Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Higasa, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Higasa, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

LAVENDER: latent axes discovery from multiple cytometry samples with non-parametric divergence estimation and multidimensional scaling reconstruction

Computational cytometry methods are now frequently used in flow and mass cytometric data analyses. However, systematic bias-free methodologies to assess inter-sample variability have been lacking, thereby hampering efficient data mining from a large set of samples. Here, we devised a computational method termed LAVENDER (latent axes discovery from multiple cytometry samples with nonparametric divergence estimation and multidimensional scaling reconstruction). It measures the Jensen-Shannon distances between samples using the k-nearest neighbor density estimation and reconstructs samples in a new coordinate space, called the LAVENDER space. The axes of this space can then be compared against other omics measurements to obtain biological information. Application of LAVENDER to multidimensional flow cytometry datasets of 301 Japanese individuals immunized with a seasonal influenza vaccine revealed an axis related to baseline immunological characteristics of each individual. This axis correlated with the proportion of plasma cells and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, a clinical marker of the systemic inflammatory response. The same method was also applicable to mass cytometry data with more molecular markers. These results demonstrate that LAVENDER is a useful tool for identifying critical heterogeneity among similar, yet different, single-cell datasets.

bioinformatics

Legacy Data Confounds Genomics Studies

Recent reports have identified differences in the mutational spectra across human populations. While some of these reports have been replicated in other cohorts, most have been reported only in the 1000 Genomes Project (1kGP) data. While investigating an intriguing putative population stratification within the Japanese population, we identified a previously unreported batch effect leading to spurious mutation calls in the 1kGP data and to the apparent population stratification. Because the 1kGP data is used extensively, we find that the batch effects also lead to incorrect imputation by leading imputation servers and a small number of suspicious GWAS associations. Lower-quality data from the early phases of the 1kGP thus continues to contaminate modern studies in hidden ways. It may be time to retire or upgrade such legacy sequencing data.

bioinformatics