Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hight, A. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Hight, A. E..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Distinct cortical encoding of acoustic and electrical cochlear stimulation

Cochlear implants are neuroprosthetic devices that restore hearing and speech comprehension to profoundly deaf humans and represent an exemplar application of biomedical engineering and research to clinical conditions. However, the utility of these devices in many subjects is limited, largely due to lack of information about how neural circuits respond to implant stimulation. Recently we showed that deafened rats can use cochlear implants to recognize sounds, and that this training refined the responses of single neurons in the primary auditory cortex. Here we asked how local populations of cortical neurons represent acute implant stimuli, using electrode arrays we developed for cortical surface recordings for micro-electrocorticography ({micro}ECoG), a form of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG). We found that there was a coarse, non-random spatial organization with limited evidence for consistent, sharply graded cochleotopy across recording sites, relative to a clearer tonotopic spatial representation in normal-hearing rats. Single-trial iEEG responses to acoustic inputs were more reliable than responses to cochlear implant stimulation, although stimulus identity could be successfully decoded in both cases. However, the spatio-temporal response profiles to acoustic vs cochlear implant stimulation were substantially different. Decoders trained on acoustic responses showed essentially zero information transfer when tested on electrical stimulation responses in the same animals after deafening and cochlear implant stimulation. Thus, while acute cochlear implant stimulation evoked spatially non-random cortical activity with coarse cochleotopic structure, the dynamics of network activity were substantially different from those evoked by acoustic stimulation, with possible implications for perceptual similarity that remain to be tested.

neuroscience↗

Neural signatures of auditory hypersensitivity following acoustic trauma

Throughout the brain, neurons exhibit a remarkable capacity to maintain stable firing rates despite large perturbations in afferent activity levels. As an exception, homeostatic regulation of neural activity often fails in the adult auditory system after hearing loss. Cochlear deafferentation caused by aging or noise exposure triggers widespread neural hyperactivity, particularly in the auditory cortex (ACtx), which underlies perceptual disorders including tinnitus and hyperacusis. Here, we show that mice with noise-induced damage of the high-frequency cochlear base were behaviorally hypersensitive to spared mid-frequency tones and to direct optogenetic stimulation of auditory thalamocortical neurons. Chronic 2-photon calcium imaging from ACtx pyramidal neurons (PyrNs) revealed an initial stage of diffuse hyperactivity, hypercorrelation, and hyperresponsivity that consolidated around deafferented map regions three or more days after acoustic trauma. Deafferented PyrN ensembles displayed hypersensitive decoding of spared mid-frequency tones, mirroring behavioral hypersensitivity. At the level of individual PyrNs, some exhibited stable, homeostatic gain control after acoustic trauma, while others showed non-homeostatic excess gain. Interestingly, factors such as baseline spontaneous activity levels and sound level encoding could account for 40% of the variability in PyrN gain regulation after acoustic trauma. These findings suggest that non-homeostatic regulation of cortical sound intensity coding following sensorineural loss may underlie the well-established clinical phenomenon of loudness hypersensitivity. Further, while cortical gain changes are triggered by reduced bottom-up afferent input, their subsequent stabilization is also shaped by their local circuit milieu, where baseline response features can identify neurons with the greatest propensity for developing pathological hyperactivity following sensorineural hearing loss.

neuroscience↗

Cellular and widefield imaging of sound frequency organization in primary and higher-order fields of the mouse auditory cortex

The mouse auditory cortex (ACtx) contains two core fields - A1 and AAF - arranged in a mirror reversal tonotopic gradient. The best frequency (BF) organization and naming scheme for additional higher-order fields remain a matter of debate, as does the correspondence between smoothly varying global tonotopy and heterogeneity in local cellular tuning. Here, we performed chronic widefield and 2-photon calcium imaging from the ACtx of awake Thy1-GCaMP6s reporter mice. Data-driven parcellation of widefield maps identified five fields, including a previously unidentified area at the ventral posterior extreme of the ACtx (VPAF) and a tonotopically organized suprarhinal auditory field (SRAF) that extended laterally as far as ectorhinal cortex. Widefield maps were stable over time, where single pixel BFs fluctuated by less than 0.5 octaves during a one-month imaging period. After accounting for neuropil signal and frequency tuning strength, BF organization in neighboring layer 2/3 neurons was intermediate to the heterogeneous salt and pepper organization and the highly precise local organization that have each been described in prior studies. Multiscale imaging data suggest there is no ultrasonic field or secondary auditory cortex in the mouse. Instead, VPAF and a dorsoposterior field (DP) emerged as the strongest candidates for higher-order auditory areas.

neuroscience↗