Biology subjects

Hinczewski, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Hinczewski, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Modeling the growth of organisms validates a general relation between metabolic costs and natural selection

Metabolism and evolution are closely connected: if a mutation incurs extra energetic costs for an organism, there is a baseline selective disadvantage that may or may not be compensated for by other adaptive effects. A long-standing, but to date unproven, hypothesis is that this disadvantage is equal to the fractional cost relative to the total resting metabolic expenditure. This hypothesis has found a recent resurgence as a powerful tool for quantitatively understanding the strength of selection among different classes of organisms. Our work explores the validity of the hypothesis from first principles through a generalized metabolic growth model, versions of which have been successful in describing organismal growth from single cells to higher animals. We build a mathematical framework to calculate how perturbations in maintenance and synthesis costs translate into contributions to the selection coefficient, a measure of relative fitness. This allows us to show that the hypothesis is an approximation to the actual baseline selection coefficient. Moreover we can directly derive the correct prefactor in its functional form, as well as analytical bounds on the accuracy of the hypothesis for any given realization of the model. We illustrate our general framework using a special case of the growth model, which we show provides a quantitative description of overall metabolic synthesis and maintenance expenditures in data collected from a wide array of unicellular organisms (both prokaryotes and eukaryotes). In all these cases we demonstrate that the hypothesis is an excellent approximation, allowing estimates of baseline selection coefficients to within 15% of their actual values. Even in a broader biological parameter range, covering growth data from multicellular organisms, the hypothesis continues to work well, always within an order of magnitude of the correct result. Our work thus justifies its use as a versatile tool, setting the stage for its wider deployment.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Unraveling the mechanism of the cadherin-catenin-actin catch bond

The adherens junctions between epithelial cells involve a protein complex formed by E-cadherin, {beta}-catenin, -catenin and F-actin. The stability of this complex was a puzzle for many years, since in vitro studies could reconstitute various stable subsets of the individual proteins, but never the entirety. The missing ingredient turned out to be mechanical tension: a recent experiment that applied physiological forces to the complex with an optical tweezer dramatically increased its lifetime, a phenomenon known as catch bonding. However, in the absence of a crystal structure for the full complex, the microscopic details of the catch bond mechanism remain mysterious. Building on structural clues that point to -catenin as the force transducer, we present a quantitative theoretical model for how the catch bond arises, fully accounting for the experimental lifetime distributions. The model allows us to predict the energetic changes induced by tension at the interface between -catenin and F-actin. It also identifies a significant energy barrier due to a network of salt bridges between two conformational states of {beta}-catenin. By stabilizing one of these states, this barrier could play a role in how the complex responds to additional in vivo binding partners like vinculin. Since significant conformational energy barriers are a common feature of other adhesion systems that exhibit catch bonds, our model can be adapted into a general theoretical framework for integrating structure and function in a variety of force-regulated protein complexes.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2017

Optimal Information Transfer In Enzymatic Networks: A Field Theoretic Formulation

Signaling in enzymatic networks is typically triggered by environmental fluctuations, resulting in a series of stochastic chemical reactions, leading to corruption of the signal by noise. For example, information flow is initiated by binding of extracellular ligands to receptors, which is transmitted through a cascade involving kinase-phosphatase stochastic chemical reactions. For a class of such networks, we develop a general field-theoretic approach in order to calculate the error in signal transmission as a function of an appropriate control variable. Application of the theory to a simple push-pull network, a module in the kinase-phosphatase cascade, recovers the exact results for error in signal transmission previously obtained using umbral calculus (Phys. Rev. X., 4, 041017 (2014)). We illustrate the generality of the theory by studying the minimal errors in noise reduction in a reaction cascade with two connected push-pull modules. Such a cascade behaves as an effective three-species network with a pseudo intermediate. In this case, optimal information transfer, resulting in the smallest square of the error between the input and output, occurs with a time delay, which is given by the inverse of the decay rate of the pseudo intermediate. Surprisingly, in these examples the minimum error computed using simulations that take non-linearities and discrete nature of molecules into account coincides with the predictions of a linear theory. In contrast, there are substantial deviations between simulations and predictions of the linear theory in error in signal propagation in an enzymatic push-pull network for a certain range of parameters. Inclusion of second order perturbative corrections shows that differences between simulations and theoretical predictions are minimized. Our study establishes that a field theoretic formulation of stochastic biological signaling offers a systematic way to understand error propagation in networks of arbitrary complexity.

biophysics↗