Hillebrand, H. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2025

Quantifying the net effect of biodiversity on stability

Understanding the relationship between biodiversity and both the functioning and stability of ecosystems has been a central focus of ecologists for decades. A step-change in our understanding of the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship was enabled by explicit measurement of the additional functioning provided by biodiversity through comparing expected and observed yields in multi-species communities. However, we lack an equivalent measure for stability. Here, we quantify the net biodiversity effect on stability using model simulations and a microcosm experiment that exposed different phytoplankton species and their combinations to temperature increases and fluctuations. As an emergent property of communities, stability frequently exceeded the expected stability of the combined component species, leading to a net biodiversity effect on stability analogous to the effect on functioning. In our simulations, these effects depended on the strength of competitive interactions as well as species composition and their thermal niche. Experimentally, the stabilising effect of diversity was, however, non-linear, greatest for two-species combinations, and varied with both community composition and disturbance regime. Quantifying the net biodiversity effect on stability advances our mechanistic understanding of the biodiversity-stability relationship, and provides crucial information to support ecosystem management and conservation.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2024

Body size is a better predictor of intra- than interspecific variation of animal stoichiometry across realms

Animal stoichiometry affects fundamental processes ranging from organismal physiology to global element cycles. However, it is unknown whether animal stoichiometry follows predictable scaling relationships with body mass and whether adaptation to life on land or water constrains patterns of elemental allocation. To test both interspecific and intraspecific body-size scaling relationships of the nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and N:P content of animals, we used a subset of the StoichLife database encompassing 9,933 individual animals (vertebrates and invertebrates) belonging to 1,543 species spanning 10 orders of magnitude of body size from terrestrial, freshwater, and marine realms. Across species, body mass did not explain much variation in %N and %P composition, although the %P of invertebrates decreased with size. The effects of body size on species elemental content were small in comparison to the effects of taxonomy. Body size was a better predictor of intraspecific than interspecific elemental patterns. Between 42 to 45% in intraspecific stoichiometric variation was explained by body size for 27% of vertebrate species and 35% of invertebrate species. Further, differences between organisms inhabiting aquatic and terrestrial realms were observed only in invertebrate interspecific %N, suggesting that the realm does not play an important role in determining elemental allocation of animals. Based on our analysis of the most comprehensive animal stoichiometry database, we conclude that (i) both body size and realm are relatively weak predictors of animal stoichiometry across taxa, and (ii) body size is a good predictor of intraspecific variation in animal elemental content, which is consistent with tissue-scaling relationships that hold broadly across large groups of animals. This research reveals a lack of general scaling patterns in the elemental content across animals and instead points to a large variation in scaling relationships within and among lineages.

ecology↗