Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hinrichs, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Hinrichs, R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Epigenetic state and gene expression remain stable after CRISPR/Cas-mediated chromosomal inversions

In Arabidopsis thaliana, the chromosome arms are DNA-hypomethylated and enriched in the euchromatin-specific histone mark H3K4me3. In contrast, pericentromeric regions are DNA-hypermethylated and enriched in H3K9me2. In order to investigate how chromosomal location affects epigenetic stability and gene activity, we induced two differently-sized inversions by CRISPR/Cas and introduced heterochromatic, pericentric sequences into an euchromatic chromosomal arm. The epigenetic status of the lines was investigated by whole genome bisulfite sequencing and chromatin immunoprecipitation. Additionally, we studied the effect of the chromosomal inversions on gene expression. Our analysis revealed that both inversions affected neither the global distribution of eu- and heterochromatin-specific histone marks nor the global DNA methylation landscape. However, minor epigenetic changes were found across the entire genome. Importantly, the inverted chromosome regions and their border regions did not change their epigenetic profile. The transcription analysis of both inversion lines revealed that 0.5 - 1 % of genes were differentially expressed across the entire genome. However, the expression activity of those genes encoded by the inverted segments, and located around the cutting sites of CRISPR/Cas was less affected. Thus, gene expression levels and the epigenetic landscape remain preserved following engineered chromosomal restructuring, at least in the following generations.

genetics↗

Visual evidence for the recruitment of four enzymes with RNase activity to the Bacillus subtilis replication forks

Removal of RNA/DNA hybrids for the maturation of Okazaki fragments on the lagging strand, or due to misincorporation of ribonucleotides by DNA polymerases, is essential for all types of cells. In prokaryotic cells such as Escherichia coli, DNA polymerase 1 and RNase HI are supposed to remove RNA from Okazaki fragments, but many bacteria lack HI-type RNases, such as Bacillus subtilis. Here, four proteins have been shown to be able to remove RNA from RNA/DNA hybrids in vitro, but their actual contribution to DNA replication is unclear. We have studied the dynamics of DNA polymerase A (similar to Pol 1), 5->3 exonuclease ExoR, and the two endoribonucleases RNase HII and HIII in B. subtilis using single molecule tracking. We found that all four enzymes show a localization pattern similar to that of replicative DNA helicase. By scoring the distance of tracks to replication forks, we found that all four enzymes are enriched at DNA replication centers. After inducing UV damage, RNase HIII was even more strongly recruited to the replication forks, and PolA showed a more static behavior, indicative of longer binding events, whereas RNase HII and ExoR showed no response. Inhibition of replication by HPUra clearly demonstrated that both RNase HII and RNase HIII are directly involved in replication, with RNase HIII playing a major role. We found that the absence of ExoR increases the likelihood of RNase HIII at the forks, indicating that substrate availability rather than direct protein interactions may be a major driver for the recruitment of RNases to the lagging strands. Thus, B. subtilis replication forks appear to be an intermediate between E. coli type and eukaryotic replication forks and employ a multitude of RNases, rather than any dedicated enzyme for RNA/DNA hybrid removal.

microbiology↗