Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ho, T. K.

Publications and source records attributed to Ho, T. K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of Unexpected Underfoot Perturbations During Turning on Measures of Mediolateral Stability and Corresponding Recovery Strategies

Humans regularly walk across uneven terrain, which demands the use of reactive control strategies to maintain forward progress and stability. While reactive control during walking has been well described during straight gait, it is unclear how reactive control differs during turning gait. Because turning is asymmetrical, perturbations to the inside and outside limbs may elicit different reactive adjustments. This study investigates how unexpected underfoot perturbations alter stability measures during turning and how individuals alter their foot placement to maintain stability after such perturbations. Seven healthy adults completed walking trials around a circular track while wearing mechanized shoes that pseudo-randomly delivered underfoot perturbations to either the inside or outside limb. We calculated mediolateral margin of stability corrected for centripetal acceleration (ML MoSC), step width, and step length from kinematic data. Linear mixed effects models compared the effects of perturbation type (inversion vs eversion), perturbation limb (inside vs outside), and their interaction for each outcome measure. ML MoSC was affected by both perturbation type and perturbation limb, with larger changes observed during eversion, and outside, perturbations. Changes to step width and step time during two recovery steps after each perturbation were primarily influenced by the perturbation limb - outside perturbations elicited consistent changes during two recovery steps compared to one altered step after inside perturbations. Perturbations to the outside limb during turning disrupt gait longer than perturbations to the inside limb. This difference across perturbation limb may indicate that outside steps are more important to maintaining and recovering stability than inside ones during turning.

bioengineering↗

The Choice of Reference Frame Alters Interpretations of Non-Linear Gait

IntroductionHumans regularly follow non-linear trajectories, such as turning, during everyday ambulation. However, globally-defined and locally-defined reference frames fall out of alignment during non- linear locomotion, which complicates spatiotemporal and biomechanical analyses of gait. Thus, the choice of the locally-defined reference frame is an important methodological consideration. This study investigated how different definitions of reference frame change the results and interpretations of common gait measures. MethodsNine healthy adults completed two walking trials around a circular track. Kinematic data were collected via motion capture and used to calculate step length, step width, anteroposterior margin of stability, and mediolateral margin of stability using three different locally-defined reference frames: walkway-fixed, body-fixed, and trajectory-fixed. Linear-mixed effects models compared the effect of reference frame on each gait measure, and the effect of reference frame on conclusions about a known effect of turning gait - asymmetrical stepping patterns. ResultsAll four gait measures differed significantly across the three reference frames. A significant interaction of reference frame and step type (i.e. inside vs outside step) on all four gait measures (p < 0.001) indicated conclusions about asymmetry differed based on the choice of reference frame. ConclusionThe choice of reference frame will change the calculated gait measures and may alter the conclusions of studies investigating non-linear gait. Care should be taken when comparing studies that used different reference frames, as results cannot be easily harmonized. Future studies of non-linear gait need to justify and detail their choice of reference frame.

bioengineering↗