Biology subjects

Herbert-Read, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Herbert-Read, J..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Perceptual constraints of motion shape animal movement strategies

As animals explore their environment, self-generated motion can affect visual perception, while perceptual constraints shape movement decisions. Movement strategies should therefore balance the benefits of exploration against the potential perceptual costs of motion. Here, we test whether the movement strategies animals adopt can enhance information acquisition while accounting for the constraints that motion imposes on visual perception. We first quantified the visual perceptual abilities of freely moving fish in three dimensions by projecting virtual prey around three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus), determining how the likelihood of detecting prey varied across the fish's visual field as a function of their movement. Self-induced motion reduced the likelihood prey were detected, with increases in speed non-linearly reducing the perceptual abilities of the fish. Using agent-based simulations based on empirical models of visual perception, we demonstrate that when visual perception degrades non-linearly with speed, the strategy that maximizes prey detection is 'saltatory' locomotion, involving stationary pauses interspersed with movements. Moreover, experiments with freely swimming fish showed they adopted specific durations of stops and movements that improved prey detection given the way motion impacts their perception. Our results reveal that some movement strategies are more effective than others at gathering information during exploration.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2026

Aposematic signals are dynamic over time in bioluminescent ostracods

Aposematic signals convey information about prey unpalatability to potential predators. Such signals are defined as advertisements, with prey usually signalling unpalatability before an attack. Overlooked, however, is whether signals presented after an attack can function as aposematic warnings and influence the efficacy of defense. Here, we test if post-attack signals can be aposematic by observing fish predators responding to prey (Ostracoda, Cypridinidae) that produce bioluminescence following an attack. By manipulating potential chemical defenses of prey, and by comparing feeding responses to both bioluminescent and nonluminescent prey, we provide multiple lines of evidence to show bioluminescent prey are unpalatable and use post-attack bioluminescence as an aposematic signal. First, live, bioluminescent prey secrete bioluminescence only after being attacked. Second, predatory fishes rarely consumed bioluminescent prey, especially compared to nonluminescent alternatives. Third, because fishes readily ate bioluminescent prey that had been treated (frozen or boiled), which should remove defenses, bioluminescent species likely possess some unidentified defense over nonluminescent relatives. Finally, over the course of four experimental trials, predators were less likely to consume bioluminescent prey as their cumulative exposure to bioluminescent displays increased, indicative of learning. Post-attack aposematic signals, like bioluminescence, may be as common and effective a defensive strategy as pre-attack signals.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2022

Evolution of schooling propensity in the guppy drives changes in anti-predator behavior that are linked to neuroanatomy

One of the most spectacular displays of social behavior is the synchronized movements that many animal groups perform to travel, forage and escape from predators. However, elucidating the neural mechanisms underlying the evolution of collective behaviors, as well as their fitness effects, remains challenging. Here, we study anti-predator behavior in guppies experimentally selected for divergence in polarization, an important behavioral aspect of coordinated movement. We find that groups from artificially selected lines remain more polarized than control groups in the presence of a threat. Neuroanatomical measurements of polarization-selected individuals indicated changes in brain regions previously suggested to be important regulators of perception, fear and attention, and motor response. Additional visual acuity and temporal resolution tests performed in polarization-selected and control individuals indicate that observed differences in anti-predator and schooling behavior should not be attributable to changes in visual perception, but rather are more likely the result of the more efficient relay of sensory input in the brain of polarization-selected fish. Our findings highlight that brain morphology may play a fundamental role in the evolution of coordinated movement and anti-predator behavior.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2021

The measure of spatial position within groups that best predicts predation risk depends on group movement

Both empirical and theoretical studies show that an individuals spatial position within a group can impact the risk of being targeted by predators. Spatial positions can be quantified in numerous ways, but there are no direct comparisons of different spatial measures in predicting the risk of being targeted by real predators. Here we assess these spatial measures in groups of stationary and moving virtual prey being attacked by three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). In stationary groups, the limited domain of danger best predicted the likelihood of attack. In moving groups, the number of near neighbours was the best predictor but only over a limited range of distances within which other prey were counted. Otherwise, measures of proximity to the groups edge outperformed measures of local crowding in moving groups. There was no evidence that predators preferentially attacked the front or back of the moving groups. Domains of danger without any limit, as originally used in the selfish herd model, were also a poor predictor of risk. These findings reveal that the collective properties of prey can influence how spatial position affects predation risk, via effects on predators targeting, hence selection may act differently on prey positioning behaviour depending on group movement.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2020

Achromatic body markings as a widespread visual mechanism across group living animals

Grouping is a widespread form of predator defense, with individuals in groups often performing evasive collective movements in response to predators attacks. Individuals in these groups use behavioral rules to coordinate their movements, with visual cues about neighbors positions and orientations informing movement decisions. Although the exact visual cues individuals use to coordinate their movements with neighbors have not yet been decoded, some studies have suggested that stripes, lines or other body patterns may act as conspicuous conveyors of movement information that could promote coordinated group movement, or promote dazzle camouflage, thereby confusing predators. We used phylogenetic logistic regressions to test whether the contrasting achromatic stripes present in four different taxa vulnerable to predation, including species within two orders of birds (Anseriformes and Charadriiformes), a suborder of Artiodactyla (the ruminants) and several orders of marine fish (predominantly Perciformes) were associated with group living. Contrasting patterns were significantly more prevalent in social species, and tended to be absent in solitary species or species less vulnerable to predation. We suggest that stripes taking the form of light-colored lines on dark backgrounds, or vice versa, provide a widespread mechanism across taxa that serves either to inform conspecifics of neighbors directional movement, or to confuse predators, when moving in groups. Detection and processing of patterns and of motion in the visual channel is essentially colourblind. That diverse animal taxa with widely different vision systems (including di-, tri- and tetrachromats) appear to have converged on a similar use of achromatic patterns is therefore expected given signal-detection theory. This hypothesis would explain the convergent evolution of conspicuous achromatic patterns as an antipredator mechanism in numerous vertebrate species.

evolutionary biology↗