Hölter, S. M. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2023

Comparative phenotyping of mice reveals canonical and noncanonical physiological functions of TRα and TRβ

Thyroid hormone (TH) effects are mediated through TH receptors (TRs) TR1, TR{beta}1, and TR{beta}2. The TRs bind to thyroid hormone responsive elements on the DNA and regulate expression of TH target genes as ligand dependent transcription factors (canonical signaling). In addition, the TRs and {beta} mediate activation of signaling pathways, e.g. the PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathways (noncanonical signaling). Whether such DNA-binding independent TR action contributes to the spectrum of physiological TH effects is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to attribute physiological effects to the two TR isoforms and {beta} and their canonical and noncanonical signaling. We conducted multi-parameter phenotyping in male and female TR knockout mice (TRKO, TR{beta}KO), mice with disrupted canonical signaling due to a mutation in the TR DNA-binding domain (TRGS, TR{beta}GS) and their respective wild-type littermates. Perturbations in senses, especially hearing (mainly TR{beta} with a lesser impact of TR), visual acuity and retinal thickness (TR and TR{beta}), in muscle metabolism (TR) and in heart rate (TR) highlighted the role of canonical TR action. Strikingly, selective abrogation of canonical TR action often had little to no phenotypic consequence, suggesting that noncanonical TR action sufficed to maintain the wild-type phenotype for specific effects. For instance, macrocytic anemia, reduced retinal vascularization or increased anxiety related behavior were only observed in TRKO, but not TRGS mice. Noncanonical TR action increased the efficiency of energy utilization and prevented hyperphagia observed in TRKO mice. In summary, by examining the phenotypes of TR and TR{beta} knockout models alongside their DNA-binding-deficient GS mutants and wildtype counterparts, we could establish that the independent noncanonical actions of TR and TR{beta} play a crucial role in modulating sensory, behavioral, and metabolic functions. This comparison underscores the significance of the TRs in orchestrating a spectrum of physiological processes beyond their traditional genomic pathways.

physiology↗

bioRxiv2023

Development and Application of Home Cage Monitoring in Laboratory Mice and Rats: a Systematic Review

Traditionally, in biomedical animal research, laboratory rodents are individually examined in test apparatuses outside their home cages at selected time points. However, the outcome of such tests can be influenced by the novel environment, the time of day, separation from the social group, or the presence of an experimenter. Moreover, valuable information may be missed when the animals are only monitored in short periods. These issues can be overcome by longitudinal monitoring mice and rats in their home cages. To shed light on the development of home cage monitoring (HCM) and the current state of the art, a systematic review was carried out on 521 publications retrieved through PubMed and Web of Science. Both the absolute ([~] x26) and relative ([~] x7) number of HCM-related publications increased from 1974 to 2020. In both mice and rats, there was a clear bias towards males and individually housed animals, but during the past decade (2011-2020), an increasing number of studies used both sexes and group housing. More than 70 % of the studies did not involve a disease model, but the percentage of studies using disease models increased since the 2000s. In most studies, animals were kept for short (up to 4 weeks) length periods in the HCM systems; intermediate length periods (4-12 weeks) increased in frequency in the years between 2011 and 2020. Before the 2000s, HCM techniques were predominantly applied for less than 12 hours, while 24-hour measurements have been more frequently since the 2000s. The systematic review demonstrated that manual monitoring is decreasing but still relevant. Until (and including) the 1990s, most techniques were applied manually but have been progressively replaced by automation since the 2000s. Independent of the publication year, the main behavioral parameters measured were locomotor activity, feeding, and social behaviors; the main physiological parameters were heart rate and electrocardiography. External appearance-related parameters were rarely examined in the home cages. Due to technological progress and application of artificial intelligence, more refined and detailed behavioral parameters could be investigated in the home cage in recent times. Over the period covered in this study, techniques for HCM of mice and rats has improved considerably. This development is ongoing and further progress and validation of HCM systems will extend the applications to allow for continuous, longitudinal, non-invasive monitoring of an increasing range of parameters in group-housed small rodents in their home cages.

animal behavior and cognition↗