1-IL2v and RT would provide additional benefit. C_LI What this study addsO_LIUsing orthotopic models of HNSCC and PDAC, we found that the addition of OX40 agonism unexpectedly drives tumor progression in PDAC, but not HNSCC. Intriguingly, this effect dependent on the tumor microenvironment as the effect is reversed by swapping the location of tumor implantation. This progression was also abrogated by the depletion of regulatory T cells (Tregs), a known mediator of resistance in these models. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policyO_LIOur data demonstrate that unexpected and deleterious effects can stem from combining multiple immunotherapies. These findings hold particular translational relevance as the use of combination immunotherapies is increasingly common on trial. C_LI

immunology↗

The pro-tumoral and anti-tumoral roles of EphA4 on T regulatory cells and tumor associated macrophages during HNSCC tumor progression.

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is a deadly cancer with poor response to targeted therapy, largely driven by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Here we examine the immune-modulatory role of the receptor tyrosine kinase EphA4 in HNSCC progression. Within the TME, EphA4 is primarily expressed on regulatory T cells (Tregs) and macrophages. In contrast ephrinB2, an activating ligand of EphA4, is expressed in tumor blood vessels. Using genetically engineered mouse models, we show that EphA4 expressed in Tregs promotes tumor growth, whereas EphA4 expressed in monocytes inhibits tumor growth. In contrast, ephrinB2 knockout in blood vessels reduces both intratumoral Tregs and macrophages. A novel specific EphA4 inhibitor, APY-d3-PEG4, reverses the accelerated tumor growth we had previously reported with EphB4 cancer cell knockout. EphA4 knockout in macrophages not only enhanced their differentiation into M2 macrophage but also increased Treg suppressive activity. APY-d3-PEG4 reversed the accelerated growth seen in the EphA4 knockout of monocytes but conferred no additional benefit when EphA4 was knocked out on Tregs. Underscoring an EphA4-mediated interplay between Tregs and macrophages, we found that knockout of EphA4 in Tregs not only decreases their activation but also reduces tumor infiltration of pro-tumoral M2 macrophages. These data identify Tregs as a primary target of APY-d3-PEG4 and suggest a role for Tregs in regulating macrophage conversion. These data also support the possible anti-cancer therapeutic value of bispecific peptides or antibodies capable of promoting EphA4 blockade in Tregs but not macrophages. SignificanceEphA4 in regulatory T cells has a pro-tumoral effect while EphA4 in macrophages plays an anti-tumoral role underscoring the necessity of developing biologically rational therapeutics.

cancer biology↗